» Articles » PMID: 32840740

Pregnancy Outcomes of Single/Double Blastocysts and Cleavage Embryo Transfers: a Retrospective Cohort Study of 24,422 Frozen-Thawed Cycles

Overview
Journal Reprod Sci
Publisher Springer
Date 2020 Aug 26
PMID 32840740
Citations 9
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

This study aims to evaluate the effect of blastocyst- and cleavage-stage embryo transfers with different numbers of transferred embryos on pregnancy outcomes in China. This was a retrospective cohort study that collected 24,422 frozen-thawed embryo transfer (FET) cycles in two affiliated hospitals of Peking University Health Science Center between January 2015 and May 2018. They were divided into four groups: the single cleavage-stage embryo transfer group (C-1) (763 cycles), double cleavage-stage embryo transfer group (C-2) (13,004 cycles), single blastocyst-stage embryo transfer group (B-1) (7913 cycles), and double blastocyst-stage embryo transfer group (B-2) (2046 cycles). Of the four groups, the live birth rate was the lowest in the C-1 group (11.8%) while it was the highest in the B-2 group (33.6%). However, the B-2 group was accompanied with higher risks of miscarriages, maternal complications, twin births, preterm births, and low birth weight. Compared with the C-2 group, the B-1 group had a lower live birth rate (23.0 vs 29.0%; aOR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.72-0.85), but also had a lower risk for twin births (1.9 vs 23.4%; aOR, 0.06; 95% CI, 0.04-0.09) and preterm births (9.6 vs 16.1%; aOR, 0.51; 95% CI, 0.41-0.65). The probability of live birth in the B-1 group declined from 0.25 at 20-29 years old to 0.08 at > 40 years old, while the probabilities of adverse outcomes went up with maternal age. It can be concluded that single-blastocyst embryo transfer seems to be the best choice for all maternal ages. This group of embryo transfer has significantly reduced adverse neonatal outcomes. Especially, women with younger maternal age in this group appear to prominently benefit from single-blastocyst transfer.

Citing Articles

Comparison of pregnancy outcomes between 4th day morula and 5th day blastocyst after embryo transfer: a retrospective cohort study.

Sun Y, Shen Q, Xi H, Sui L, Fu Y, Zhao J BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2024; 24(1):458.

PMID: 38961359 PMC: 11223283. DOI: 10.1186/s12884-024-06597-7.


Effect of GnRH agonist down-regulation combined with hormone replacement treatment on reproductive outcomes of frozen blastocyst transfer cycles in women of different ages.

Xie J, Lu J, Zhang H PeerJ. 2024; 12:e17447.

PMID: 38832029 PMC: 11146325. DOI: 10.7717/peerj.17447.


Trade-off between double cleavage-stage embryos transfer and single blastocyst-stage embryo transfer in patients with few good quality embryos in antagonist cycles: a retrospective study using a propensity score matching analysis.

Han Y, Deng X, Cai J, Peng W, Duan C, Huang K BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2024; 24(1):339.

PMID: 38702596 PMC: 11067270. DOI: 10.1186/s12884-024-06537-5.


Presence of Adenomyosis Impairs Clinical Outcomes in Women Undergoing Frozen Embryo Transfer: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Sachs-Guedj N, Coroleu B, Pascual M, Rodriguez I, Polyzos N J Clin Med. 2023; 12(18).

PMID: 37762998 PMC: 10531755. DOI: 10.3390/jcm12186058.


Prediction model for day 3 embryo implantation potential based on metabolites in spent embryo culture medium.

Liang R, Duan S, Fu M, Chen Y, Wang P, Fan Y BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2023; 23(1):425.

PMID: 37291503 PMC: 10249307. DOI: 10.1186/s12884-023-05666-7.


References
1.
Tannus S, Son W, Dahan M . Elective single blastocyst transfer in advanced maternal age. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2017; 34(6):741-748. PMC: 5445045. DOI: 10.1007/s10815-017-0906-6. View

2.
Kanter J, Boulet S, Kawwass J, Jamieson D, Kissin D . Trends and correlates of monozygotic twinning after single embryo transfer. Obstet Gynecol. 2015; 125(1):111-117. PMC: 4515956. DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000000579. View

3.
Martins W, Nastri C, Rienzi L, van der Poel S, Gracia C, Racowsky C . Blastocyst vs cleavage-stage embryo transfer: systematic review and meta-analysis of reproductive outcomes. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2016; 49(5):583-591. DOI: 10.1002/uog.17327. View

4.
Knopman J, Krey L, Oh C, Lee J, McCaffrey C, Noyes N . What makes them split? Identifying risk factors that lead to monozygotic twins after in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril. 2014; 102(1):82-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.03.039. View

5.
Kontopoulos G, Simopoulou M, Zervomanolakis I, Prokopakis T, Dimitropoulos K, Dedoulis E . Cleavage Stage versus Blastocyst Stage Embryo Transfer in Oocyte Donation Cycles. Medicina (Kaunas). 2019; 55(6). PMC: 6631639. DOI: 10.3390/medicina55060293. View