» Articles » PMID: 32867972

Probiotic Bacillus Amyloliquefaciens H57 Ameliorates Subclinical Necrotic Enteritis in Broiler Chicks by Maintaining Intestinal Mucosal Integrity and Improving Feed Efficiency

Overview
Journal Poult Sci
Publisher Elsevier
Date 2020 Sep 2
PMID 32867972
Citations 13
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Subclinical necrotic enteritis (NE) was induced in broiler chicks using a high dose of Eimeria spp. vaccine in the drinking water on day 9, and Clostridium perfringens (Cp) culture mixed in the feed on days 14 and 15. The aim was to evaluate the effects of probiotic Bacillus amyloliquefaciens strain H57 (H57) in preventing NE in chicks. Day-old Ross 308, male broilers were weighed and randomly assigned to 6 treatment groups (6 replicate cages/treatment and 8 birds/cage). Birds in group 1 (control) were fed the basal wheat-soybean diet without H57 or NE infection; in group 2 (Eimeria) were treated with Eimeria alone; in group 3 (Cp) were treated with Cp alone; in group 4 (NE) received both Eimeria and Cp; in group 5 (NE-H57) received NE infection and H57; and group 6 (H57) received H57. The basal diet of chicks in groups 5 and 6 was supplemented with H57 at a density of 2 × 10 spores/g feed from 1 D of age. On day 21, there were no significant treatment effects on BW and feed intake between control and H57 birds. However, on day 21, the feed conversion ratio of NE-H57 birds was significantly improved when compared with NE birds (1.28 vs. 1.36; P < 0.001). Birds challenged with NE had a higher occurrence of pasty vent than birds infected with either Eimeria, Cp, or NE-H57 (41 vs. 27 vs. 29 vs. 19%, respectively; P < 0.001). Intestinal lesion scores of NE birds were also higher than those of Eimeria, Cp, and NE-H57 birds (5.67 vs. 2.56 vs. 2.78 vs. 2.10, respectively; P < 0.001) and correlated with pasty vent (Pearson's r = 0.56; P < 0.001). Microscopic evaluation showed mucosal damage and necrosis in NE birds. In contrast, villi from NE-H57 birds were normal, with no damage or infiltration with Eimeria or Cp. H57 appears to be effective in challenged birds, as it maintained epithelial barrier integrity and improved feed efficiency.

Citing Articles

Transformation of sugarcane molasses into fructooligosaccharides with enhanced prebiotic activity using whole-cell biocatalysts from Aureobasidium pullulans FRR 5284 and an invertase-deficient Saccharomyces cerevisiae 1403-7A.

Khatun M, Hassanpour M, Mussatto S, Harrison M, Speight R, OHara I Bioresour Bioprocess. 2024; 8(1):85.

PMID: 38650262 PMC: 10992603. DOI: 10.1186/s40643-021-00438-7.


Applications of Enteroendocrine Cells (EECs) Hormone: Applicability on Feed Intake and Nutrient Absorption in Chickens.

Lee J, Kim W Animals (Basel). 2023; 13(18).

PMID: 37760373 PMC: 10525316. DOI: 10.3390/ani13182975.


Effects of a novel, non-invasive pre-hatch application of probiotic for broilers on development of cecum microbiota and production performance.

Villumsen K, Sandvang D, Vestergard G, Olsen M, Juul J, Dencker M Anim Microbiome. 2023; 5(1):41.

PMID: 37670379 PMC: 10478294. DOI: 10.1186/s42523-023-00263-7.


Recent Trends on Mitigative Effect of Probiotics on Oxidative-Stress-Induced Gut Dysfunction in Broilers under Necrotic Enteritis Challenge: A Review.

Obianwuna U, Agbai Kalu N, Wang J, Zhang H, Qi G, Qiu K Antioxidants (Basel). 2023; 12(4).

PMID: 37107286 PMC: 10136232. DOI: 10.3390/antiox12040911.


Effects of Administration on Intestinal Morphometry and Antibody Serum Levels in -Infantis-Challenged Chickens.

Sefcova M, Ortega-Paredes D, Larrea-Alvarez C, Mina I, Guapas V, Ayala-Velastegui D Microorganisms. 2023; 11(2).

PMID: 36838221 PMC: 9963312. DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms11020256.


References
1.
Prescott J, Sivendra R, Barnum D . The use of bacitracin in the prevention and treatment of experimentally-induced necrotic enteritis in the chicken. Can Vet J. 1978; 19(7):181-3. PMC: 1789416. View

2.
Brown R, HOPPS H . Staining of bacteria in tissue sections: a reliable gram stain method. Am J Clin Pathol. 1973; 60(2):234-40. DOI: 10.1093/ajcp/60.2.234. View

3.
Rowland I, Gibson G, Heinken A, Scott K, Swann J, Thiele I . Gut microbiota functions: metabolism of nutrients and other food components. Eur J Nutr. 2017; 57(1):1-24. PMC: 5847071. DOI: 10.1007/s00394-017-1445-8. View

4.
Cengiz O, Koksal B, Tatli O, Sevim O, Ahsan U, Uner A . Effect of dietary probiotic and high stocking density on the performance, carcass yield, gut microflora, and stress indicators of broilers. Poult Sci. 2015; 94(10):2395-403. DOI: 10.3382/ps/pev194. View

5.
Salim H, Kang H, Akter N, Kim D, Kim J, Kim M . Supplementation of direct-fed microbials as an alternative to antibiotic on growth performance, immune response, cecal microbial population, and ileal morphology of broiler chickens. Poult Sci. 2013; 92(8):2084-90. DOI: 10.3382/ps.2012-02947. View