» Articles » PMID: 32918207

Morphophysiological and Biochemical Attributes Influence Intra-genotypic Preference of Shoot Fly [Atherigona Soccata (Rondani)] Among Sorghum Genotypes

Overview
Journal Protoplasma
Publisher Springer
Specialty Biology
Date 2020 Sep 12
PMID 32918207
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Shoot fly [Atherigona soccata (Rondani)] is a destructive pest of sorghum at the seedling stage and causes huge losses to grain yield and green fodder. The host-plant resistance mechanism is the best approach to reduce the attack of insects in plants. The damage parameters, morphophysiological traits, and biochemical metabolites had been investigated in the leaves and stem of contrasting sorghum genotypes, viz., resistant (IS18551, ICSV705, ICSV700), moderately resistant (PSC-4), and susceptible (SWARNA and SL-44) at 15 and 21 days after emergence (DAE) against shoot fly infestation. The resistant genotypes recorded lowest shoot fly oviposition and incidence (0.3-0.7 eggs plant and 10-15%) than the susceptible genotypes (2.4-3.0 eggs plant and 70-80%), respectively. The susceptible genotype SWARNA recorded 50% and 80% higher deadheart formation than the resistant genotype IS18551 at 15 and 21 DAE, respectively. Resistant genotypes exhibited higher trichome density at adaxial and abaxial part of leaf (118-145 and 106-131) with pink colored leaf sheath (scale 1.50-3.25), glossy leaves (scale1.00-1.25), and lower leaf surface wetness (scale1.25-2.00) compared with susceptible genotype with 49.3-73.3 and 25.3-64.0, scale 2.50-4.00, scale 2.75-3.50, and scale 3.25-4.25 for the respective parameters. Another defense response of sorghum toward the insect attack was modulation of plant metabolism. The infested genotypes responded to insect attack by upregulation of total soluble sugar, total phenol, prussic acid, and chlorophyll content by 1.2-2.1-fold, 1.5-2.0-fold, 1.2-1.3-fold, and 1.2-3.9-fold with more induction in susceptible genotypes at 21 DAE. On the whole, the present study indicates that morphophysiological and biochemical attributes contribute toward the resistance mechanism in sorghum against shoot fly infestation.

Citing Articles

Recent advancements in the breeding of sorghum crop: current status and future strategies for marker-assisted breeding.

Baloch F, Altaf M, Liaqat W, Bedir M, Nadeem M, Comertpay G Front Genet. 2023; 14:1150616.

PMID: 37252661 PMC: 10213934. DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2023.1150616.


Effects of on cyanogenic glycosides removal and fermentation qualities of ratooning sorghum.

Zhai J, Wang B, Sun Y, Yang J, Zhou J, Wang T Front Microbiol. 2023; 14:1128057.

PMID: 36891380 PMC: 9986436. DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2023.1128057.

References
1.
Bhonwong A, Stout M, Attajarusit J, Tantasawat P . Defensive role of tomato polyphenol oxidases against cotton bollworm (Helicoverpa armigera) and beet armyworm (Spodoptera exigua). J Chem Ecol. 2008; 35(1):28-38. DOI: 10.1007/s10886-008-9571-7. View

2.
Gorthy S, Narasu L, Gaddameedi A, Sharma H, Kotla A, Deshpande S . Introgression of Shoot Fly ( L. Moench) Resistance QTLs into Elite Post-rainy Season Sorghum Varieties Using Marker Assisted Backcrossing (MABC). Front Plant Sci. 2017; 8:1494. PMC: 5585744. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2017.01494. View

3.
Mohammed R, Are A, Munghate R, Bhavanasi R, Polavarapu K, Sharma H . Inheritance of Resistance to Sorghum Shoot Fly, Atherigona soccata in Sorghum, Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench. Front Plant Sci. 2016; 7:543. PMC: 4847611. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2016.00543. View

4.
Padmaja P, Woodcock C, Bruce T . Electrophysiological and behavioral responses of sorghum shoot fly, Atherigona soccata, to sorghum volatiles. J Chem Ecol. 2010; 36(12):1346-53. DOI: 10.1007/s10886-010-9882-3. View

5.
Soto P . Ovipositional preference and antibiosis in relation to resistance to a sorghum shoot fly. J Econ Entomol. 1974; 67(2):265-7. DOI: 10.1093/jee/67.2.265. View