Background:
Only a few studies in the literature have reported patient-centered outcomes associated with minimally invasive corticotomy, and thus, related scientific evidence is limited.
Objectives:
The objective of this study was to evaluate patient-centered outcomes associated with upper canine retraction assisted with piezocision or laser-assisted flapless corticotomy (LAFC).
Material And Methods:
Thirty-two patients (19 females, 13 males) at a mean age of 18.25 ±3.05 years were randomly divided into 2 equal groups: the LAFC group (LG; n = 16) and the piezocision group (PG; n = 16). In each group, the surgical procedure was randomly assigned to one side of the maxillary arch, and the other side served as the control. Standardized questionnaires using the numerical rating scale (NRS) were distributed to all patients during the 1st month after the surgical procedure at 4 time points: 24 h (T1); 3 days (T2); 7 days (T3); and 14 days (T4). The patients' responses were obtained, regarding their feelings of pain, discomfort, swelling, eating difficulty, jaw movement restriction, analgesic consumption, and satisfaction.
Results:
The levels of pain, discomfort, swelling, and difficulty in chewing were significantly greater at the experimental sides as compared to the control sides only at T1 in both groups (p < 0.05). The levels of pain and discomfort in LG were significantly lower than those in PG only at T1 (p = 0.013 and p = 0.009, respectively) whereas there were no significant differences between the groups regarding swelling, eating difficulty, jaw movement restriction, and analgesic consumption. The patients in both groups reported high levels of satisfaction, with no significant differences. The levels of pain, discomfort, swelling, eating difficulty, and jaw movement restriction were dramatically decreased 1 day after flapless corticotomy treatment in both groups (p < 0.05).
Conclusions:
Both LAFC and piezocision were associated with high levels of pain, discomfort, swelling, and difficulty in chewing at T1. Laser-assisted flapless corticotomy caused less pain and discomfort than piezocision.
Citing Articles
Patient-Reported Outcomes of Orthodontic Treatment for Mild Crowding With Modified Aligner Appliance With Nickel-Titanium Springs: A Prospective Cohort Study.
Alhafi Z, Hajeer M, Burhan A, Latifeh Y, Ajaj M, Almusawi A
Cureus. 2024; 16(12):e76179.
PMID: 39711937
PMC: 11663397.
DOI: 10.7759/cureus.76179.
Patient Satisfaction Following Orthodontic Treatment: A Systematic Review.
Almasri A, Hajeer M, Ajaj M, Almusawi A, Jaber S, Zakaria A
Cureus. 2024; 16(7):e65339.
PMID: 39055972
PMC: 11271306.
DOI: 10.7759/cureus.65339.
Patient-reported outcomes during accelerating the en-masse retraction of the upper anterior teeth using low-intensity electrical stimulation: a randomized controlled trial.
Shaadouh R, Hajeer M, Mahmoud G, Almasri I, Jaber S, Alam M
Prog Orthod. 2024; 25(1):17.
PMID: 38735912
PMC: 11089026.
DOI: 10.1186/s40510-024-00517-3.
Evaluation of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) Associated With the Acceleration of Canine Retraction by Piezosurgery in Comparison With Low-Level Laser Therapy: A Three-Arm Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.
Alfailany D, Hajeer M, Awawdeh M, Alam M, Darwich K, Aljabban O
Cureus. 2024; 16(1):e51779.
PMID: 38192530
PMC: 10772303.
DOI: 10.7759/cureus.51779.
Patient-Reported Outcome Measures of Flapless Corticotomy with Low-Level Laser Therapy in En Masse Retraction of Upper Anterior Teeth: A Three-Arm Randomized Controlled Trial.
Mousa M, Hajeer M, Burhan A, Darwich K, Almahdi W, Aljabban O
Clin Pract. 2023; 13(6):1501-1519.
PMID: 38131681
PMC: 10742166.
DOI: 10.3390/clinpract13060132.
Automated artificial intelligence-based three-dimensional comparison of orthodontic treatment outcomes with and without piezocision surgery.
Gurgel M, Alvarez M, Aristizabal J, Baquero B, Gillot M, Al Turkestani N
Orthod Craniofac Res. 2023; 27(2):321-331.
PMID: 38009409
PMC: 10949222.
DOI: 10.1111/ocr.12737.
Comparative Efficacy of Traditional Corticotomy and Flapless Piezotomy in Facilitating Orthodontic Tooth Movement: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Han S, Park W, Park J
Medicina (Kaunas). 2023; 59(10).
PMID: 37893522
PMC: 10608606.
DOI: 10.3390/medicina59101804.
Evaluation of Patient-Centered Outcomes Associated With the Acceleration of en-Masse Retraction of Upper Anterior Teeth Assisted by Flapless Corticotomy Compared to Traditional Corticotomy: A Two-Arm Randomized Controlled Trial.
Khlef H, Mousa M, Ammar A, Hajeer M, Awawdeh M
Cureus. 2023; 15(7):e42273.
PMID: 37484791
PMC: 10361784.
DOI: 10.7759/cureus.42273.
The transparency of reporting 'harms' encountered with the surgically assisted acceleration of orthodontic tooth movement in the published randomized controlled trials: a meta-epidemiological study.
Alfailany D, Hajeer M, Darwich K
Prog Orthod. 2023; 24(1):11.
PMID: 36941520
PMC: 10027979.
DOI: 10.1186/s40510-023-00457-4.
Assessment of Dentoalveolar Changes Following Leveling and Alignment of Severely Crowded Upper Anterior Teeth Using Self-Ligating Brackets Alone or With Flapless Piezocision Compared to Traditional Brackets: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.
Al-Ibrahim H, Hajeer M, Burhan A, Haj Hamed Y, Alkhouri I, Zinah E
Cureus. 2023; 15(3):e35733.
PMID: 36875255
PMC: 9984186.
DOI: 10.7759/cureus.35733.
Pain, Discomfort, and Functional Impairments When Retracting Upper Anterior Teeth Using Two-Step Retraction With Transpalatal Arches Versus En-Masse Retraction With Mini-implants: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
Mousa M, Al-Sibaie S, Hajeer M
Cureus. 2023; 15(1):e33524.
PMID: 36636520
PMC: 9831618.
DOI: 10.7759/cureus.33524.
Evaluation of Perceived Pain, Discomfort, Functional Impairments, and Satisfaction When Relieving Crowded Lower Anterior Teeth in Young Adult Patients Using Corticision-Assisted Fixed Orthodontic Treatment: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
Sirri M, Burhan A, Hajeer M, Nawaya F
Cureus. 2022; 14(7):e26489.
PMID: 35815305
PMC: 9256009.
DOI: 10.7759/cureus.26489.
Evaluation of Patient-Centered Outcomes Associated With the Acceleration of Upper Incisor Decrowding Using Self-Ligating Brackets With or Without Piezocision in Comparison With Traditional Brackets: A Three-Arm Randomized Controlled Trial.
Al-Ibrahim H, Hajeer M, Burhan A, Alkhouri I, Latifeh Y
Cureus. 2022; 14(6):e26467.
PMID: 35785015
PMC: 9249031.
DOI: 10.7759/cureus.26467.
Evaluation of the Oral Health-Related Quality of Life (OHRQoL) in Patients Undergoing Lingual Versus Labial Fixed Orthodontic Appliances: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.
Kara-Boulad J, Burhan A, Hajeer M, Khattab T, Nawaya F
Cureus. 2022; 14(3):e23379.
PMID: 35371870
PMC: 8938915.
DOI: 10.7759/cureus.23379.
Evaluation of the Functional Treatment of Patients With Skeletal Class II Malocclusion Using Low-Level Laser Therapy-Assisted Twin-Block Appliance: A Three-Arm Randomized Controlled Trial.
Abdulhadi A, Burhan A, Hajeer M, Hamadah O, Mahmoud G, Nawaya F
Cureus. 2022; 14(3):e23449.
PMID: 35345811
PMC: 8956494.
DOI: 10.7759/cureus.23449.
Effect of the photobiomodulation for acceleration of the orthodontic tooth movement: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Olmedo-Hernandez O, Mota-Rodriguez A, Torres-Rosas R, Argueta-Figueroa L
Lasers Med Sci. 2022; 37(5):2323-2341.
PMID: 35304644
DOI: 10.1007/s10103-022-03538-8.
Assessment of Patient-Centered Outcomes When Treating Maxillary Constriction Using a Slow Removable Versus a Rapid Fixed Expansion Appliance in the Adolescence Period: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
Rabah N, Al-Ibrahim H, Hajeer M, Ajaj M, Mahmoud G
Cureus. 2022; 14(3):e22793.
PMID: 35261839
PMC: 8893008.
DOI: 10.7759/cureus.22793.
Systematic Review: Is High-Energy Laser Therapy (HELT) With Flapless Corticotomy Effective in Accelerating Orthodontic Tooth Movement?.
Shaadouh R, Hajeer M, Mahmoud G, Murad R
Cureus. 2022; 14(2):e22337.
PMID: 35198339
PMC: 8853717.
DOI: 10.7759/cureus.22337.