» Articles » PMID: 32889634

Non-invasive Cardiac Allograft Rejection Surveillance: Reliability and Clinical Value for Prevention of Heart Failure

Overview
Journal Heart Fail Rev
Date 2020 Sep 5
PMID 32889634
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Allograft rejection-related acute and chronic heart failure (HF) is a major cause of death in heart transplant recipients. Given the deleterious impact of late recognized acute rejection (AR) or non-recognized asymptomatic antibody-mediated rejection on short- and long-term allograft function improvement of AR surveillance and optimization of action strategies for confirmed AR can prevent AR-related allograft failure and delay the development of cardiac allograft vasculopathy, which is the major cause for HF after the first posttransplant year. Routine non-invasive monitoring of cardiac function can improve both detection and functional severity grading of AR. It can also be helpful in guiding the anti-AR therapy and timing of routine surveillance endomyocardial biopsies (EMBs). The combined use of EMBs with non-invasive technologies and methods, which allow detection of subclinical alterations in myocardial function (e.g., tissue Doppler imaging and speckle-tracking echocardiography), reveal alloimmune activation (e.g., screening of complement-activating donor-specific antibodies and circulating donor-derived cell-free DNA) and help in predicting the imminent risk of immune-mediated injury (e.g., gene expression profiling, screening of non-HLA antibodies, and circulating donor-derived cell-free DNA), can ensure the best possible surveillance and management of AR. This article gives an overview of the current knowledge about the reliability and clinical value of non-invasive cardiac allograft AR surveillance. Particular attention is focused on the potential usefulness of non-invasive tools and techniques for detection and functional grading of early and late ARs in asymptomatic patients. Overall, the review aimed to provide a theoretical and practical basis for those engaged in this particularly demanding up-to-date topic.

Citing Articles

Reference values of strain-derived myocardial work indices in heart transplant patients.

Mandoli G, Landra F, Tanzi L, Martini L, Fusi C, Sciaccaluga C Eur Heart J Imaging Methods Pract. 2024; 2(3):qyae091.

PMID: 39391531 PMC: 11465170. DOI: 10.1093/ehjimp/qyae091.


Transplantation versus Long-Term Left- or Bi-Ventricular Assist Device Implantation: Major Challenges for Decision-Makers.

Dandel M Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2024; 23(9):321.

PMID: 39077694 PMC: 11262372. DOI: 10.31083/j.rcm2309321.


Heart transplantation and anti-HLA antibodY: myocardial dysfunction and prognosis - HeartLAy study.

Sciaccaluga C, Natali B, Righini F, Dini C, Landra F, Mandoli G ESC Heart Fail. 2023; 10(5):2853-2864.

PMID: 37415291 PMC: 10567642. DOI: 10.1002/ehf2.14442.


Bioinformatics Identification of Candidate Biomarkers in Endomyocardial Biopsy and Peripheral Blood for Cardiac Allograft Rejection.

Luo K, Li L, Meng M, Chen Y, Hou Z Ann Transplant. 2022; 27:e935488.

PMID: 35347104 PMC: 8976446. DOI: 10.12659/AOT.935488.

References
1.
Yilmaz A, Kindermann I, Kindermann M, Mahfoud F, Ukena C, Athanasiadis A . Comparative evaluation of left and right ventricular endomyocardial biopsy: differences in complication rate and diagnostic performance. Circulation. 2010; 122(9):900-9. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.924167. View

2.
Levin H, Kasper E, Rayburn B, Herskowitz A, Baughman K . Complications of endomyocardial biopsy in heart transplant patients. J Heart Lung Transplant. 1993; 12(1 Pt 1):63-7. View

3.
Miller C, Fildes J, Ray S, Doran H, Yonan N, Williams S . Non-invasive approaches for the diagnosis of acute cardiac allograft rejection. Heart. 2012; 99(7):445-53. DOI: 10.1136/heartjnl-2012-302759. View

4.
Eckart R, Kolasa M, Khan N, Kwan M, Peele M . Surface electrocardiography and histologic rejection following orthotopic heart transplantation. Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol. 2005; 10(1):60-4. PMC: 6932073. DOI: 10.1111/j.1542-474X.2005.00601.x. View

5.
Lacroix D, Kacet S, Savard P, Molin F, Dagano J, Pol A . Signal-averaged electrocardiography and detection of heart transplant rejection: comparison of time and frequency domain analyses. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1992; 19(3):553-8. DOI: 10.1016/s0735-1097(10)80272-4. View