» Articles » PMID: 32883724

How and Why a Multifaceted Intervention to Improve Adherence Post-MI Worked for Some (and Could Work Better for Others): an Outcome-driven Qualitative Process Evaluation

Overview
Journal BMJ Open
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2020 Sep 5
PMID 32883724
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: To explore (1) the extent to which a multicomponent intervention addressed determinants of the desired behaviours (ie, adherence to cardiac rehabilitation (CR) and cardiovascular medications), (2) the associated mechanism(s) of action and (3) how future interventions might be better designed to meet the needs of this patient population.

Design: A qualitative evaluation embedded within a multicentre randomised trial, involving purposive semistructured interviews.

Setting: Nine cardiac centres in Ontario, Canada.

Participants: Potential participants were stratified according to the trial's primary outcomes of engagement and adherence, resulting in three groups: (1) engaged, adherence outcome positive, (2) engaged, adherence outcome negative and (3) did not engage, adherence outcome negative. Participants who did not engage but had positive adherence outcomes were excluded. Individual domains of the Theoretical Domains Framework were applied as deductive codes and findings were analysed using a framework approach.

Results: Thirty-one participants were interviewed. Participants who were engaged with positive adherence outcomes attributed their success to the intervention's ability to activate determinants including behavioural regulation and knowledge, which encouraged an increase in self-monitoring behaviour and awareness of available supports, as well as reinforcement and social influences. The behaviour of those with negative adherence outcomes was driven by beliefs about consequences, emotions and identity. As currently designed, the intervention failed to target these determinants for this subset of participants, resulting in partial engagement and poor adherence outcomes.

Conclusion: The intervention facilitated CR adherence through reinforcement, behavioural regulation, the provision of knowledge and social influence. To reach a broader and more diverse population, future iterations of the intervention should target aberrant beliefs about consequences, memory and decision-making and emotion.

Trial Registration Number: ClinicalTrials.gov registry; NCT02382731.

Citing Articles

Protocol for the ONLOOP trial: pragmatic randomized trial evaluating a province-wide system of personalized reminders for evidence-based surveillance tests in adult survivors of childhood cancer in Ontario.

Shuldiner J, Lam E, Shah N, Grimshaw J, Desveaux L, Heisey R Implement Sci. 2024; 19(1):19.

PMID: 38395903 PMC: 10885391. DOI: 10.1186/s13012-024-01347-x.


Developing Implementation Strategies to Support the Uptake of a Risk Tool to Aid Physicians in the Clinical Management of Patients With Syncope: Systematic Theoretical and User-Centered Design Approach.

Rouleau G, Thiruganasambandamoorthy V, Wu K, Ghaedi B, Nguyen P, Desveaux L JMIR Hum Factors. 2023; 10:e44089.

PMID: 37310783 PMC: 10337431. DOI: 10.2196/44089.


Effectiveness of mHealth Interventions in Medication Adherence among Patients with Cardiovascular Diseases: A Systematic Review.

Arshed M, Mahmud A, Minhat H, Ying L, Umer M Diseases. 2023; 11(1).

PMID: 36975590 PMC: 10047328. DOI: 10.3390/diseases11010041.


Impacts of two behavior change interventions on determinants of medication adherence: process evaluation applying the health action process approach and habit theory alongside a randomized controlled trial.

McCleary N, Ivers N, Schwalm J, Witteman H, Taljaard M, Desveaux L J Behav Med. 2022; 45(5):659-673.

PMID: 35596020 DOI: 10.1007/s10865-022-00327-0.


Medication-taking for secondary prevention of acute myocardial infarction: a thematic meta-synthesis of patient experiences.

Piekarz H, Langran C, Raza A, Donyai P Open Heart. 2022; 9(1).

PMID: 35246500 PMC: 8900060. DOI: 10.1136/openhrt-2021-001939.


References
1.
Leon A, Franklin B, Costa F, Balady G, Berra K, Stewart K . Cardiac rehabilitation and secondary prevention of coronary heart disease: an American Heart Association scientific statement from the Council on Clinical Cardiology (Subcommittee on Exercise, Cardiac Rehabilitation, and Prevention) and the Council.... Circulation. 2005; 111(3):369-76. DOI: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000151788.08740.5C. View

2.
Perk J, De Backer G, Gohlke H, Graham I, Reiner Z, Verschuren W . European guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice (version 2012) : the fifth joint task force of the European society of cardiology and other societies on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice.... Int J Behav Med. 2012; 19(4):403-88. DOI: 10.1007/s12529-012-9242-5. View

3.
Gale N, Heath G, Cameron E, Rashid S, Redwood S . Using the framework method for the analysis of qualitative data in multi-disciplinary health research. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2013; 13:117. PMC: 3848812. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2288-13-117. View

4.
Witteman H, Presseau J, Nicholas Angl E, Jokhio I, Schwalm J, Grimshaw J . Negotiating Tensions Between Theory and Design in the Development of Mailings for People Recovering From Acute Coronary Syndrome. JMIR Hum Factors. 2017; 4(1):e6. PMC: 5352859. DOI: 10.2196/humanfactors.6502. View

5.
Smith J, Firth J . Qualitative data analysis: the framework approach. Nurse Res. 2011; 18(2):52-62. DOI: 10.7748/nr2011.01.18.2.52.c8284. View