» Articles » PMID: 32846864

Clinical Outcome of Different Skin Closure in Total-knee Arthroplasty: Running Subcuticular Closure Vs Intermittent Closure: A Retrospective Study

Overview
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2020 Aug 28
PMID 32846864
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

An intermittent closure with silk suture is routinely used for closing different surgical wounds. However, subcuticular closure with absorbable sutures has gained considerable attention due to convenience and better cosmetic appearance.To compare the clinical outcomes and risk of surgical-site infection of subcuticular and intermittent closure after total-knee arthroplasty (TKA), 106 patients that underwent TKA between January 2017 to June 2019 at the Department of Orthopedics in Xiangya Hospital of Centre South University were retrospectively assessed. Forty-three had received running subcuticular closure (group A) and 58 underwent intermittent closure (group B). The Knee Society score was measured before and 6 months after operation. Inflammation markers including the serum levels of procalcitonin, interleukin-6, and C-reactive protein, and the erythrocyte sedimentation rate were evaluated before operation, 1 day after and 1 month after operation. Patient satisfaction with the closure was evaluated using the Likert scale at the last follow-up.No significant difference was seen in the 6-month postoperative Knee Society score, or in the 1-day and 6-month postoperative inflammation marker levels between both groups (P > .05). Likert scores were higher in group A compared to group B (4.0 ± 1.0 vs 3.6 ± 1.2, P < .05).Running subcuticular closure after TKA results in a better appearance compared to intermittent closure, although neither method has an advantage in terms of efficacy and risk of infection.

Citing Articles

Consensus document on the management of wound closure in orthopaedic surgery.

Sanz-Ruiz P, Caeiro-Rey J, Martinez-Pastor J, Martin-Alguacil J, Murcia-Asensio A, Moreta J EFORT Open Rev. 2025; 10(2):82-94.

PMID: 40071985 PMC: 11825138. DOI: 10.1530/EOR-24-0002.


Clinical Outcomes Among Patients Undergoing Open Abdominal or Orthopedic Surgery with Wound Closure Incorporating Triclosan-Coated Barbed Sutures: A Multi-Institutional, Retrospective Database Study.

Fortin S, Spychaj K, Tomaszewski J, Grebeck H, Yalla R, Coplan P Med Devices (Auckl). 2025; 18:161-176.

PMID: 40071132 PMC: 11894428. DOI: 10.2147/MDER.S508169.


Epidermoid cyst beneath the scar after total knee arthroplasty: a case report.

Ying L, Luo H, Ying X, Zhu Z J Surg Case Rep. 2023; 2023(4):rjad208.

PMID: 37124578 PMC: 10132947. DOI: 10.1093/jscr/rjad208.


Erythrocyte sedimentation rate, C-reactive protein, and interleukin-6 as inflammatory biomarkers in dogs naturally infected with .

Asawapattanakul T, Pintapagung T, Piratae S, Juntautsa S, Chancharoen P Vet World. 2021; 14(9):2325-2331.

PMID: 34840450 PMC: 8613769. DOI: 10.14202/vetworld.2021.2325-2331.

References
1.
Parvizi J . New definition for periprosthetic joint infection. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2012; 40(12):614-5. View

2.
Smith E, DiSegna S, Shukla P, Matzkin E . Barbed versus traditional sutures: closure time, cost, and wound related outcomes in total joint arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2013; 29(2):283-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2013.05.031. View

3.
Lin S, Chang F, Huang T, Peng K, Shih H, Lee M . Temporal Change of Interleukin-6, C-Reactive Protein, and Skin Temperature after Total Knee Arthroplasty Using Triclosan-Coated Sutures. Biomed Res Int. 2018; 2018:9136208. PMC: 5820568. DOI: 10.1155/2018/9136208. View

4.
Roerdink R, Plat A, van Hove R, Leenders A, van der Zwaard B . Reduced wound leakage in arthroplasty with modified wound closure: a retrospective cohort study. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2019; 139(11):1505-1510. DOI: 10.1007/s00402-019-03178-8. View

5.
Yuenyongviwat V, Iamthanaporn K, Hongnaparak T, Tangtrakulwanich B . A randomised controlled trial comparing skin closure in total knee arthroplasty in the same knee: nylon sutures versus skin staples. Bone Joint Res. 2016; 5(5):185-90. PMC: 4921055. DOI: 10.1302/2046-3758.55.2000629. View