» Articles » PMID: 32855678

Advantages of 16S RRNA PCR for the Diagnosis of Prosthetic Joint Infection

Overview
Journal Exp Ther Med
Specialty Pathology
Date 2020 Aug 29
PMID 32855678
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

16S ribosomal RNA (rRNA) PCR has been reported to be an effective diagnostic means in patients with prosthetic joint infection (PJI). The aim of the present meta-analysis is to establish the overall diagnostic accuracy of the measurement of 16S rRNA PCR for diagnosing PJI. PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, EMBASE and Wiley Online Library were searched for studies on 16S rRNA PCR in the diagnosis of PJI. The search incorporated all literature published up until December 2018 and the QUADAS-2 checklist were used for quality assessment. The sensitivity, specificity and other measures of accuracy of 16S rRNA PCR in the diagnosis of PJI were pooled. Statistical analysis was performed by employing Meta-Disc 1.4 and Stata 12.0 software. A total of 15 studies met the inclusion criteria. The summary estimates for 16S rRNA PCR in the diagnosis of PJI in these studies were pooled: Sensitivity, 0.70 (95% CI, 0.67-0.73); specificity, 0.93 (95% CI, 0.91-0.94); positive likelihood ratio, 10.93 (95% CI, 5.55-21.51); negative likelihood ratio, 0.33 (95% CI, 0.28-0.40); diagnostic odds ratio, 41.77 (95% CI, 19.90-87.68); and the area under the curve, 0.89. Subgroup analysis showed that the use of sonicate fluid and periprosthetic tissue has higher sensitivity (0.76; 95% CI, 0.69-0.82; and 0.73; 95% CI, 0.68-0.78, respectively), specificity (0.93, 95% CI, 0.90-0.96; and 0.95; 95% CI, 0.90-0.98, respectively) and area under the curve (0.93 and 0.98, respectively). 16S rRNA PCR assay plays an important role in the diagnosis of PJI. The results of 16S rRNA PCR assays should be interpreted in parallel with clinical findings, the results of microbiological, and other laboratory tests.

Citing Articles

Diagnosis and Treatment of Acute Periprosthetic Infections with the BioFire System within a Time-Dependent and Bacterium-Dependent Protocol: Review and Prosthesis-Saving Protocol.

Sangaletti R, Andriollo L, Montagna A, Franzoni S, Colombini P, Perticarini L Biomedicines. 2024; 12(9).

PMID: 39335595 PMC: 11428812. DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines12092082.


Development of Diagnostic Quality Metrics for Prosthetic Joint Infection.

Miller A, Carli A, Chin A, Chee D, Simon S, Maclean C J Healthc Qual. 2024; 46(1):31-39.

PMID: 38166164 PMC: 10802978. DOI: 10.1097/JHQ.0000000000000405.


Surveillance of osteoarticular infections caused by in a paediatric hospital in Mexico City.

Aguilar-Gomez N, Merida-Vieyra J, Isunza-Alonso O, Morales-Pirela M, Colin-Martinez O, Juarez-Benitez E Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2022; 12:999268.

PMID: 36569208 PMC: 9774039. DOI: 10.3389/fcimb.2022.999268.


Detecting and Monitoring Periprosthetic Joint Infection by Using Electrical Bioimpedance Spectroscopy: A Preliminary Case Study.

Balato M, Petrarca C, Arpaia P, Moccaldi N, Mancino F, Carleo G Diagnostics (Basel). 2022; 12(7).

PMID: 35885583 PMC: 9323083. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics12071680.

References
1.
Berbari E, Hanssen A, Duffy M, Steckelberg J, Ilstrup D, Harmsen W . Risk factors for prosthetic joint infection: case-control study. Clin Infect Dis. 1998; 27(5):1247-54. DOI: 10.1086/514991. View

2.
Van Manen M, Nace J, Mont M . Management of primary knee osteoarthritis and indications for total knee arthroplasty for general practitioners. J Am Osteopath Assoc. 2012; 112(11):709-15. View

3.
Peel T, Buising K, Choong P . Diagnosis and management of prosthetic joint infection. Curr Opin Infect Dis. 2012; 25(6):670-6. DOI: 10.1097/QCO.0b013e32835915db. View

4.
Gomez E, Cazanave C, Cunningham S, Greenwood-Quaintance K, Steckelberg J, Uhl J . Prosthetic joint infection diagnosis using broad-range PCR of biofilms dislodged from knee and hip arthroplasty surfaces using sonication. J Clin Microbiol. 2012; 50(11):3501-8. PMC: 3486250. DOI: 10.1128/JCM.00834-12. View

5.
Clohisy J, Calvert G, Tull F, McDonald D, Maloney W . Reasons for revision hip surgery: a retrospective review. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004; (429):188-92. DOI: 10.1097/01.blo.0000150126.73024.42. View