» Articles » PMID: 32873326

Open-chest Versus Closed-chest Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation in Trauma Patients with Signs of Life Upon Hospital Arrival: a Retrospective Multicenter Study

Overview
Journal Crit Care
Specialty Critical Care
Date 2020 Sep 3
PMID 32873326
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The effectiveness and indications of open-chest cardiopulmonary resuscitation (OCCPR) have been still debatable. Although current guidelines state that the presence of signs of life (SOL) is an indication for OCCPR, scientific evidence corroborating this recommendation has been scarce. This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of OCCPR to closed-chest cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CCCPR) in severe trauma patients with SOL upon arrival at the emergency department (ED).

Methods: A retrospective cohort study analyzing data from the Trauma Quality Improvement Program (TQIP) database, a nationwide trauma registry in the USA, between 2010 and 2016 was conducted. Severe trauma patients who had SOL upon arrival at the hospital and received cardiopulmonary resuscitation within the first 6 h of ED admission were identified. Survival to hospital discharge was evaluated using logistic regression analysis, instrumental variable analysis, and propensity score matching analysis adjusting for potential confounders.

Results: A total of 2682 patients (OCCPR 1032; CCCPR 1650) were evaluated; of those 157 patients (15.2%) in the OCCPR group and 193 patients (11.7%) in the CCCPR group survived. OCCPR was significantly associated with higher survival to hospital discharge in both the logistic regression analysis (adjusted odds ratio [95% confidence interval] = 1.99 [1.42-2.79], p <  0.001) and the instrumental variable analysis (adjusted odds ratio [95% confidence interval] = 1.16 [1.02-1.31], p = 0.021). In the propensity score matching analysis, 531 matched pairs were generated, and the OCCPR group still showed significantly higher survival at hospital discharge (89 patients [16.8%] in the OCCPR group vs 58 patients [10.9%] in the CCCPR group; odds ratio [95% confidence interval] = 1.66 [1.13-2.42], p = 0.009).

Conclusions: Compared to CCCPR, OCCPR was associated with significantly higher survival at hospital discharge in severe trauma patients with SOL upon ED arrival. Further studies to confirm these results and to assess long-term neurologic outcomes are needed.

Citing Articles

Contemporary management of traumatic cardiac arrest and peri-arrest states: a narrative review.

Carenzo L, Calgaro G, Rehn M, Perkins Z, Qasim Z, Gamberini L J Anesth Analg Crit Care. 2024; 4(1):66.

PMID: 39327636 PMC: 11426104. DOI: 10.1186/s44158-024-00197-9.


Cardiac arrest in the perioperative period: a consensus guideline for identification, treatment, and prevention from the European Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care and the European Society for Trauma and Emergency Surgery.

Hinkelbein J, Andres J, Bottiger B, Brazzi L, De Robertis E, Einav S Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2023; 49(5):2031-2046.

PMID: 37430174 PMC: 10520188. DOI: 10.1007/s00068-023-02271-3.


Use of a disposable vascular pressure device to guide balloon inflation of resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta: a bench study.

Levis A, Egli N, Jenni H, Hautz W, Daley J, Haenggi M Sci Rep. 2021; 11(1):24055.

PMID: 34912008 PMC: 8674295. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-03502-6.


Association between emergency medical service transport time and survival in patients with traumatic cardiac arrest: a Nationwide retrospective observational study.

Naito H, Yumoto T, Yorifuji T, Nojima T, Yamamoto H, Yamada T BMC Emerg Med. 2021; 21(1):104.

PMID: 34530735 PMC: 8447624. DOI: 10.1186/s12873-021-00499-z.


[Cardiac arrest under special circumstances].

Lott C, Truhlar A, Alfonzo A, Barelli A, Gonzalez-Salvado V, Hinkelbein J Notf Rett Med. 2021; 24(4):447-523.

PMID: 34127910 PMC: 8190767. DOI: 10.1007/s10049-021-00891-z.


References
1.
Yamamoto R, Suzuki M, Nakama R, Kase K, Sekine K, Kurihara T . Impact of cardiopulmonary resuscitation time on the effectiveness of emergency department thoracotomy after blunt trauma. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2018; 45(4):697-704. DOI: 10.1007/s00068-018-0967-y. View

2.
Suzuki K, Inoue S, Morita S, Watanabe N, Shintani A, Inokuchi S . Comparative Effectiveness of Emergency Resuscitative Thoracotomy versus Closed Chest Compressions among Patients with Critical Blunt Trauma: A Nationwide Cohort Study in Japan. PLoS One. 2016; 11(1):e0145963. PMC: 4713157. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0145963. View

3.
Endo A, Shiraishi A, Otomo Y, Tomita M, Matsui H, Murata K . Open-chest versus closed-chest cardiopulmonary resuscitation in blunt trauma: analysis of a nationwide trauma registry. Crit Care. 2017; 21(1):169. PMC: 5496413. DOI: 10.1186/s13054-017-1759-1. View

4.
Rassen J, Schneeweiss S, Glynn R, Mittleman M, Brookhart M . Instrumental variable analysis for estimation of treatment effects with dichotomous outcomes. Am J Epidemiol. 2008; 169(3):273-84. DOI: 10.1093/aje/kwn299. View

5.
Nevins E, Bird N, Malik H, Mercer S, Shahzad K, Lunevicius R . A systematic review of 3251 emergency department thoracotomies: is it time for a national database?. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2018; 45(2):231-243. DOI: 10.1007/s00068-018-0982-z. View