» Articles » PMID: 32843341

A Recurrent Circuit Implements Normalization, Simulating the Dynamics of V1 Activity

Overview
Specialty Science
Date 2020 Aug 27
PMID 32843341
Citations 22
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The normalization model has been applied to explain neural activity in diverse neural systems including primary visual cortex (V1). The model's defining characteristic is that the response of each neuron is divided by a factor that includes a weighted sum of activity of a pool of neurons. Despite the success of the normalization model, there are three unresolved issues. 1) Experimental evidence supports the hypothesis that normalization in V1 operates via recurrent amplification, i.e., amplifying weak inputs more than strong inputs. It is unknown how normalization arises from recurrent amplification. 2) Experiments have demonstrated that normalization is weighted such that each weight specifies how one neuron contributes to another's normalization pool. It is unknown how weighted normalization arises from a recurrent circuit. 3) Neural activity in V1 exhibits complex dynamics, including gamma oscillations, linked to normalization. It is unknown how these dynamics emerge from normalization. Here, a family of recurrent circuit models is reported, each of which comprises coupled neural integrators to implement normalization via recurrent amplification with arbitrary normalization weights, some of which can recapitulate key experimental observations of the dynamics of neural activity in V1.

Citing Articles

Temporal dynamics of energy-efficient coding in mouse primary visual cortex.

Moosavi S, Pastor A, Ornelas A, Tring E, Ringach D bioRxiv. 2025; .

PMID: 39763769 PMC: 11702630. DOI: 10.1101/2024.12.17.628997.


Neuronal heterogeneity of normalization strength in a circuit model.

Song D, Ruff D, Cohen M, Huang C bioRxiv. 2024; .

PMID: 39605397 PMC: 11601594. DOI: 10.1101/2024.11.22.624903.


Unconditional stability of a recurrent neural circuit implementing divisive normalization.

Rawat S, Heeger D, Martiniani S ArXiv. 2024; .

PMID: 39398197 PMC: 11469413.


Contrast gain control is a reparameterization of a population response curve.

Tring E, Moosavi S, Dipoppa M, Ringach D J Neurophysiol. 2024; 132(5):1359-1370.

PMID: 39292873 PMC: 11573281. DOI: 10.1152/jn.00336.2024.


Contrast gain control is a reparameterization of a population response curve.

Tring E, Moosavi S, Dipoppa M, Ringach D bioRxiv. 2024; .

PMID: 39131329 PMC: 11312465. DOI: 10.1101/2024.07.29.605608.


References
1.
Chung S, Ferster D . Strength and orientation tuning of the thalamic input to simple cells revealed by electrically evoked cortical suppression. Neuron. 1998; 20(6):1177-89. DOI: 10.1016/s0896-6273(00)80498-5. View

2.
Anderson J, Lampl I, Gillespie D, Ferster D . The contribution of noise to contrast invariance of orientation tuning in cat visual cortex. Science. 2000; 290(5498):1968-72. DOI: 10.1126/science.290.5498.1968. View

3.
Miller K, Troyer T . Neural noise can explain expansive, power-law nonlinearities in neural response functions. J Neurophysiol. 2002; 87(2):653-9. DOI: 10.1152/jn.00425.2001. View

4.
Brosch T, Neumann H . Computing with a canonical neural circuits model with pool normalization and modulating feedback. Neural Comput. 2014; 26(12):2735-89. DOI: 10.1162/NECO_a_00675. View

5.
Adesnik H, Scanziani M . Lateral competition for cortical space by layer-specific horizontal circuits. Nature. 2010; 464(7292):1155-60. PMC: 2908490. DOI: 10.1038/nature08935. View