» Articles » PMID: 32891825

Impact of Surgical Wait Time to Hysterectomy for Benign Gynecologic Disease

Overview
Publisher Elsevier
Date 2020 Sep 6
PMID 32891825
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Study Objective: To determine the impact of surgical wait time on healthcare use and surgical outcomes for patients undergoing hysterectomy for benign gynecologic indications.

Design: Retrospective cohort study.

Setting: Urban, academic tertiary care center.

Patients: Patients who underwent hysterectomy for benign disease between 2012 and 2018.

Interventions: None.

Measurements And Main Results: Patients were categorized into 2 groups, dichotomized by surgical wait times >30 days or ≤30 days. Healthcare use was measured by the number of discrete patient interactions with the healthcare system through phone calls, secure electronic messaging, and office and emergency room visits. Univariate and multivariable logistic regression models were performed to assess the association between surgical wait time and healthcare use and perioperative outcomes while controlling for confounders. A total of 277 patients were included in our analysis: 106 (38.3%) had surgical wait times >30 days (median 47 days, range 24-68 days), and 171 (67.1%) had surgical wait times ≤30 days (median 19 days; range 12-26 days). The groups did not differ by age, insurance status, substance use, or comorbid conditions. Patients in the group with surgical wait times >30 days were more likely to have increased healthcare use (69 of 106, 65% vs 43 of 171, 25%; odds ratio 5.55; 95% confidence interval, 3.27-9.41). There were no differences in intraoperative complications (9 of 106, 8% vs 19 of 171, 11%; p = .482) or postoperative complications (28 of 106, 26% vs 32 of 171, 19%; p = .13) between the groups; however, after controlling for potential confounders, patients with surgical wait times >30 days were 3.22 times more likely to be readmitted than patients with surgical wait times ≤30 days (95% confidence interval, 1.27-8.19).

Conclusion: A surgical wait time >30 days in patients undergoing a hysterectomy for benign disease is associated with increased healthcare use in the interim. Although patients who experience longer surgical wait times do not experience worse surgical outcomes, they may be at higher risk for readmission after surgery. Targeted interventions to optimize perioperative coordination of care for patients undergoing a hysterectomy for benign disease, especially those within vulnerable populations, are needed to improve quality of care, decrease any redundant or inefficient healthcare use, and reduce any unnecessary delays.

Citing Articles

Socioeconomic factors influence surgical wait times for non-emergent gynecologic surgical procedures: a retrospective analysis.

Kinsey E, Hardart A, Dabney L, Khalil S, Kaplowitz E, Brustman L BMC Womens Health. 2024; 24(1):115.

PMID: 38347521 PMC: 10863262. DOI: 10.1186/s12905-023-02806-1.


The impact of delaying surgery during the COVID-19 pandemic in Alberta: a qualitative study.

Sauro K, Smith C, Kersen J, Schalm E, Jaworska N, Roach P CMAJ Open. 2023; 11(1):E90-E100.

PMID: 36720492 PMC: 9894654. DOI: 10.9778/cmajo.20210330.


A comparison of patient-reported outcomes among Canadian women having hysterectomies.

Saleeb M, Mohtashami F, Gadermann A, Murphy R, Flexman A, Crump T Qual Life Res. 2022; 32(3):759-768.

PMID: 36547860 DOI: 10.1007/s11136-022-03326-5.


Patient waiting time analysis for elective gynecologic surgeries in a tertiary training hospital in the Philippines: A retrospective cross-sectional study.

de Guzman G, Sia Su M Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2022; 81:104403.

PMID: 36147116 PMC: 9486574. DOI: 10.1016/j.amsu.2022.104403.

References
1.
Sheyn D, El-Nashar S, Billow M, Mahajan S, Duarte M, Pollard R . Readmission Rates after Same-Day Discharge Compared with Postoperative Day 1 Discharge after Benign Laparoscopic Hysterectomy. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2017; 25(3):484-490. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmig.2017.10.013. View

2.
Leong Y, Kotani S, Best C, Diamond P, Lovatsis D, Drutz H . A Comparison of Health-Related Quality of Life of Women Awaiting Pelvic Organ Prolapse Surgery versus Hip or Knee Replacement. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2017; 39(5):341-346. DOI: 10.1016/j.jogc.2017.01.005. View

3.
Friedman G . Natural history of asymptomatic and symptomatic gallstones. Am J Surg. 1993; 165(4):399-404. DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9610(05)80930-4. View

4.
Strohl A, Feinglass J, Shahabi S, Simon M . Surgical wait time: A new health indicator in women with endometrial cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2016; 141(3):511-515. PMC: 5989709. DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2016.04.014. View

5.
Radosa J, Meyberg-Solomayer G, Kastl C, Radosa C, Mavrova R, Graber S . Influences of different hysterectomy techniques on patients' postoperative sexual function and quality of life. J Sex Med. 2014; 11(9):2342-50. DOI: 10.1111/jsm.12623. View