» Articles » PMID: 32875303

Assessment of Graft Maturity After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using Autografts: A Systematic Review of Biopsy and Magnetic Resonance Imaging Studies

Overview
Date 2020 Sep 3
PMID 32875303
Citations 15
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this investigation was to evaluate systematically the literature concerning biopsy, MRI signal to noise quotient (SNQ) and clinical outcomes in graft-maturity assessment after autograft anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) and their possible relationships.

Methods: The systematic review was reported and conducted according to the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. Studies through May 2019 evaluating methods of intra-articular ACL autograft maturity assessment were considered for inclusion. Eligible methods were histologic studies of biopsy specimens and conventional MRI studies reporting serial SNQ and/or correlation with clinical parameters.

Results: Ten biopsy studies and 13 imaging studies, with a total of 706 patients, met the inclusion criteria. Biopsy studies show that graft remodeling undergoes an early healing phase, a phase of remodeling or proliferation and a ligamentization phase as an ongoing process even 1 year after surgery. Imaging studies showed an initial increase in SNQ, peaking at approximately 6 months, followed by a gradual decrease over time. There is no evident correlation between graft SNQ and knee stability outcome scores at the short- and long-term follow-up after ACLR.

Conclusions: The remodeling of the graft is an ongoing process even 1 year after ACLR, based on human biopsy studies. MRI SNQ peaked at approximately 6 months, followed by a gradual decrease over time. Heterogeneity of the MRI methods and technical restrictions used in the current literature limit prediction of graft maturity and clinical and functional outcome measures by means of MRI graft SNQ after ACLR.

Level Of Evidence: Level IV, systematic review, including level III and IV studies.

Citing Articles

Can MRI predict return to sport after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction? A systematic review of the literature.

DAmbrosi R, Sconfienza L, Albano D, Meena A, Abermann E, Fink C Radiol Med. 2025; .

PMID: 40063165 DOI: 10.1007/s11547-025-01973-5.


Novel Noninvasive Imaging Techniques to Assess Structural, Functional, and Material Properties of Tendon, Ligament, and Cartilage: A Narrative Review of Current Concepts.

Retzky J, Koff M, Nwawka O, Rodeo S Orthop J Sports Med. 2025; 13(2):23259671251317223.

PMID: 39968411 PMC: 11833890. DOI: 10.1177/23259671251317223.


Adenosine, lidocaine, and magnesium therapy augments joint tissue healing following experimental anterior cruciate ligament rupture and reconstruction.

Morris J, Letson H, McEwen P, Dobson G Bone Joint Res. 2024; 13(6):279-293.

PMID: 38843878 PMC: 11156504. DOI: 10.1302/2046-3758.136.BJR-2023-0360.R1.


Association of Graft Maturity on MRI With Return to Sports at 9 Months After Primary Single-Bundle ACL Reconstruction With Autologous Hamstring Graft.

Zhou T, Xu Y, Zhang A, Zhang X, Deng K, Wu H Orthop J Sports Med. 2024; 12(5):23259671241248202.

PMID: 38736770 PMC: 11084992. DOI: 10.1177/23259671241248202.


A Review of Chronic Lateral Ankle Instability and Emerging Alternative Outcome Monitoring Tools in Patients following Ankle Ligament Reconstruction Surgery.

Saliba I, Hardy A, Wang W, Vialle R, Feruglio S J Clin Med. 2024; 13(2).

PMID: 38256576 PMC: 10816882. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13020442.


References
1.
Biercevicz A, Miranda D, Machan J, Murray M, Fleming B . In Situ, noninvasive, T2*-weighted MRI-derived parameters predict ex vivo structural properties of an anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction or bioenhanced primary repair in a porcine model. Am J Sports Med. 2013; 41(3):560-6. PMC: 3593999. DOI: 10.1177/0363546512472978. View

2.
Sanchez M, Anitua E, Azofra J, Prado R, Muruzabal F, Andia I . Ligamentization of tendon grafts treated with an endogenous preparation rich in growth factors: gross morphology and histology. Arthroscopy. 2010; 26(4):470-80. DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2009.08.019. View

3.
Biercevicz A, Akelman M, Fadale P, Hulstyn M, Shalvoy R, Badger G . MRI volume and signal intensity of ACL graft predict clinical, functional, and patient-oriented outcome measures after ACL reconstruction. Am J Sports Med. 2014; 43(3):693-9. PMC: 4344859. DOI: 10.1177/0363546514561435. View

4.
Ahn J, Lee S, Choi S, Lim T . Magnetic resonance imaging evaluation of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using quadrupled hamstring tendon autografts: comparison of remnant bundle preservation and standard technique. Am J Sports Med. 2010; 38(9):1768-77. DOI: 10.1177/0363546510368132. View

5.
Stockle U, Hoffmann R, Schwedke J, Lubrich J, Vogl T, Sudkamp N . Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: the diagnostic value of MRI. Int Orthop. 1999; 22(5):288-92. PMC: 3619572. DOI: 10.1007/s002640050262. View