» Articles » PMID: 32836841

What Policies Address Both the Coronavirus Crisis and the Climate Crisis?

Overview
Date 2020 Aug 25
PMID 32836841
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The coronavirus pandemic has led many countries to initiate unprecedented economic recovery packages. Policymakers tackling the coronavirus crisis have also been encouraged to prioritize policies which help mitigate a second, looming crisis: climate change. We identify and analyze policies that combat both the coronavirus crisis and the climate crisis. We analyze both the long-run climate impacts from coronavirus-related economic recovery policies, and the impacts of long-run climate policies on economic recovery and public health post-recession. We base our analysis on data on emissions, employment and corona-related layoffs across sectors, and on previous research. We show that, among climate policies, labor-intensive green infrastructure projects, planting trees, and in particular pricing carbon coupled with reduced labor taxation boost economic recovery. Among coronavirus policies, aiding services sectors (leisure services such as restaurants and culture, or professional services such as technology), education and the healthcare sector appear most promising, being labor intensive yet low-emission-if such sectoral aid is conditioned on being directed towards employment and on low-carbon supply chains. Large-scale green infrastructure projects and green R&D investment, while good for the climate, are unlikely to generate enough employment to effectively alleviate the coronavirus crisis.

Citing Articles

Eco-Friendly and COVID-19 Friendly? Decreasing the Carbon Footprint of the Operating Room in the COVID-19 Era.

Tsagkaris C, Saeed H, Laubscher L, Eleftheriades A, Stavros S, Drakaki E Diseases. 2023; 11(4).

PMID: 37987268 PMC: 10660860. DOI: 10.3390/diseases11040157.


The influence of a quick educational video intervention on COVID-19-related knowledge in Ecuador.

Faytong-Haro M, Camacho-Leon G, Paez-Pluas R, Sarfraz A, Sarfraz Z, Michel J PLoS One. 2023; 18(10):e0291709.

PMID: 37796963 PMC: 10553301. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0291709.


Most industrialised countries have peaked carbon dioxide emissions during economic crises through strengthened structural change.

Bersalli G, Trondle T, Lilliestam J Commun Earth Environ. 2023; 4(1):44.

PMID: 36844953 PMC: 9942058. DOI: 10.1038/s43247-023-00687-8.


Public expectations about the impact of COVID-19 on climate action by citizens and government.

Savin I, Drews S, van den Bergh J, Villamayor-Tomas S PLoS One. 2022; 17(6):e0266979.

PMID: 35679285 PMC: 9182260. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0266979.


Climate concern and policy acceptance before and after COVID-19.

Drews S, Savin I, van den Bergh J, Villamayor-Tomas S Ecol Econ. 2022; 199:107507.

PMID: 35669404 PMC: 9156952. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2022.107507.


References
1.
Ogen Y . Assessing nitrogen dioxide (NO) levels as a contributing factor to coronavirus (COVID-19) fatality. Sci Total Environ. 2020; 726:138605. PMC: 7151460. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138605. View

2.
Dupas P, Robinson J . Why Don’t the Poor Save More? Evidence from Health Savings Experiments. Am Econ Rev. 2018; 103(4):1138-71. DOI: 10.1257/aer.103.4.1138. View

3.
Pike J, Bogich T, Elwood S, Finnoff D, Daszak P . Economic optimization of a global strategy to address the pandemic threat. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014; 111(52):18519-23. PMC: 4284561. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1412661112. View

4.
Ferrari R, Di Pasquale G, Rapezzi C . Commentary: What is the relationship between Covid-19 and cardiovascular disease?. Int J Cardiol. 2020; 310:167-168. PMC: 7138145. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2020.03.074. View

5.
Pucher J, Buehler R, Bassett D, Dannenberg A . Walking and cycling to health: a comparative analysis of city, state, and international data. Am J Public Health. 2010; 100(10):1986-92. PMC: 2937005. DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2009.189324. View