» Articles » PMID: 32850215

Reducing the Risk of Postoperative Problems With Panniculectomies Using the Prevena Plus™ 125 Incisional Management Dressing

Overview
Journal Cureus
Date 2020 Aug 28
PMID 32850215
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Abdominal wall reconstruction procedures have become increasingly popular in recent years as technology and surgical techniques have improved. The downside to these procedures has been the high rate of postoperative complications. Surgical site infections have been reported as high as 33.7% of the $9.8 billion spent annually on these complications. I present the case of a 62-year-old morbidly obese woman who underwent a combined procedure of abdominal wall reconstruction and panniculectomy. A total of 45 lbs of pannus was removed through a transverse incision that extended from hip to hip, measuring 90 cm in length. Following panniculectomy, abdominal wall reconstruction was performed by mobilizing the abdominal skin flap from the lower abdominal panniculectomy incision (avoiding a T-shaped incision with a traditionally high risk of dehiscence), and placement of biologic mesh as an underlay followed by fascial closure. Prevena Plus™ 125 (3M + KCI, San Antonio, TX) was applied for postoperative closed incisional negative pressure therapy (ciNPT) and continued for 10 days. No postoperative complications occurred. The incision healed without incident with no hernia recurrence at one year. ciNPT in high-risk patients can help minimize the risk of postoperative wound healing complications and should be considered in high-risk patients. Those patients undergoing combined procedures and especially morbidly obese patients undergoing combined abdominal wall reconstruction and panniculectomy are at particularly high risk for wound healing complications. ciNPT should be considered as a postoperative dressing of choice in this challenging patient population.

Citing Articles

Negative Pressure Wound Therapy After Abdominal Body Contouring: A Comparative Matched Analysis of Outcomes and Cost.

Morris M, Christopher A, Patel V, Onyekaba G, Broach R, Fischer J Plast Surg (Oakv). 2022; 30(4):360-367.

PMID: 36212102 PMC: 9537721. DOI: 10.1177/22925503211019627.


Negative Pressure Wound Therapy Prevents Hernia Recurrence in Simultaneous Ventral Hernia Repair and Panniculectomy.

Deldar R, Abu El Hawa A, Bovill J, Hipolito D, Tefera E, Bhanot P Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2022; 10(3):e4171.

PMID: 35265446 PMC: 8901215. DOI: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000004171.

References
1.
Stannard J, Robinson J, Anderson E, McGwin Jr G, Volgas D, Alonso J . Negative pressure wound therapy to treat hematomas and surgical incisions following high-energy trauma. J Trauma. 2006; 60(6):1301-6. DOI: 10.1097/01.ta.0000195996.73186.2e. View

2.
Schlosser K, Otero J, Lincourt A, Augenstein V . Management of Surgical Incisions Using Incisional Negative-Pressure Therapy. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2018; 143:15S-20S. DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000005307. View

3.
Saxena V, Hwang C, Huang S, Eichbaum Q, Ingber D, Orgill D . Vacuum-assisted closure: microdeformations of wounds and cell proliferation. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2004; 114(5):1086-96. DOI: 10.1097/01.prs.0000135330.51408.97. View

4.
Brown M, Adenuga P, Soltanian H . Massive panniculectomy in the super obese and super-super obese: retrospective comparison of primary closure versus partial open wound management. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013; 133(1):32-39. DOI: 10.1097/01.prs.0000436818.34332.34. View

5.
Conde-Green A, Chung T, Holton 3rd L, Hui-Chou H, Zhu Y, Wang H . Incisional negative-pressure wound therapy versus conventional dressings following abdominal wall reconstruction: a comparative study. Ann Plast Surg. 2012; 71(4):394-7. DOI: 10.1097/SAP.0b013e31824c9073. View