» Articles » PMID: 32884496

Limits on Composition of Conceptual Operations in 9-month-olds

Overview
Journal Infancy
Date 2020 Sep 5
PMID 32884496
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Complex systems are often built from a relatively small set of basic features or operations that can be combined in myriad ways. We investigated the developmental origins of this compositional architecture in 9-month-old infants, extending recent work that demonstrated rudimentary compositional abilities in preschoolers. Infants viewed two separate object-occlusion events that depicted a single featurechange operation. They were then tested with a combined operation to determine whether they expected the outcome of the two feature changes, even though this combination was unfamiliar. In contrast to preschoolers, infants did appear to predictively compose these simple feature-change operations. A second experiment demonstrated the ability of infants to track two operations when not combined. The failure to compose basic operations is consistent with limitations on object tracking and early numerical cognition (Feigenson & Yamaguchi, 2009). We suggest that these results can be unified via a general principle: infants have difficulty with multiple updates to a representation of an unobservable.

Citing Articles

Evidence for compositional abilities in one-year-old infants.

Dautriche I, Chemla E Commun Psychol. 2025; 3(1):37.

PMID: 40065048 PMC: 11893465. DOI: 10.1038/s44271-025-00222-9.


Early-emerging combinatorial thought: Human infants flexibly combine kind and quantity concepts.

Pomiechowska B, Brody G, Teglas E, Kovacs A Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2024; 121(29):e2315149121.

PMID: 38980899 PMC: 11260156. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2315149121.


Human-like systematic generalization through a meta-learning neural network.

Lake B, Baroni M Nature. 2023; 623(7985):115-121.

PMID: 37880371 PMC: 10620072. DOI: 10.1038/s41586-023-06668-3.


A distributional perspective on the gavagai problem in early word learning.

Aslin R, Wang A Cognition. 2021; 213:104680.

PMID: 33853740 PMC: 8324554. DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2021.104680.


The relationship between non-symbolic multiplication and division in childhood.

McCrink K, Shafto P, Barth H Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2016; 70(4):686-702.

PMID: 26880261 PMC: 5228418. DOI: 10.1080/17470218.2016.1151060.

References
1.
Spelke E, Kinzler K . Core knowledge. Dev Sci. 2006; 10(1):89-96. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2007.00569.x. View

2.
Piantadosi S, Tenenbaum J, Goodman N . Bootstrapping in a language of thought: a formal model of numerical concept learning. Cognition. 2012; 123(2):199-217. DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2011.11.005. View

3.
Wellman H, Cross D, Bartsch K . Infant search and object permanence: a meta-analysis of the A-not-B error. Monogr Soc Res Child Dev. 1987; 51(3):1-67. View

4.
Kidd C, Piantadosi S, Aslin R . The Goldilocks effect: human infants allocate attention to visual sequences that are neither too simple nor too complex. PLoS One. 2012; 7(5):e36399. PMC: 3359326. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0036399. View

5.
Fodor J, McLaughlin B . Connectionism and the problem of systematicity: why Smolensky's solution doesn't work. Cognition. 1990; 35(2):183-204. DOI: 10.1016/0010-0277(90)90014-b. View