» Articles » PMID: 32853703

Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Randomized Clinical Trial of Neurofeedback for Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder With 13-Month Follow-up

Overview
Publisher Elsevier
Specialties Pediatrics
Psychiatry
Date 2020 Aug 28
PMID 32853703
Citations 26
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To determine whether theta/beta-ratio (TBR) electroencephalographic biofeedback (neurofeedback [NF]) has a specific effect on attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) beyond nonspecific benefit.

Method: In a 2-site double-blind randomized clinical trial, 144 children aged 7 to 10 years with rigorously diagnosed moderate/severe ADHD and theta/beta-ratio (TBR) ≥4.5 were randomized 3:2 to deliberate TBR downtraining versus a control of equal duration, intensity, and appearance. Two early dropouts left 142 children for modified intent-to-treat analysis. The control used prerecorded electroencephalograms with the participant's artifacts superimposed. Treatment was programmed via Internet by an off-site statistician-guided co-investigator. Fidelity was 98.7% by trainers/therapists and 93.2% by NF expert monitor. The primary outcome was parent- and teacher-rated inattention; analysis was mixed-effects regression. Because the expense and effort of NF can be justified only by enduring benefit, follow-ups were integrated.

Results: Blinding was excellent. Although both groups showed significant improvement (p < .001, d = 1.5) in parent/teacher-rated inattention from baseline to treatment end and 13-month follow-up, NF was not significantly superior to the control condition at either time point on this primary outcome (d = 0.01, p = .965 at treatment end; d = 0.23, p = .412 at 13-month follow-up). Responders (Clinical Global Impression-Improvement [CGI-I] = 1-2) were 61% of NF and 54% of controls (p = .36). Adverse events were distributed proportionally between treatments. The 13-month follow-up found nonsignificant improvement from treatment end for NF (d = 0.1), with mild deterioration for controls (d = -0.07). NF required significantly less medication at follow-up (p = .012).

Conclusion: This study does not support a specific effect of deliberate TBR NF at either treatment end or 13-month follow-up. Participants will be reassessed at 25-month follow-up.

Clinical Trial Registration Information: Double-Blind 2-Site Randomized Clinical Trial of Neurofeedback for ADHD; https://clinicaltrials.gov/; NCT02251743.

Citing Articles

Efficacy of behavior modification training combined with electroencephalographic biofeedback therapy for attention deficit hyperactivity disorder in children: a randomized controlled trial.

Luo X, Zhang L, Xia L, Zhou X Front Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2025; 2():1235310.

PMID: 39816856 PMC: 11731661. DOI: 10.3389/frcha.2023.1235310.


Comparative Efficacy of Neurofeedback Interventions for Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder in Children: A Network Meta-Analysis.

Wu G, He Q, Li D, Zhang Z, Miao J, Shu Y Brain Behav. 2024; 14(12):e70194.

PMID: 39711044 PMC: 11664034. DOI: 10.1002/brb3.70194.


Neurofeedback for Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Westwood S, Aggensteiner P, Kaiser A, Nagy P, Donno F, Merkl D JAMA Psychiatry. 2024; 82(2):118-129.

PMID: 39661381 PMC: 11800020. DOI: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2024.3702.


Neurodevelopmental Disorders: Role of Non-invasive Neuromodulation Therapies.

Prasad B, Patil V, Sony K Ann Neurosci. 2024; 31(2):77-79.

PMID: 38694712 PMC: 11060127. DOI: 10.1177/09727531241245664.


Limited usefulness of neurocognitive functioning indices as predictive markers for treatment response to methylphenidate or neurofeedback@home in children and adolescents with ADHD.

Kaiser A, Aggensteiner P, Blasco Fontecilla H, Ros T, Acquaviva E, Attal Y Front Psychiatry. 2024; 14:1331004.

PMID: 38312916 PMC: 10836215. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1331004.


References
1.
Gelade K, Janssen T, Bink M, van Mourik R, Maras A, Oosterlaan J . Behavioral Effects of Neurofeedback Compared to Stimulants and Physical Activity in Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder: A Randomized Controlled Trial. J Clin Psychiatry. 2016; 77(10):e1270-e1277. DOI: 10.4088/JCP.15m10149. View

2.
Swanson J, Kraemer H, Hinshaw S, Arnold L, Conners C, Abikoff H . Clinical relevance of the primary findings of the MTA: success rates based on severity of ADHD and ODD symptoms at the end of treatment. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2001; 40(2):168-79. DOI: 10.1097/00004583-200102000-00011. View

3.
Molina B, Hinshaw S, Swanson J, Eugene Arnold L, Vitiello B, Jensen P . The MTA at 8 years: prospective follow-up of children treated for combined-type ADHD in a multisite study. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2009; 48(5):484-500. PMC: 3063150. DOI: 10.1097/CHI.0b013e31819c23d0. View

4.
Monastra V, Lubar J, Linden M, VanDeusen P, Green G, Wing W . Assessing attention deficit hyperactivity disorder via quantitative electroencephalography: an initial validation study. Neuropsychology. 1999; 13(3):424-433. DOI: 10.1037/0894-4105.13.3.424. View

5.
Arns M, Heinrich H, Strehl U . Evaluation of neurofeedback in ADHD: the long and winding road. Biol Psychol. 2013; 95:108-15. DOI: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2013.11.013. View