» Articles » PMID: 32884171

Effects of Instrument-assisted Soft-tissue Mobilization at Three Different Application Angles on Hamstring Surface Thermal Responses

Overview
Journal J Phys Ther Sci
Date 2020 Sep 5
PMID 32884171
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

[Purpose] This study aimed to examine the thermal skin responses (thermal buildup and retention rate) to instrument-assisted soft tissue mobilization (IASTM) procedures applied on hamstrings at different angles. [Participants and Methods] Thirty university students (age: 20 ± 4 years, weight: 70.61 ± 9.11 kg, height: 168.5 ± 7.5 cm) received three sessions of 10-min Ergon IASTM treatment on their dominant limbs' hamstrings at 20°, 60°, and 90° application angles, respectively. The skin temperature was measured with a thermometer immediately before and after treatment, and every minute thereafter until it returned to the baseline value. [Results] IASTM resulted in a significant increase in skin temperature irrespective of the application angle. The thermal retention rate produced by the treatment at a 90° angle was significantly higher than that produced by the 20° application angle (78.9 vs. 64.53 min). No significant differences were observed between the 60° and 90° angle applications (72.5 vs. 78.9 min). [Conclusion] IASTM application at 60° and 90° angles can increase and retain the hamstring's skin temperature for more than an hour, creating the conditions for potential positive adaptations to local metabolism and muscle tone.

Citing Articles

Comparison of instrument-assisted soft tissue mobilization and proprioceptive neuromuscular stretching on hamstring flexibility in patients with knee osteoarthritis.

Anjum N, Sheikh R, Omer A, Anwar K, Haider Khan M, Aftab A PeerJ. 2023; 11:e16506.

PMID: 38054019 PMC: 10695107. DOI: 10.7717/peerj.16506.


A comparative study of the efficacy of instrument-assisted soft tissue mobilization and massage techniques in patients with patellofemoral joint pain.

Liu Y, Wang Y Front Med (Lausanne). 2023; 10:1305733.

PMID: 38020090 PMC: 10679753. DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1305733.


Effect of instrument-assisted soft tissue mobilization combined with blood flow restriction training on function, pain and strength of patients with patellofemoral joint pain.

Liu Y, Wu L BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2023; 24(1):698.

PMID: 37653489 PMC: 10469828. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-023-06701-6.

References
1.
Portillo-Soto A, Eberman L, Demchak T, Peebles C . Comparison of blood flow changes with soft tissue mobilization and massage therapy. J Altern Complement Med. 2014; 20(12):932-6. DOI: 10.1089/acm.2014.0160. View

2.
Gillooly J, Brown J, WEST G, Savage V, Charnov E . Effects of size and temperature on metabolic rate. Science. 2001; 293(5538):2248-51. DOI: 10.1126/science.1061967. View

3.
Drust B, Atkinson G, Gregson W, French D, Binningsley D . The effects of massage on intra muscular temperature in the vastus lateralis in humans. Int J Sports Med. 2003; 24(6):395-9. DOI: 10.1055/s-2003-41182. View

4.
Laudner K, Compton B, McLoda T, Walters C . Acute effects of instrument assisted soft tissue mobilization for improving posterior shoulder range of motion in collegiate baseball players. Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2014; 9(1):1-7. PMC: 3924602. View

5.
Fousekis K, Eid K, Tafa E, Gkrilias P, Mylonas K, Angelopoulos P . Can the application of the Ergon IASTM treatment on remote parts of the superficial back myofascial line be equally effective with the local application for the improvement of the hamstrings' flexibility? A randomized control study. J Phys Ther Sci. 2019; 31(7):508-511. PMC: 6642894. DOI: 10.1589/jpts.31.508. View