» Articles » PMID: 32899122

Soybean Plant Metabolism Under Water Deficit and Xenobiotic and Antioxidant Agent Application

Overview
Journal Biology (Basel)
Publisher MDPI
Specialty Biology
Date 2020 Sep 9
PMID 32899122
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The aim was to evaluate the interactive effects on biochemistry and physiology of soybean plants exposed to simultaneous xenobiotic and water deficit stresses, and the possible attenuation of plant damage by an antioxidant agent. Soybean plants were submitted to eight different soil water potentials, in two experiments (first experiment: -0.96, -0.38, -0.07, -0.02 MPa, and second experiment: -3.09, -1.38, -0.69, -0.14 MPa), xenobiotic, and antioxidant agent applications. Was observed a reduction in water status, gas exchange, photosynthetic pigments, photosystem II quantum yield, and increased leaf temperature in plants under low water availability. Water deficit also induced oxidative stress by the increased production of reactive oxygen species, cellular and molecular damage, and induction of the antioxidant defense metabolism, reduction of gas exchange, water status, and photosynthetic efficiency. The xenobiotic application also caused changes, with deleterious effects more pronounced in low soil water availability, mainly the reactive oxygen species production, consequently the antioxidant activity, and the oxidative damages. This indicates different responses to the combination of stresses. Antioxidant enzyme activity was reduced by the application of the antioxidant agent. Principal Component Analysis showed a relation with the antioxidant agent and reactive oxygen species, which is probably due to signaling function, and with defense antioxidant system, mainly glutathione, represented by thiols.

Citing Articles

Changes in physio-biochemical metabolism, phenolics and antioxidant capacity during germination of different wheat varieties.

Li W, Liu X, Ma Y, Huang X, Hai D, Cheng Y Food Chem X. 2024; 22:101429.

PMID: 38756466 PMC: 11096995. DOI: 10.1016/j.fochx.2024.101429.


Genetic control of tolerance to drought stress in soybean.

Saleem A, Roldan-Ruiz I, Aper J, Muylle H BMC Plant Biol. 2022; 22(1):615.

PMID: 36575367 PMC: 9795773. DOI: 10.1186/s12870-022-03996-w.


Effects of Weak and Strong Drought Conditions on Physiological Stability of Flowering Soybean.

Song S, Qu Z, Zhou X, Wang X, Dong S Plants (Basel). 2022; 11(20).

PMID: 36297732 PMC: 9607976. DOI: 10.3390/plants11202708.


Artificial Intelligence Assisted Ultrasonic Extraction of Total Flavonoids from .

Liu J, Li C, Ding G, Quan W Molecules. 2021; 26(13).

PMID: 34201870 PMC: 8270336. DOI: 10.3390/molecules26133835.

References
1.
Akter S, Huang J, Waszczak C, Jacques S, Gevaert K, Van Breusegem F . Cysteines under ROS attack in plants: a proteomics view. J Exp Bot. 2015; 66(10):2935-44. DOI: 10.1093/jxb/erv044. View

2.
Teixeira W, Fagan E, Soares L, Umburanas R, Reichardt K, Neto D . Foliar and Seed Application of Amino Acids Affects the Antioxidant Metabolism of the Soybean Crop. Front Plant Sci. 2017; 8:327. PMC: 5359285. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2017.00327. View

3.
Mittler R . ROS Are Good. Trends Plant Sci. 2016; 22(1):11-19. DOI: 10.1016/j.tplants.2016.08.002. View

4.
Katam R, Shokri S, Murthy N, Singh S, Suravajhala P, Khan M . Proteomics, physiological, and biochemical analysis of cross tolerance mechanisms in response to heat and water stresses in soybean. PLoS One. 2020; 15(6):e0233905. PMC: 7274410. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0233905. View

5.
Ma X, Wang G, Zhao W, Yang M, Ma N, Kong F . SlCOR413IM1: A novel cold-regulation gene from tomato, enhances drought stress tolerance in tobacco. J Plant Physiol. 2017; 216:88-99. DOI: 10.1016/j.jplph.2017.03.016. View