» Articles » PMID: 32917199

Implementation of Three Innovative Interventions in a Psychiatric Emergency Department Aimed at Improving Service Use: a Mixed-method Study

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Health Services
Date 2020 Sep 12
PMID 32917199
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Emergency department (ED) use is often viewed as an indicator of health system quality. ED use for mental health (MH) reasons is increasing and costly for health systems, patients, and their families. Patients with mental disorders (MD) including substance use disorders (SUD) and suicidal behaviors are high ED users. Improving ED services for these patients and their families, and developing alternatives to ED use are thus key issues. This study aimed to: (1) describe the implementation of three innovative interventions provided by a brief intervention team, crisis center team, and family-peer support team in a Quebec psychiatric ED, including the identification of implementation barriers, and (2) evaluate the impacts of these ED innovations on MH service use and response to needs.

Method: Using mixed methods with data triangulation, the implementation and impact of the three above-named ED interventions were studied. Quantitative data were collected from 101 participants (81 patients, 20 family members) using a user questionnaire and patient medical records. Qualitative data were gathered from focus groups (n = 3) with key intervention staff members (n = 14). The user questionnaire also included open-ended questions. Descriptive, comparative and content analyses were produced.

Results: Key implementation issues were identified in relation to system, organizational and patient profiles, similar to results identified in most studies in the ED implementation literature aimed at improving responsiveness to patients with MD. Results were encouraging, as the innovations had a significant impact for improved patient MH service use and adequacy of care. Services also seemed adapted to patient profiles. Family members were grateful for the help received in the ED.

Conclusions: Before implementing innovations, managers need to recognize the basic issues common to all new healthcare interventions: the need for staff training and strong involvement, particularly among physicians, development of collaborative tools especially in cases of potential cultural clash between staff and organizations, and continuous quality assessment. Future research needs to confirm the pertinence of these interventions, especially use of family-peer support teams in ED, as a highly innovative intervention. Broader ED strategies could also be deployed to improve MH services and decrease ED use for MH reasons.

Citing Articles

Reasons for High Emergency Department Use Among Patients With Common Mental Disorders or Substance-Related Disorders.

Dion K, Ferland F, Farand L, Gauvin L, Fleury M Healthc Policy. 2024; 19(4):55-69.

PMID: 39229663 PMC: 11411648. DOI: 10.12927/hcpol.2024.27333.


Emergency Department Use among Patients with Mental Health Problems: Profiles, Correlates, and Outcomes.

Fleury M, Cao Z, Grenier G Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2024; 21(7).

PMID: 39063441 PMC: 11276606. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph21070864.


Characteristics for Low, High and Very High Emergency Department Use for Mental Health Diagnoses from Health Records and Structured Interviews.

Fleury M, Cao Z, Grenier G West J Emerg Med. 2024; 25(2):144-154.

PMID: 38596910 PMC: 11000562. DOI: 10.5811/westjem.18327.


Improving emergency department care for adults presenting with mental illness: a systematic review of strategies and their impact on outcomes, experience, and performance.

Austin E, Cheek C, Richardson L, Testa L, Dominello A, Long J Front Psychiatry. 2024; 15:1368129.

PMID: 38487586 PMC: 10937575. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1368129.


Change of home visit frequency by public health nurses predicts emergency escorts for psychiatric patients living in the community: A retrospective medical record review.

Wu M, Hung C, Fang S, Lee T Front Public Health. 2023; 11:1066908.

PMID: 36844831 PMC: 9948617. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1066908.

References
1.
Musgrave C, Timms A, Georgiou G, Glover S, Sque M, Black D . Alcohol-related harm: developing a drug and alcohol liaison team. Br J Nurs. 2018; 27(15):881-885. DOI: 10.12968/bjon.2018.27.15.881. View

2.
Saillant S, Hudelson P, Dominice Dao M, Junod Perron N . The primary care physician/psychiatrist joint consultation: A paradigm shift in caring for patients with mental health problems?. Patient Educ Couns. 2015; 99(2):279-83. DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2015.08.028. View

3.
Siskind D, Harris M, Kisely S, Brogan J, Pirkis J, Crompton D . A retrospective quasi-experimental study of a community crisis house for patients with severe and persistent mental illness. Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2013; 47(7):667-75. DOI: 10.1177/0004867413484369. View

4.
Wand T, DAbrew N, Acret L, White K . Evaluating a new model of nurse-led emergency department mental health care in Australia; perspectives of key informants. Int Emerg Nurs. 2015; 24:16-21. DOI: 10.1016/j.ienj.2015.05.003. View

5.
Carter N, Bryant-Lukosius D, DiCenso A, Blythe J, Neville A . The use of triangulation in qualitative research. Oncol Nurs Forum. 2014; 41(5):545-7. DOI: 10.1188/14.ONF.545-547. View