» Articles » PMID: 32853122

Electronic Patient Reporting of Adverse Events and Quality of Life: A Prospective Feasibility Study in General Oncology

Overview
Journal JCO Oncol Pract
Specialty Oncology
Date 2020 Aug 28
PMID 32853122
Citations 11
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: Adverse event (AE) reporting is essential in clinical trials. Clinician interpretation can result in under-reporting; therefore, the value of patient self-reporting has been recognized. The National Cancer Institute has developed a Patient-Reported Outcomes version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE) for direct patient AE reporting. A nonrandomized prospective cohort feasibility study aimed to explore the compliance and acceptability of an electronic (Internet or telephone) system for collecting patient self-reported AEs and quality of life (QOL).

Methods: Oncology patients undergoing treatment (chemotherapy, targeted agents, hormone therapy, radiotherapy, and/or surgery) at 2 hospitals were sent automated weekly reminders to complete PRO-CTCAE once a week and QOL (for a maximum of 12 weeks). Patients had to speak/understand English and have access to the Internet or a touch-tone telephone. Primary outcome was compliance (proportion of expected questionnaires), and recruitment rate, attrition, and patient/staff feedback were also explored.

Results: Of 520 patients, 249 consented (47.9%)-mean age was 62 years, 51% were male, and 70% were married-and 230 remained on the study at week 12. PRO-CTCAE was completed at 2,301 (74.9%) of 3,074 timepoints and QOL at 749 (79.1%) of 947 timepoints. Individual weekly/once every 4 weeks compliance reduced over time but was more than 60% throughout. Of 230 patients, 106 (46.1%) completed 13 or more PRO-CTCAE, and 136 (59.1%) of 230 patients completed 4 QOL questionnaires. Most were completed on the Internet (82.3%; mean age, 60.8 years), which was quicker, but older patients preferred the telephone option (mean age, 70.0 years). Positive feedback was received from patients and staff.

Conclusion: Self-reporting of AEs and QOL using an electronic home-based system is feasible and acceptable. Implementation of this approach in cancer clinical trials may improve the precision and accuracy of AE reporting.

Citing Articles

Active symptom monitoring for premenopausal women with breast cancer initiating adjuvant endocrine therapy: Protocol for the SWOG S2010 randomized controlled efficacy trial.

Henry N, Unger J, Vaidya R, Darke A, Skaar T, Fisch M Contemp Clin Trials. 2024; 147:107712.

PMID: 39395534 PMC: 11620912. DOI: 10.1016/j.cct.2024.107712.


Unleashing patient voices: empowering adverse event assessment with complete patient-reported outcomes.

Phung T, Bradford N, Pitt E, Alexander K Oncologist. 2024; 29(7):e953-e956.

PMID: 38785396 PMC: 11224975. DOI: 10.1093/oncolo/oyae105.


Remote Patient-Reported Outcomes and Activity Monitoring to Improve Patient-Clinician Communication Regarding Symptoms and Functional Status: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Parikh R, Schriver E, Ferrell W, Wakim J, Williamson J, Khan N JCO Oncol Pract. 2023; 19(12):1143-1151.

PMID: 37816198 PMC: 10732505. DOI: 10.1200/OP.23.00048.


Safety culture and adverse event reporting in Ghanaian healthcare facilities: Implications for patient safety.

Abuosi A, Poku C, Attafuah P, Anaba E, Abor P, Setordji A PLoS One. 2022; 17(10):e0275606.

PMID: 36260634 PMC: 9581362. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0275606.


Effectiveness of a phone-based nurse monitoring assessment and intervention for chemotherapy-related toxicity: A randomized multicenter trial.

Antonuzzo A, Ripamonti C, Roila F, Sbrana A, Galli L, Miccinesi G Front Oncol. 2022; 12:925366.

PMID: 36185306 PMC: 9520968. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.925366.


References
1.
Basch E, Reeve B, Mitchell S, Clauser S, Minasian L, Dueck A . Development of the National Cancer Institute's patient-reported outcomes version of the common terminology criteria for adverse events (PRO-CTCAE). J Natl Cancer Inst. 2014; 106(9). PMC: 4200059. DOI: 10.1093/jnci/dju244. View

2.
VanGeest J, Johnson T . Using incentives in surveys of cancer patients: do "best practices" apply?. Cancer Causes Control. 2012; 23(12):2047-52. DOI: 10.1007/s10552-012-0082-z. View

3.
Basch E, Jia X, Heller G, Barz A, Sit L, Fruscione M . Adverse symptom event reporting by patients vs clinicians: relationships with clinical outcomes. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2009; 101(23):1624-32. PMC: 2786917. DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djp386. View

4.
Aaronson N, Ahmedzai S, Bergman B, Bullinger M, Cull A, Duez N . The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30: a quality-of-life instrument for use in international clinical trials in oncology. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1993; 85(5):365-76. DOI: 10.1093/jnci/85.5.365. View

5.
Denis F, Lethrosne C, Pourel N, Molinier O, Pointreau Y, Domont J . Randomized Trial Comparing a Web-Mediated Follow-up With Routine Surveillance in Lung Cancer Patients. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2017; 109(9). DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djx029. View