» Articles » PMID: 32902743

Clinical Pre-test Probability for Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease: Insights from the European DISCHARGE Pilot Study

Abstract

Objectives: To test the accuracy of clinical pre-test probability (PTP) for prediction of obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) in a pan-European setting.

Methods: Patients with suspected CAD and stable chest pain who were clinically referred for invasive coronary angiography (ICA) or computed tomography (CT) were included by clinical sites participating in the pilot study of the European multi-centre DISCHARGE trial. PTP of CAD was determined using the Diamond-Forrester (D+F) prediction model initially introduced in 1979 and the updated D+F model from 2011. Obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) was defined by one at least 50% diameter coronary stenosis by both CT and ICA.

Results: In total, 1440 patients (654 female, 786 male) were included at 25 clinical sites from May 2014 until July 2017. Of these patients, 725 underwent CT, while 715 underwent ICA. Both prediction models overestimated the prevalence of obstructive CAD (31.7%, 456 of 1440 patients, PTP: initial D+F 58.9% (28.1-90.6%), updated D+F 47.3% (34.2-59.9%), both p < 0.001), but overestimation of disease prevalence was higher for the initial D+F (p < 0.001). The discriminative ability was higher for the updated D+F 2011 (AUC of 0.73 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.70-0.76 versus AUC of 0.70 CI 0.67-0.73 for the initial D+F; p < 0.001; odds ratio (or) 1.55 CI 1.29-1.86, net reclassification index 0.11 CI 0.05-0.16, p < 0.001).

Conclusions: Clinical PTP calculation using the initial and updated D+F prediction models relevantly overestimates the actual prevalence of obstructive CAD in patients with stable chest pain clinically referred for ICA and CT suggesting that further refinements to improve clinical decision-making are needed.

Trial Registration: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02400229 KEY POINTS: • Clinical pre-test probability calculation using the initial and updated D+F model overestimates the prevalence of obstructive CAD identified by ICA and CT. • Overestimation of disease prevalence is higher for the initial D+F compared with the updated D+F. • Diagnostic accuracy of PTP assessment varies strongly between different clinical sites throughout Europe.

Citing Articles

ESC pre-test probability estimates for obstructive coronary artery disease: can they be used in Brazil?.

Erthal F, Lima R, Penna F, Chow B, Gismondi R Eur Heart J Imaging Methods Pract. 2024; 2(3):qyae075.

PMID: 39224621 PMC: 11367947. DOI: 10.1093/ehjimp/qyae075.


Early-stage health technology assessment of fractional flow reserve coronary computed tomography versus standard diagnostics in patients with stable chest pain in The Netherlands.

Boot I, Planken R, den Hartog A, Vrijhoef H PLoS One. 2024; 19(6):e0305189.

PMID: 38870138 PMC: 11175410. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0305189.


Computed tomography coronary angiography after excluding myocardial infarction: high-sensitivity troponin versus risk score-guided approach.

Yoo W, Ahn S, Chae B, Kim W World J Emerg Med. 2023; 14(6):428-433.

PMID: 37969225 PMC: 10632764. DOI: 10.5847/wjem.j.1920-8642.2023.094.


Diagnostic and Therapeutic Strategies for Stable Coronary Artery Disease Following the ISCHEMIA Trial.

Kohsaka S, Ejiri K, Takagi H, Watanabe I, Gatate Y, Fukushima K JACC Asia. 2023; 3(1):15-30.

PMID: 36873769 PMC: 9982228. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacasi.2022.10.013.


Assessment of the Efficiency of Non-Invasive Diagnostic Imaging Modalities for Detecting Myocardial Ischemia in Patients Suspected of Having Stable Angina.

Iwata K, Ogasawara K Healthcare (Basel). 2023; 11(1).

PMID: 36611483 PMC: 9818638. DOI: 10.3390/healthcare11010023.


References
1.
Pryor D, Shaw L, McCants C, Lee K, Mark D, Harrell Jr F . Value of the history and physical in identifying patients at increased risk for coronary artery disease. Ann Intern Med. 1993; 118(2):81-90. DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-118-2-199301150-00001. View

2.
Knuuti J, Ballo H, Juarez-Orozco L, Saraste A, Kolh P, Rutjes A . The performance of non-invasive tests to rule-in and rule-out significant coronary artery stenosis in patients with stable angina: a meta-analysis focused on post-test disease probability. Eur Heart J. 2018; 39(35):3322-3330. DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehy267. View

3.
Pugliese F, Mollet N, Runza G, Van Mieghem C, Meijboom W, Malagutti P . Diagnostic accuracy of non-invasive 64-slice CT coronary angiography in patients with stable angina pectoris. Eur Radiol. 2005; 16(3):575-82. DOI: 10.1007/s00330-005-0041-0. View

4.
Williams M, Hunter A, Shah A, Assi V, Lewis S, Smith J . Use of Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography to Guide Management of Patients With Coronary Disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016; 67(15):1759-1768. PMC: 4829708. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2016.02.026. View

5.
Genders T, Steyerberg E, Alkadhi H, Leschka S, Desbiolles L, Nieman K . A clinical prediction rule for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease: validation, updating, and extension. Eur Heart J. 2011; 32(11):1316-30. DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehr014. View