» Articles » PMID: 32851987

Immediate Post-extraction Implants Placed in Acute Periapical Infected Sites with Immediate Prosthetic Provisionalization: a 1-year Prospective Cohort Study

Overview
Specialty Dentistry
Date 2020 Aug 28
PMID 32851987
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Few studies have reported the outcomes of immediate placement at infected post-extraction sites. The aim of this study was to compare clinical and radiological outcomes of immediately placed implants with immediate prosthetic provisionalization in sockets with or without acute periapical pathology.

Material And Methods: A total of 100 patients with immediately placed implants with immediate provisionalization and 1- year of follow up were included (50 patients with acute periapical pathology and a control group of 50 patients without acute periapical pathology). Clinical parameters (bleeding on probing, buccal keratinized mucosa width, clinical recession, and probing depth) and radiological parameters (distance from implant shoulder to first point of bone-to-implant contact [IS-BIC]) were assessed.

Results: Clinical parameters showed no significant differences between the study and control groups after 1-year follow up (p>0.05). IS-BIC presented the following values: 0.35 ± 0.51 mm (study group) and 0.15 ± 0.87 mm (control), without significant differences between the groups (p=0.160). None of the 50 radiographs of immediate implants placed in sockets with periapical pathology revealed retrograde peri-implantitis.

Conclusions: Immediate placement of implants with immediate prosthetic provisionalization at sites with acute periapical pathology can be a successful treatment modality for at least 1-year.

Citing Articles

Five- and 18-Year Outcome of Two Cases with Full-Arch Rehabilitations Ad modum All-on-4 in the Presence of Challenging Conditions.

de Araujo Nobre M, Santos D, Ferro A, Lopes A, Antunes C, Vitor I Eur J Dent. 2024; 18(4):1179-1186.

PMID: 39043210 PMC: 11479728. DOI: 10.1055/s-0044-1787961.


Comparison of Immediate Implantation into the Socket with and without Periapical Pathology: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Pranckeviciene A, Vaitkeviciene I, Siudikiene J, Poskeviciene S, Maciulskiene-Visockiene V Medicina (Kaunas). 2024; 60(6).

PMID: 38929509 PMC: 11206124. DOI: 10.3390/medicina60060893.


Placement of immediate dental implants in extraction sockets exhibiting the apical pathosis. A meta-analysis.

Mohammed AlMugeiren O, Assari A, Abdullah Alshehri K, Abdulaziz Alsharidah M, Alotaibi A, Hamad Alzaid A J Oral Biol Craniofac Res. 2024; 14(3):290-300.

PMID: 38601261 PMC: 11005000. DOI: 10.1016/j.jobcr.2024.03.008.

References
1.
Berglundh T, Lindhe J . Dimension of the periimplant mucosa. Biological width revisited. J Clin Periodontol. 1996; 23(10):971-3. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-051x.1996.tb00520.x. View

2.
Novaes Jr A, Vidigal Junior G, Novaes A, Grisi M, Polloni S, Rosa A . Immediate implants placed into infected sites: a histomorphometric study in dogs. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1998; 13(3):422-7. View

3.
Linkevicius T, Puisys A, Steigmann M, Vindasiute E, Linkeviciene L . Influence of Vertical Soft Tissue Thickness on Crestal Bone Changes Around Implants with Platform Switching: A Comparative Clinical Study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2014; 17(6):1228-36. DOI: 10.1111/cid.12222. View

4.
Quirynen M, Van Assche N, Botticelli D, Berglundh T . How does the timing of implant placement to extraction affect outcome?. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2008; 22 Suppl:203-23. View

5.
Waasdorp J, Evian C, Mandracchia M . Immediate placement of implants into infected sites: a systematic review of the literature. J Periodontol. 2010; 81(6):801-8. DOI: 10.1902/jop.2010.090706. View