» Articles » PMID: 32861678

Trends in First-time Hospitalization, Management, and Short-term Mortality in Acute Myocardial Infarction-related Cardiogenic Shock from 2005 to 2017: A Nationwide Cohort Study

Overview
Journal Am Heart J
Date 2020 Aug 31
PMID 32861678
Citations 14
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Cardiogenic shock remains the leading cause of in-hospital death in acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Because of temporary changes in management of cardiogenic shock with widespread implementation of early revascularization along with increasing attention to the use of mechanical circulatory devices, complete and longitudinal data are important in this subject. The objective of this study was to examine temporal trends of first-time hospitalization, management, and short-term mortality for patients with AMI-related cardiogenic shock (AMICS).

Methods: Using nationwide medical registries, we identified patients hospitalized with first-time AMI and cardiogenic shock from January 1, 2005, through December 31, 2017. We calculated annual incidence proportions of AMICS. Thirty-day mortality was estimated with use of Kaplan-Meier estimator comparing AMICS and AMI-only patients. Multivariable Cox regression models were used to assess mortality rate ratios.

Results: We included 101,834 AMI patients of whom 7,040 (7%) had AMICS. The median age was 72 (interquartile range: 62-80) for AMICS and 69 (interquartile range: 58-79) for AMI-only patients. The gender composition was similar between AMICS and AMI-only patients (male: 64% vs 63%). The annual incidence proportion of AMICS decreased slightly over time (2005: 7.0% vs 2017: 6.1%, P for trend < .0001). In AMICS, use of coronary angiography increased between 2005 and 2017 from 48% to 71%, as did use of left ventricular assist device (1% vs 10%) and norepinephrine (30% to 70%). In contrast, use of intra-aortic balloon pump (14% vs 1%) and dopamine (34% vs 20%) decreased. Thirty-day mortality for AMICS patients was 60% (95% CI: 59-61) and substantially higher than the 8% (95% CI: 7.8-8.2) for AMI-only patients (mortality rate ratio: 11.4, 95% CI: 10.9-11.8). Over time, the mortality decreased after AMICS (2005: 68% to 2017: 57%, P for temporal change in adjusted analysis < .0001).

Conclusions: We observed a slight decrease in AMICS hospitalization over time with changing practice patterns. Thirty-day mortality was markedly higher for patients with AMICS compared with AMI only, yet our results suggest improved 30-day survival over time after AMICS.

Citing Articles

Comprehensive analysis of the impact of primary percutaneous coronary intervention on patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.

Bangolo A, Wadhwani N World J Exp Med. 2024; 14(4):94845.

PMID: 39713076 PMC: 11551710. DOI: 10.5493/wjem.v14.i4.94845.


Ventilation strategies in cardiogenic shock: Insights from the AltShock-2 registry.

Sacco A, Montisci A, Tavecchia G, Frea S, Bernasconi D, Colombo C Eur J Heart Fail. 2024; 26(11):2412-2420.

PMID: 39105476 PMC: 11659490. DOI: 10.1002/ejhf.3409.


Outcomes of Impella 5.0 and 5.5 for cardiogenic shock: A single-center 137 patient experience.

Hong Y, Agrawal N, Hess N, Ziegler L, Sicke M, Hickey G Artif Organs. 2024; 48(7):771-780.

PMID: 38400638 PMC: 11411461. DOI: 10.1111/aor.14735.


Complications and Outcomes in 39,864 Patients Receiving Standard Care Plus Mechanical Circulatory Support or Standard Care Alone for Infarct-Associated Cardiogenic Shock.

Padberg J, Feld J, Padberg L, Koppe J, Makowski L, Gerss J J Clin Med. 2024; 13(4).

PMID: 38398478 PMC: 10889198. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13041167.


Changing Trends in Mechanical Circulatory Support Use and Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Interventions for Acute Coronary Syndrome Complicated With Cardiogenic Shock: Insights From a Nationwide Registry in Japan.

Nishimoto Y, Inohara T, Kohsaka S, Sakakura K, Kawai T, Kikuchi A J Am Heart Assoc. 2023; 12(23):e031838.

PMID: 38038195 PMC: 10727314. DOI: 10.1161/JAHA.123.031838.