» Articles » PMID: 32856003

Towards Estimating the Uncertainty Associated with Three-Dimensional Geometry Reconstructed from Medical Image Data

Overview
Date 2020 Aug 29
PMID 32856003
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Patient-specific computational modeling is increasingly used to assist with visualization, planning, and execution of medical treatments. This trend is placing more reliance on medical imaging to provide accurate representations of anatomical structures. Digital image analysis is used to extract anatomical data for use in clinical assessment/planning. However, the presence of image artifacts, whether due to interactions between the physical object and the scanning modality or the scanning process, can degrade image accuracy. The process of extracting anatomical structures from the medical images introduces additional sources of variability, e.g., when thresholding or when eroding along apparent edges of biological structures. An estimate of the uncertainty associated with extracting anatomical data from medical images would therefore assist with assessing the reliability of patient-specific treatment plans. To this end, two image datasets were developed and analyzed using standard image analysis procedures. The first dataset was developed by performing a "virtual voxelization" of a CAD model of a sphere, representing the idealized scenario of no error in the image acquisition and reconstruction algorithms (i.e., a perfect scan). The second dataset was acquired by scanning three spherical balls using a laboratory-grade CT scanner. For the idealized sphere, the error in sphere diameter was less than or equal to 2% if 5 or more voxels were present across the diameter. The measurement error degraded to approximately 4% for a similar degree of voxelization of the physical phantom. The adaptation of established thresholding procedures to improve segmentation accuracy was also investigated.

Citing Articles

Metallic Artifacts' Reduction in Microtomography Using the Bone- and Soft-Tissue Decomposition Method.

Juszczyk J, Palachniak J, Pietka E Sensors (Basel). 2024; 24(22).

PMID: 39598886 PMC: 11598100. DOI: 10.3390/s24227108.


Acquisition-invariant brain MRI segmentation with informative uncertainties.

Borges P, Shaw R, Varsavsky T, Klaser K, Thomas D, Drobnjak I Med Image Anal. 2023; 92:103058.

PMID: 38104403 PMC: 7617170. DOI: 10.1016/j.media.2023.103058.


Qualitative and Quantitative Assessments of Blood Flow on Tears in Type B Aortic Dissection With Different Morphologies.

Saitta S, Guo B, Pirola S, Menichini C, Guo D, Shan Y Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2021; 9:742985.

PMID: 34692660 PMC: 8531216. DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2021.742985.

References
1.
Gavrielides M, Li Q, Zeng R, Myers K, Sahiner B, Petrick N . Minimum detectable change in lung nodule volume in a phantom CT study. Acad Radiol. 2013; 20(11):1364-70. DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2013.08.019. View

2.
Goodman L, Gulsun M, Washington L, Nagy P, Piacsek K . Inherent variability of CT lung nodule measurements in vivo using semiautomated volumetric measurements. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2006; 186(4):989-94. DOI: 10.2214/AJR.04.1821. View

3.
Moyle K, Antiga L, Steinman D . Inlet conditions for image-based CFD models of the carotid bifurcation: is it reasonable to assume fully developed flow?. J Biomech Eng. 2006; 128(3):371-9. DOI: 10.1115/1.2187035. View

4.
Levine Z, Grantham S, Sawyer 4th D, Reeves A, Yankelevitz D . A Low-Cost Fiducial Reference Phantom for Computed Tomography. J Res Natl Inst Stand Technol. 2016; 113(6):335-40. PMC: 4652866. DOI: 10.6028/jres.113.027. View

5.
Li Q, Gavrielides M, Zeng R, Myers K, Sahiner B, Petrick N . Volume estimation of low-contrast lesions with CT: a comparison of performances from a phantom study, simulations and theoretical analysis. Phys Med Biol. 2015; 60(2):671-88. PMC: 5567810. DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/60/2/671. View