» Articles » PMID: 32903548

Cytocompatibility Evaluation of a Novel Series of PEG-Functionalized Lactide-Caprolactone Copolymer Biomaterials for Cardiovascular Applications

Overview
Date 2020 Sep 9
PMID 32903548
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Although the use of bioresorbable materials in stent production is thought to improve long-term safety compared to their durable counterparts, a recent FDA report on the 2-year follow-up of the first FDA-approved bioresorbable vascular stent showed an increased occurrence of major adverse cardiac events and thrombosis in comparison to the metallic control. In order to overcome the issues of first generation bioresorbable polymers, a series of polyethylene glycol-functionalized poly-L-lactide-co-ε-caprolactone copolymers with varying lactide-to-caprolactone content is developed using a novel one-step PEG-functionalization and copolymerization strategy. This approach represents a new facile way toward surface enhancement for cellular interaction, which is shown by screening these materials regarding their cyto- and hemocompatibility in terms of cytotoxicity, hemolysis, platelet adhesion, leucocyte activation and endothelial cell adhesion. By varying the lactide-to-caprolactone polymer composition, it is possible to gradually affect endothelial and platelet adhesion which allows fine-tuning of the biological response based on polymer chemistry. All polymers developed were non-cytotoxic, had acceptable leucocyte activation levels and presented non-hemolytic (<2% hemolysis rate) behavior except for PLCL-PEG 55:45 which presented hemolysis rate of 2.5% ± 0.5. Water contact angles were reduced in the polymers containing PEG functionalization (PLLA-PEG: 69.8° ± 2.3, PCL-PEG: 61.2° ± 7.5) versus those without (PLLA: 79.5° ± 3.2, PCL: 76.4° ± 10.2) while the materials PCL-PEG550, PLCL-PEG550 90:10 and PLCL-PEG550 70:30 demonstrated best endothelial cell adhesion. PLLA-PEG550 and PLCL-PEG550 70:30 presented as best candidates for cardiovascular implant use from a cytocompatibility perspective across the spectrum of testing completed. Altogether, these polymers are excellent innovative materials suited for an application in stent manufacture due to the ease in translation of this one-step synthesis strategy to device production and their excellent cyto- and hemocompatibility.

Citing Articles

Therapeutic functions of medical implants from various material categories with integrated biomacromolecular systems.

Calais G, Garcia G, de Moura Junior C, Soares J, Lona L, Beppu M Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2025; 12:1509397.

PMID: 39867472 PMC: 11757644. DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2024.1509397.


Development of Biomimetic Substrates for Limbal Epithelial Stem Cells Using Collagen-Based Films, Hyaluronic Acid, Immortalized Cells, and Macromolecular Crowding.

Gurdal M, Ercan G, Selver O, Aberdam D, Zeugolis D Life (Basel). 2025; 14(12.

PMID: 39768260 PMC: 11678493. DOI: 10.3390/life14121552.


biocompatibility analysis of protein-resistant amphiphilic polysulfobetaines as coatings for surgical implants in contact with complex body fluids.

Karthauser J, Gruhn D, Martinez Guajardo A, Kopecz R, Babel N, Stervbo U Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2024; 12:1403654.

PMID: 39086500 PMC: 11288920. DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2024.1403654.


Bottlebrush polymers with flexible enantiomeric side chains display differential biological properties.

Nguyen H, Jiang Y, Mohapatra S, Wang W, Barnes J, Oldenhuis N Nat Chem. 2021; 14(1):85-93.

PMID: 34824461 PMC: 9122101. DOI: 10.1038/s41557-021-00826-8.


Predicting the In Vivo Performance of Cardiovascular Biomaterials: Current Approaches In Vitro Evaluation of Blood-Biomaterial Interactions.

Strohbach A, Busch R Int J Mol Sci. 2021; 22(21).

PMID: 34768821 PMC: 8583792. DOI: 10.3390/ijms222111390.

References
1.
van Oeveren W . Obstacles in haemocompatibility testing. Scientifica (Cairo). 2013; 2013:392584. PMC: 3820147. DOI: 10.1155/2013/392584. View

2.
Lieb E, Tessmar J, Hacker M, Fischbach C, Rose D, Blunk T . Poly(D,L-lactic acid)-poly(ethylene glycol)-monomethyl ether diblock copolymers control adhesion and osteoblastic differentiation of marrow stromal cells. Tissue Eng. 2003; 9(1):71-84. DOI: 10.1089/107632703762687555. View

3.
Neuss S, Apel C, Buttler P, Denecke B, Dhanasingh A, Ding X . Assessment of stem cell/biomaterial combinations for stem cell-based tissue engineering. Biomaterials. 2007; 29(3):302-13. DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.09.022. View

4.
Meraj P, Jauhar R, Singh A . Bare Metal Stents Versus Drug Eluting Stents: Where Do We Stand in 2015?. Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med. 2015; 17(8):393. DOI: 10.1007/s11936-015-0393-y. View

5.
Jeong S, Kim B, Kang S, Kwon J, Lee Y, Kim S . In vivo biocompatibilty and degradation behavior of elastic poly(L-lactide-co-epsilon-caprolactone) scaffolds. Biomaterials. 2004; 25(28):5939-46. DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.01.057. View