» Articles » PMID: 32854838

Angiotensin Receptor-Neprilysin Inhibition Based on History of Heart Failure and Use of Renin-Angiotensin System Antagonists

Overview
Date 2020 Aug 29
PMID 32854838
Citations 21
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The PIONEER-HF (comParIson Of sacubitril/valsartaN versus Enalapril on Effect on nt-pRo-bnp in patients stabilized from an acute Heart Failure episode) trial demonstrated the efficacy and safety of sacubitril/valsartan (S/V) in stabilized patients with acute decompensated heart failure (HF) and reduced ejection fraction.

Objectives: The study sought to determine whether and how prior HF history and treatment with an angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor or angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB) affected the results.

Methods: The PIONEER-HF trial was a prospective, multicenter, double-blind, randomized clinical trial enrolling 881 patients with an ejection fraction ≤40%. Patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to in-hospital initiation of S/V (n = 440) versus enalapril (n = 441). Pre-specified subgroup analyses were performed based on prior HF history (i.e., de novo HF vs. worsening chronic HF) and treatment with an ACE inhibitor or ARB (i.e., ACE inhibitor or ARB-yes vs. ACE inhibitor or ARB-no) at admission.

Results: At enrollment, 303 (34%) patients presented with de novo HF and 576 (66%) patients with worsening chronic HF. A total of 421 (48%) patients had been treated with an ACE inhibitor or ARB, while 458 (52%) had not been treated with an ACE inhibitor or ARB. N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide declined significantly in all 4 subgroups (p < 0.001), with greater decreases in the S/V versus the enalapril arm (p < 0.001). There was no interaction between prior HF history (p = 0.350) or ACE inhibitor or ARB treatment (p = 0.880) and the effect of S/V versus enalapril on cardiovascular death or rehospitalization for HF. The incidences of adverse events were comparable between S/V and enalapril across all 4 subgroups.

Conclusions: Among patients admitted for acute decompensated HF, S/V was safe and well tolerated, led to a significantly greater reduction in N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide, and improved clinical outcomes compared with enalapril irrespective of previous HF history or ACE inhibitor or ARB treatment. (Comparison of Sacubitril/Valsartan Versus Enalapril on Effect of NT-proBNP in Patients Stabilized From an Acute Heart Failure Episode [PIONEER-HF]; NCT02554890).

Citing Articles

Sacubitril/Valsartan for Blood Pressure Lowering in Non-Dialysis-Dependent Chronic Kidney Disease Stage 3-5 Patients With Hypertension: A Multicenter Clinical Study.

Yan Y, Li X, Cao J, Cao J, Wang Y, Wang L J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2025; 27(1):e14969.

PMID: 39826131 PMC: 11771808. DOI: 10.1111/jch.14969.


Looking for the ideal medication for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: a narrative review.

Pascual-Figal D, Bayes-Genis A Front Cardiovasc Med. 2024; 11:1439696.

PMID: 39314771 PMC: 11417622. DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2024.1439696.


Effects of Sacubitril/Valsartan vs Valsartan in De Novo vs Acute on Chronic HFpEF and HFmrEF.

Murray E, Cyr D, Fudim M, Ward J, Hernandez A, Lepage S JACC Adv. 2024; 3(6):100984.

PMID: 38938861 PMC: 11198033. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacadv.2024.100984.


Effects of Angiotensin Receptor-Neprilysin Inhibitors Versus Enalapril or Valsartan on Patients With Heart Failure: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Jain A, Meyur S, Wadhwa L, Singh K, Sharma R, Panchal I Cureus. 2023; 15(7):e41566.

PMID: 37554618 PMC: 10405977. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.41566.


Efficacy and safety analysis of angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibition(ARNI)in patients with heart failure: a real-world retrospective study.

Wang X, Pu J, Wang G, Xu H, Liu L, Li Z BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2023; 23(1):343.

PMID: 37430227 PMC: 10334639. DOI: 10.1186/s12872-023-03374-w.