» Articles » PMID: 32915919

Combined PCR and MAT Improves the Early Diagnosis of the Biphasic Illness Leptospirosis

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2020 Sep 11
PMID 32915919
Citations 13
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The diagnosis of leptospirosis remains a challenge due to its non-specific symptoms and the biphasic nature of the illness. A comprehensive diagnosis that includes both molecular (polymerase chain reaction (PCR)) and serology is vital for early detection of leptospirosis and to avoid misdiagnosis. However, not all samples could be subjected to both tests (serology and molecular) due to budget limitation, infrastructure, and technical expertise at least in resource-limited countries. We evaluated the usefulness of testing the clinically suspected leptospirosis cases with both techniques on all samples collected from the patients on the day of admission. Among the 165 patient's blood/serum samples tested (from three hospitals in Central Malaysia), 43 (26%) showed positivity by microscopic agglutination test (MAT), 63 (38%) by PCR, while 14 (8%) were positive by both MAT and PCR. For PCR, we tested two molecular targets (lipL32 by qPCR and 16S rDNA or rrs by nested PCR) and detected lipL32 in 47 (29%) and rrs gene in 63 (38%) patients. The use of more than one target gene for PCR increased the detection rates. Hence, a highly sensitive multiplex PCR targeting more than one diagnostic marker is recommended for the early detection of Leptospira in suspected patients. When the frequencies for positivity detected either by MAT or PCR combined, leptospirosis was diagnosed in a total of 92 (56%) patients, a higher frequency compared to when samples were only tested by a single method (MAT or PCR). The results from this study suggest the inclusion of both serology and molecular methods for every first sample irrespective of the days post-onset of symptoms (DPO) collected from patients for early diagnosis of leptospirosis.

Citing Articles

Evaluation of Serological Tests for Different Disease Stages of Leptospirosis Infection in Humans.

Rodriguez-Rodriguez V, Castro A, Soto-Florez R, Urango-Gallego L, Calderon-Rangel A, Agudelo-Florez P Trop Med Infect Dis. 2024; 9(11).

PMID: 39591289 PMC: 11598099. DOI: 10.3390/tropicalmed9110283.


Investigation of Leptospirosis Agents in Cattle and Humans.

Bagatir P, Aktas O Malays J Med Sci. 2024; 31(5):151-160.

PMID: 39416737 PMC: 11477467. DOI: 10.21315/mjms2024.31.5.11.


Clinical presentation of human leptospirosis in febrile patients: Urabá, Colombia.

Uribe-Restrepo P, Perez-Garcia J, Arboleda M, Munoz-Zanzi C, Agudelo-Florez P PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2024; 18(9):e0012449.

PMID: 39298533 PMC: 11444379. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0012449.


Improved Antibody Detection for Canine Leptospirosis: ELISAs Modified Using Local Leptospiral Serovar Isolates from Asymptomatic Dogs.

Boonciew P, Saisongkorh W, Brameld S, Thongpin M, Kurilung A, Krangvichian P Animals (Basel). 2024; 14(6).

PMID: 38539991 PMC: 10967358. DOI: 10.3390/ani14060893.


Diagnosis of human leptospirosis: systematic review and meta-analysis of the diagnostic accuracy of the Leptospira microscopic agglutination test, PCR targeting Lfb1, and IgM ELISA to Leptospira fainei serovar Hurstbridge.

Valente M, Bramugy J, Keddie S, Hopkins H, Bassat Q, Baerenbold O BMC Infect Dis. 2024; 24(1):168.

PMID: 38326762 PMC: 10848445. DOI: 10.1186/s12879-023-08935-0.


References
1.
Ahmad S, Shah S, Ahmad F . Laboratory diagnosis of leptospirosis. J Postgrad Med. 2005; 51(3):195-200. View

2.
Thaipadungpanit J, Thaipadunpanit J, Chierakul W, Wuthiekanun V, Limmathurotsakul D, Amornchai P . Diagnostic accuracy of real-time PCR assays targeting 16S rRNA and lipL32 genes for human leptospirosis in Thailand: a case-control study. PLoS One. 2011; 6(1):e16236. PMC: 3026019. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0016236. View

3.
Agampodi S, Matthias M, Moreno A, Vinetz J . Utility of quantitative polymerase chain reaction in leptospirosis diagnosis: association of level of leptospiremia and clinical manifestations in Sri Lanka. Clin Infect Dis. 2012; 54(9):1249-55. PMC: 3404689. DOI: 10.1093/cid/cis035. View

4.
Musso D, La Scola B . Laboratory diagnosis of leptospirosis: a challenge. J Microbiol Immunol Infect. 2013; 46(4):245-52. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmii.2013.03.001. View

5.
Bourhy P, Vray M, Picardeau M . Evaluation of an in-house ELISA using the intermediate species Leptospira fainei for diagnosis of leptospirosis. J Med Microbiol. 2013; 62(Pt 6):822-827. DOI: 10.1099/jmm.0.054304-0. View