» Articles » PMID: 32889641

Learning Inguinal Hernia Repair? A Survey of Current Practice and of Preferred Methods of Surgical Residents

Overview
Journal Hernia
Publisher Springer
Date 2020 Sep 5
PMID 32889641
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: During surgical residency, many learning methods are available to learn an inguinal hernia repair (IHR). This study aimed to investigate which learning methods are most commonly used and which are perceived as most important by surgical residents for open and endoscopic IHR.

Methods: European general surgery residents were invited to participate in a 9-item web-based survey that inquired which of the learning methods were used (checking one or more of 13 options) and what their perceived importance was on a 5-point Likert scale (1 = completely not important to 5 = very important).

Results: In total, 323 residents participated. The five most commonly used learning methods for open and endoscopic IHR were apprenticeship style learning in the operation room (OR) (98% and 96%, respectively), textbooks (67% and 49%, respectively), lectures (50% and 44%, respectively), video-demonstrations (53% and 66%, respectively) and journal articles (54% and 54%, respectively). The three most important learning methods for the open and endoscopic IHR were participation in the OR [5.00 (5.00-5.00) and 5.00 (5.00-5.00), respectively], video-demonstrations [4.00 (4.00-5.00) and 4.00 (4.00-5.00), respectively], and hands-on hernia courses [4.00 (4.00-5.00) and 4.00 (4.00-5.00), respectively].

Conclusion: This study demonstrated a discrepancy between learning methods that are currently used by surgical residents to learn the open and endoscopic IHR and preferred learning methods. There is a need for more emphasis on practising before entering the OR. This would support surgical residents' training by first observing, then practising and finally performing the surgery in the OR.

Citing Articles

RAWS4all project: validation of a new silicone model for robotic TAPP inguinal hernia repair.

Goncalves M, Morales-Conde S, Reis S, Carlos Alves P, Novo de Matos J, Oliveira A Surg Endosc. 2023; 38(3):1329-1341.

PMID: 38110794 PMC: 10881695. DOI: 10.1007/s00464-023-10592-y.


Assessing knowledge and confidence of surgical residents in inguinal hernia repair using a low-cost synthetic model.

Fadipe A, Parker R, Tchinde M, Eisenhut D, Parker A Hernia. 2023; 27(6):1461-1466.

PMID: 37725187 DOI: 10.1007/s10029-023-02883-z.


Increasing volume but declining resident autonomy in laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: an inverse relationship.

Sehat A, Oliver J, Yu Y, Kunac A, Anjaria D Surg Endosc. 2022; 37(4):3119-3126.

PMID: 35931892 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-022-09476-4.

References
1.
Davis J, Garcia G, Wyckoff M, Alsafran S, Graygo J, Withum K . Use of mobile learning module improves skills in chest tube insertion. J Surg Res. 2012; 177(1):21-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2012.03.022. View

2.
Evans C, Schenarts K . Evolving Educational Techniques in Surgical Training. Surg Clin North Am. 2015; 96(1):71-88. DOI: 10.1016/j.suc.2015.09.005. View

3.
Sanders A, Warntjes P, Geelkerken R, Mastboom W, Klaase J, Rodel S . Open surgery in VR: inguinal hernia repair according to Lichtenstein. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2006; 119:477-9. View

4.
Farag M, Bolton D, Lawrentschuk N . Use of YouTube as a Resource for Surgical Education-Clarity or Confusion. Eur Urol Focus. 2019; 6(3):445-449. DOI: 10.1016/j.euf.2019.09.017. View

5.
Abdelrahman T, Long J, Egan R, Lewis W . Operative Experience vs. Competence: A Curriculum Concordance and Learning Curve Analysis. J Surg Educ. 2016; 73(4):694-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2016.01.011. View