» Articles » PMID: 32833984

Why (not) Participate in Citizen Science? Motivational Factors and Barriers to Participate in a Citizen Science Program for Malaria Control in Rwanda

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2020 Aug 25
PMID 32833984
Citations 8
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

This study explores the motivational factors and barriers to participate in a citizen science program for malaria control in Rwanda. It assesses the changes in motivational factors over time and compares these factors among age and gender groups. Using a qualitative approach, this study involved 44 participants. At the initial stage, people participated in the program because of curiosity, desire to learn new things, helping others, and willingness to contribute to malaria control. As the engagement continued, other factors including ease of use of materials to report observations, the usefulness of the program, and recognition also played a crucial role in the retention of volunteers. Lack of time and information about the recruitment process, perceived low efficacy of the mosquito trap, and difficulties in collecting observations were reported as barriers to get and stay involved. Some variations in the motivational factors were observed among age and gender groups. At the initial phase, young adults and adults, as well as men and women were almost equally motivated to contribute to malaria control. For the ongoing phase, for age, the two groups were almost equally motivated by recognition of their effort. Also, the opportunity for learning was an important factor among young adults while ease of use of the materials was central for adults. For gender, the usefulness of the project, ease of use of materials, and learning opportunities were important motivational factors among women, while men were more motivated by recognition of their efforts. A framework including motivational factors and barriers at each stage of participation is presented. This framework may be used to explore motivations and barriers in future citizen science projects and might help coordinators of citizen science programs to determine whom to target, by which message, and at what stage of participation to retain volunteers in citizen science projects.

Citing Articles

Factors affecting community participation in drone-based larviciding using Bacillus thuringiensis var. israelensis (Bti) for bio-control of malaria vectors in Rwanda.

Munyakanage D, Niyituma E, Mutabazi A, Misago X, Musanabaganwa C, Remera E Malar J. 2025; 24(1):67.

PMID: 40025519 PMC: 11872309. DOI: 10.1186/s12936-025-05310-z.


Why becoming a positive deviant for malaria prevention and control: a sequential explanatory mixed methods study in Bugesera district, Rwanda.

Asingizwe D, Tuyizere M, Mukeshimana M, Nyandwi T, Kanakuze C, Hakizimana E Malar J. 2024; 23(1):284.

PMID: 39300522 PMC: 11414207. DOI: 10.1186/s12936-024-05108-5.


Community-Partnered Research appraisal tool for conducting, reporting and assessing community-based research.

Park A, Van Draanen J BMJ Open. 2024; 14(4):e081625.

PMID: 38670613 PMC: 11057323. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-081625.


Kefir4All, a citizen science initiative to raise awareness of the roles that microbes play in food fermentation.

Walsh L, Breselge S, Martin J, Coakley M, Ferguson E, Stapleton A J Microbiol Biol Educ. 2024; 25(1):e0015523.

PMID: 38661415 PMC: 11044645. DOI: 10.1128/jmbe.00155-23.


Citizen Science Studies in Nursing: A Systematic Review.

Torro-Pons C, Saus-Ortega C, Ballestar-Tarin M Nurs Rep. 2024; 14(2):946-960.

PMID: 38651484 PMC: 11036250. DOI: 10.3390/nursrep14020072.


References
1.
Brouwer S, Hessels L . Increasing research impact with citizen science: The influence of recruitment strategies on sample diversity. Public Underst Sci. 2019; 28(5):606-621. DOI: 10.1177/0963662519840934. View

2.
Hsieh H, Shannon S . Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qual Health Res. 2005; 15(9):1277-88. DOI: 10.1177/1049732305276687. View

3.
Fienieg B, Nierkens V, Tonkens E, Plochg T, Stronks K . Why play an active role? A qualitative examination of lay citizens' main motives for participation in health promotion. Health Promot Int. 2011; 27(3):416-26. DOI: 10.1093/heapro/dar047. View

4.
Tong A, Sainsbury P, Craig J . Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. Int J Qual Health Care. 2007; 19(6):349-57. DOI: 10.1093/intqhc/mzm042. View

5.
Follett R, Strezov V . An Analysis of Citizen Science Based Research: Usage and Publication Patterns. PLoS One. 2015; 10(11):e0143687. PMC: 4658079. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0143687. View