» Articles » PMID: 32883207

Systematic Analysis Reveals Cis and Trans Determinants Affecting C-to-U RNA Editing in Arabidopsis Thaliana

Overview
Journal BMC Genet
Publisher Biomed Central
Date 2020 Sep 5
PMID 32883207
Citations 11
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: C-to-U RNA editing is prevalent in the mitochondrial and chloroplast genes in plants. The biological functions of a fraction of C-to-U editing sites are continuously discovered by case studies. However, at genome-wide level, the cis and trans determinants affecting the occurrence or editing levels of these C-to-U events are relatively less studied. What is known is that the PPR (pentatricopeptide repeat) proteins are the main trans-regulatory elements responsible for the C-to-U conversion, but other determinants especially the cis-regulatory elements remain largely uninvestigated.

Results: By analyzing the transcriptome and translatome data in Arabidopsis thaliana roots and shoots, combined with RNA-seq data from hybrids of Arabidopsis thaliana and Arabidopsis lyrata, we perform genome-wide investigation on the cis elements and trans-regulatory elements that potentially affect C-to-U editing events. An upstream guanosine or double-stranded RNA (dsRNA) regions are unfavorable for editing events. Meanwhile, many genes including the transcription factors may indirectly play regulatory roles in trans.

Conclusions: The 5-prime thymidine facilitates editing and dsRNA structures prevent editing in cis. Many transcription factors affect editing in trans. Although the detailed molecular mechanisms underlying the cis and trans regulation remain to be experimentally verified, our findings provide novel aspects in studying the botanical C-to-U RNA editing events.

Citing Articles

Convergent evolution of allele-specific gene expression that leads to non-small cell lung cancer in different human populations.

Hou Q, Shang L, Chen X, Luo Q, Wei L, Zhang C J Appl Genet. 2023; 65(3):493-504.

PMID: 38036772 DOI: 10.1007/s13353-023-00813-4.


A-to-I RNA editing shows dramatic up-regulation in osteosarcoma and broadly regulates tumor-related genes by altering microRNA target regions.

Ge F, Cao X, Jiang Y J Appl Genet. 2023; 64(3):493-505.

PMID: 37542613 DOI: 10.1007/s13353-023-00777-5.


Maize kernel development.

Dai D, Ma Z, Song R Mol Breed. 2023; 41(1):2.

PMID: 37309525 PMC: 10231577. DOI: 10.1007/s11032-020-01195-9.


COVID-19 and its genomic variants: Molecular pathogenesis and therapeutic interventions.

Manna P, Gray Z, Sikdar M, Reddy H EXCLI J. 2022; 21:1196-1221.

PMID: 36381644 PMC: 9650701. DOI: 10.17179/excli2022-5315.


Exploring the RNA Editing Events and Their Potential Regulatory Roles in Tea Plant ( L.).

Zhang M, Li Z, Wang Z, Xiao Y, Bao L, Wang M Int J Mol Sci. 2022; 23(21).

PMID: 36362430 PMC: 9654872. DOI: 10.3390/ijms232113640.


References
1.
Guo X, Gui Y, Wang Y, Zhu Q, Helliwell C, Fan L . Selection and mutation on microRNA target sequences during rice evolution. BMC Genomics. 2008; 9:454. PMC: 2567346. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2164-9-454. View

2.
Karcher D, Bock R . Temperature sensitivity of RNA editing and intron splicing reactions in the plastid ndhB transcript. Curr Genet. 2002; 41(1):48-52. DOI: 10.1007/s00294-002-0278-y. View

3.
Savva Y, Rieder L, Reenan R . The ADAR protein family. Genome Biol. 2013; 13(12):252. PMC: 3580408. DOI: 10.1186/gb-2012-13-12-252. View

4.
Chu D, Wei L . Reduced C-to-U RNA editing rates might play a regulatory role in stress response of Arabidopsis. J Plant Physiol. 2019; 244:153081. DOI: 10.1016/j.jplph.2019.153081. View

5.
Ramaswami G, Zhang R, Piskol R, Keegan L, Deng P, OConnell M . Identifying RNA editing sites using RNA sequencing data alone. Nat Methods. 2013; 10(2):128-32. PMC: 3676881. DOI: 10.1038/nmeth.2330. View