» Articles » PMID: 32907814

Preventing Ovarian Cancer Through Early Excision of Tubes and Late Ovarian Removal (PROTECTOR): Protocol for a Prospective Non-randomised Multi-center Trial

Abstract

Background: Risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy is the 'gold standard' for preventing tubo-ovarian cancer in women at increased risk. However, when performed in pre-menopausal women, it results in premature menopause and associated detrimental health consequences. This, together with acceptance of the central role of the fallopian tube in etiopathogenesis of high-grade serous carcinoma, by far the most common type of tubo-ovarian cancer, has led to risk-reducing early salpingectomy with delayed oophorectomy being proposed as a two-step surgical alternative for pre-menopausal women declining/delaying oophorectomy.

Primary Objective: To evaluate the impact on sexual function of risk-reducing early salpingectomy, within a two-step, risk-reducing, early salpingectomy with delayed oophorectomy tubo-ovarian cancer prevention strategy in pre-menopausal women at increased risk of tubo-ovarian cancer.

Study Hypothesis: Risk-reducing early salpingectomy is non-inferior for sexual and endocrine function compared with controls; risk-reducing early salpingectomy is superior for sexual/endocrine function, non-inferior for quality-of-life, and equivalent in satisfaction to the standard risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy.

Trial Design: Multi-center, observational cohort trial with three arms: risk-reducing early salpingectomy with delayed oophorectomy; risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy; controls (no surgery). Consenting individuals undergo an ultrasound, serum CA125, and follicle-stimulating hormone measurements and provide information on medical history, family history, quality-of-life, sexual function, cancer worry, psychological well-being, and satisfaction/regret. Follow-up by questionnaire takes place annually for 3 years. Women receiving risk-reducing early salpingectomy can undergo delayed oophorectomy at a later date of their choosing, or definitely by the menopause.

Major Inclusion/exclusion Criteria: Inclusion criteria: pre-menopausal; aged >30 years; at increased risk of tubo-ovarian cancer (mutation carriers or on the basis of a strong family history); completed their family (for surgical arms).

Exclusion Criteria: post-menopausal; previous bilateral salpingectomy or bilateral oophorectomy; pregnancy; previous tubal/ovarian/peritoneal malignancy; <12 months after cancer treatment; clinical suspicion of tubal/ovarian cancer at baseline.

Primary Endpoint: Sexual function measured by validated questionnaires.

Sample Size: 1000 (333 per arm).

Estimated Dates For Completing Accrual And Presenting Results: It is estimated recruitment will be completed by 2023 and results published by 2027.

Trial Registration Number: ISRCTN registry: 25 173 360 (https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN25173360).

Citing Articles

Prevention of Ovarian Cancer: Where are We Now and Where are We Going?.

Rodriguez I, Ghezelayagh T, Pennington K, Norquist B Curr Oncol Rep. 2024; 26(11):1355-1366.

PMID: 39115678 DOI: 10.1007/s11912-024-01587-6.


Risk-reducing salpingectomy with delayed oophorectomy to prevent ovarian cancer in women with an increased inherited risk: insights into an alternative strategy.

Gootzen T, Steenbeek M, van Bommel M, IntHout J, Kets C, Hermens R Fam Cancer. 2024; 23(4):437-445.

PMID: 38907139 PMC: 11512845. DOI: 10.1007/s10689-024-00412-0.


Utility Scores for Risk-Reducing Mastectomy and Risk-Reducing Salpingo-Oophorectomy: Mapping to EQ-5D.

Oxley S, Wei X, Sideris M, Blyuss O, Kalra A, Sia J Cancers (Basel). 2024; 16(7).

PMID: 38611036 PMC: 11010846. DOI: 10.3390/cancers16071358.


Screening and prevention of ovarian cancer.

Sideris M, Menon U, Manchanda R Med J Aust. 2024; 220(5):264-274.

PMID: 38353066 PMC: 7617385. DOI: 10.5694/mja2.52227.


Cost-Effectiveness of Gene-Specific Prevention Strategies for Ovarian and Breast Cancer.

Wei X, Sun L, Slade E, Fierheller C, Oxley S, Kalra A JAMA Netw Open. 2024; 7(2):e2355324.

PMID: 38334999 PMC: 10858404. DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.55324.


References
1.
Gaba F, Manchanda R . Systematic review of acceptability, cardiovascular, neurological, bone health and HRT outcomes following risk reducing surgery in BRCA carriers. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2020; 65:46-65. DOI: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2020.01.006. View

2.
Burke W, Coughlin S, Lee N, Weed D, Khoury M . Application of population screening principles to genetic screening for adult-onset conditions. Genet Test. 2002; 5(3):201-11. DOI: 10.1089/10906570152742245. View

3.
Thirlaway K, Fallowfield L, Cuzick J . The Sexual Activity Questionnaire: a measure of women's sexual functioning. Qual Life Res. 1996; 5(1):81-90. DOI: 10.1007/BF00435972. View

4.
Kuchenbaecker K, Hopper J, Barnes D, Phillips K, Mooij T, Roos-Blom M . Risks of Breast, Ovarian, and Contralateral Breast Cancer for BRCA1 and BRCA2 Mutation Carriers. JAMA. 2017; 317(23):2402-2416. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2017.7112. View

5.
Gan C, Chenoy R, Chandrasekaran D, Brockbank E, Hollingworth A, Vimplis S . Persistence of fimbrial tissue on the ovarian surface after salpingectomy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017; 217(4):425.e1-425.e16. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.06.004. View