» Articles » PMID: 32866650

Dalbavancin Exposure In vitro Selects for Dalbavancin-non-susceptible and Vancomycin-intermediate Strains of Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus Aureus

Overview
Publisher Elsevier
Date 2020 Sep 1
PMID 32866650
Citations 21
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: Dalbavancin is a lipoglycopeptide active against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). Its long half-life (8.5-16 days) allows for once-weekly or single-dose treatments but could prolong the mutant selection window, promoting resistance and cross-resistance to related antimicrobials such as vancomycin. The objective of this study was to evaluate the capacity of post-distributional pharmacokinetic exposures of dalbavancin to select for resistance and cross-resistance in MRSA.

Methods: We simulated average, post-distributional exposures of single-dose (1500 mg) dalbavancin (fCmax 9.9 μg/mL, β-elimination t 204 h) in an in vitro pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) model for 28 days (672 h) against five MRSA strains and one methicillin-susceptible strain (MSSA). Samples were collected at least daily, and surviving colonies were enumerated and screened for resistance on drug-free and dalbavancin-supplemented medium respectively. Isolates from resistance screening plates were subjected to whole-genome sequencing (WGS) and susceptibly testing against dalbavancin, vancomycin, daptomycin, and six β-lactams with varying penicillin-binding protein (PBP) affinities.

Results: Dalbavancin was bactericidal against most strains for days 1-4 before regrowth of less susceptible subpopulations occurred. Isolates with eight-fold increases in dalbavancin MIC were detected as early as day 4 but increased 64-128-fold in all models by day 28. Vancomycin and daptomycin MICs increased 4-16-fold, exceeding the susceptibly breakpoints for both antibiotics; β-lactam MICs generally decreased by two-to eight-fold, suggesting a dalbavancin-β-lactam seesaw effect, but increased by eight-fold or more in certain isolates. Resistant isolates carried mutations in a variety of genes, most commonly walKR, apt, stp1, and atl.

Conclusions: In our in vitro system, post-distributional dalbavancin exposures selected for stable mutants with reduced susceptibility to dalbavancin, vancomycin, and daptomycin, and generally increased susceptibility to β-lactams in all strains of MRSA tested. The clinical significance of these findings remains unclear, but created an opportunity to genotype a unique collection of dalbavancin-resistant strains for the first time. Mutations involved genes previously associated with vancomycin intermediate susceptibility and daptomycin non-susceptibility, most commonly walKR-associated genes.

Citing Articles

ESKAPE pathogens rapidly develop resistance against antibiotics in development in vitro.

Daruka L, Czikkely M, Szili P, Farkas Z, Balogh D, Grezal G Nat Microbiol. 2025; 10(2):313-331.

PMID: 39805953 PMC: 11790497. DOI: 10.1038/s41564-024-01891-8.


Dalbavancin-resistant selection following a prosthetic joint infection: phenotypic and genomic characterization.

Ruffier dEpenoux L, Barbier P, Fayoux E, Guillouzouic A, Lecomte R, Deschanvres C JAC Antimicrob Resist. 2024; 6(5):dlae163.

PMID: 39429235 PMC: 11487905. DOI: 10.1093/jacamr/dlae163.


Unraveling novel mutation patterns and morphological variations in two dalbavancin-resistant MRSA strains in Austria using whole genome sequencing and transmission electron microscopy.

Hotz J, Staudacher M, Schefberger K, Spettel K, Schmid K, Kriz R BMC Infect Dis. 2024; 24(1):899.

PMID: 39223565 PMC: 11367932. DOI: 10.1186/s12879-024-09797-w.


Genome-wide CRISPRi screens for high-throughput fitness quantification and identification of determinants for dalbavancin susceptibility in .

Liu X, de Bakker V, Heggenhougen M, Marli M, Froynes A, Salehian Z mSystems. 2024; 9(7):e0128923.

PMID: 38837392 PMC: 11265419. DOI: 10.1128/msystems.01289-23.


Antibiotic Resistance to Molecules Commonly Prescribed for the Treatment of Antibiotic-Resistant Gram-Positive Pathogens: What Is Relevant for the Clinician?.

Tebano G, Zaghi I, Baldasso F, Calgarini C, Capozzi R, Salvadori C Pathogens. 2024; 13(1).

PMID: 38276161 PMC: 10819222. DOI: 10.3390/pathogens13010088.


References
1.
Jackman S, Vandervalk B, Mohamadi H, Chu J, Yeo S, Hammond S . ABySS 2.0: resource-efficient assembly of large genomes using a Bloom filter. Genome Res. 2017; 27(5):768-777. PMC: 5411771. DOI: 10.1101/gr.214346.116. View

2.
Howden B, Davies J, Johnson P, Stinear T, Grayson M . Reduced vancomycin susceptibility in Staphylococcus aureus, including vancomycin-intermediate and heterogeneous vancomycin-intermediate strains: resistance mechanisms, laboratory detection, and clinical implications. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2010; 23(1):99-139. PMC: 2806658. DOI: 10.1128/CMR.00042-09. View

3.
Werth B, Sakoulas G, Rose W, Pogliano J, Tewhey R, Rybak M . Ceftaroline increases membrane binding and enhances the activity of daptomycin against daptomycin-nonsusceptible vancomycin-intermediate Staphylococcus aureus in a pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic model. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2012; 57(1):66-73. PMC: 3535972. DOI: 10.1128/AAC.01586-12. View

4.
Roach D, Burton J, Lee C, Stackhouse B, Butler-Wu S, Cookson B . A Year of Infection in the Intensive Care Unit: Prospective Whole Genome Sequencing of Bacterial Clinical Isolates Reveals Cryptic Transmissions and Novel Microbiota. PLoS Genet. 2015; 11(7):e1005413. PMC: 4521703. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1005413. View

5.
Werth B, Steed M, Ireland C, Tran T, Nonejuie P, Murray B . Defining daptomycin resistance prevention exposures in vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium and E. faecalis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2014; 58(9):5253-61. PMC: 4135850. DOI: 10.1128/AAC.00098-14. View