» Articles » PMID: 32914024

Prospective Longitudinal CtDNA Workflow Reveals Clinically Actionable Alterations in Ovarian Cancer

Abstract

Purpose: Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) detection is a minimally invasive technique that offers dynamic molecular snapshots of genomic alterations in cancer. Although ctDNA markers can be used for early detection of cancers or for monitoring treatment efficacy, the value of ctDNA in guiding treatment decisions in solid cancers is controversial. Here, we monitored ctDNA to detect clinically actionable alterations during treatment of high-grade serous ovarian cancer, the most common and aggressive form of epithelial ovarian cancer with a 5-year survival rate of 43%.

Patients And Methods: We implemented a clinical ctDNA workflow to detect clinically actionable alterations in more than 500 cancer-related genes. We applied the workflow to a prospective cohort consisting of 78 ctDNA samples from 12 patients with high-grade serous ovarian cancer before, during, and after treatment. These longitudinal data sets were analyzed using our open-access ctDNA-tailored bioinformatics analysis pipeline and in-house Translational Oncology Knowledgebase to detect clinically actionable genomic alterations. The alterations were ranked according to the European Society for Medical Oncology scale for clinical actionability of molecular targets.

Results: Our results show good concordance of mutations and copy number alterations in ctDNA and tumor samples, and alterations associated with clinically available drugs were detected in seven patients (58%). Treatment of one chemoresistant patient was changed on the basis of detection of amplification, and this ctDNA-guided decision was followed by significant tumor shrinkage and complete normalization of the cancer antigen 125 tumor marker.

Conclusion: Our results demonstrate a proof of concept for using ctDNA to guide clinical decisions. Furthermore, our results show that longitudinal ctDNA samples can be used to identify poor-responding patients after first cycles of chemotherapy. We provide what we believe to be the first comprehensive, open-source ctDNA workflow for detecting clinically actionable alterations in solid cancers.

Citing Articles

Circulating Tumour DNA for Ovarian Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment Monitoring: What Perspectives for Clinical Use?.

Asante D, Tierno D, Grassi G, Scaggiante B Int J Mol Sci. 2025; 26(5).

PMID: 40076521 PMC: 11900478. DOI: 10.3390/ijms26051889.


ctDNA as an Objective Marker for Postoperative Residual Disease in Primary Advanced High-Grade Serous Ovarian Cancer.

Glueck V, Grimm C, Postl M, Brueffer C, Segui N, Alcaide M Cancers (Basel). 2025; 17(5).

PMID: 40075633 PMC: 11899276. DOI: 10.3390/cancers17050786.


Identification of Ovarian High-Grade Serous Carcinoma with Mitochondrial Gene Variation.

Gonzalez Bosquet J, Wagner V, Polio A, Linder K, Bender D, Goodheart M Int J Mol Sci. 2025; 26(3).

PMID: 39941116 PMC: 11818617. DOI: 10.3390/ijms26031347.


Clinical relevance of circulating tumor DNA in ovarian cancer: current issues and future opportunities.

Trevisi E, Sessa C, Colombo I Explor Target Antitumor Ther. 2024; 5(3):627-640.

PMID: 38966171 PMC: 11220313. DOI: 10.37349/etat.2024.00239.


Current Applications and Challenges of Next-Generation Sequencing in Plasma Circulating Tumour DNA of Ovarian Cancer.

Roque R, Ribeiro I, Figueiredo-Dias M, Gourley C, Carreira I Biology (Basel). 2024; 13(2).

PMID: 38392306 PMC: 10886635. DOI: 10.3390/biology13020088.


References
1.
Rondinelli B, Gogola E, Yucel H, Duarte A, van de Ven M, van der Sluijs R . EZH2 promotes degradation of stalled replication forks by recruiting MUS81 through histone H3 trimethylation. Nat Cell Biol. 2017; 19(11):1371-1378. DOI: 10.1038/ncb3626. View

2.
Cibulskis K, Lawrence M, Carter S, Sivachenko A, Jaffe D, Sougnez C . Sensitive detection of somatic point mutations in impure and heterogeneous cancer samples. Nat Biotechnol. 2013; 31(3):213-9. PMC: 3833702. DOI: 10.1038/nbt.2514. View

3.
Khan K, Cunningham D, Werner B, Vlachogiannis G, Spiteri I, Heide T . Longitudinal Liquid Biopsy and Mathematical Modeling of Clonal Evolution Forecast Time to Treatment Failure in the PROSPECT-C Phase II Colorectal Cancer Clinical Trial. Cancer Discov. 2018; 8(10):1270-1285. PMC: 6380469. DOI: 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-17-0891. View

4.
Siravegna G, Mussolin B, Buscarino M, Corti G, Cassingena A, Crisafulli G . Clonal evolution and resistance to EGFR blockade in the blood of colorectal cancer patients. Nat Med. 2015; 21(7):795-801. PMC: 4868598. DOI: 10.1038/nm.3870. View

5.
Mateo J, Chakravarty D, Dienstmann R, Jezdic S, Gonzalez-Perez A, Lopez-Bigas N . A framework to rank genomic alterations as targets for cancer precision medicine: the ESMO Scale for Clinical Actionability of molecular Targets (ESCAT). Ann Oncol. 2018; 29(9):1895-1902. PMC: 6158764. DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdy263. View