» Articles » PMID: 32832731

An Intelligent System for Improving Adherence to Guidelines on Acute Stroke

Overview
Specialty Emergency Medicine
Date 2020 Aug 25
PMID 32832731
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: A timely, accurate assessment and decision-making process is essential for the diagnosis and treatment of the acute stroke, which is the world's third leading cause of death. This process is often performed using the traditional method that increases the complexity, duration, and medical errors. The present study aimed to design and evaluate an intelligent system for improving adherence to the guidelines on the assessment and treatment of acute stroke patients.

Methods: Decision-making rules and data elements were used to predict the severity and to treat patients according to the specialists' opinions and guidelines. A system was then developed based on the intelligent decision-making algorithms. The system was finally evaluated by measuring the accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, applicability, performance, esthetics, information quality, and completeness and rates of medical errors. The segmented regression model was used to evaluate the effect of systems on the level and the trend of guideline adherence for the assessment and treatment of acute stroke.

Results: Fifty-three data elements were identified and used in the data collection and comprehensive decision-making rules. The rules were organized in a decision tree. In our analysis, 150 patients were included. The system accuracy was 98.30%. Evaluation results indicated an error rate of 1.69% by traditional methods. Documentation quality (completeness) increased from 78.66% to 100%. The average score of system quality was 4.60 indicating an acceptable range. After the system intervention, the mean of the adherence to the guideline significantly increased from 65% to 99.5% ( < 0.0008).

Conclusion: The designed system was accurate and can improve adherence to the guideline for the severity assessment and the determination of a therapeutic trend for acute stroke patients. It leads to physicians' empowerment, significantly reduces medical errors, and improves the documentation quality.

Citing Articles

From guidelines to clinical practice in care for ischaemic stroke patients: A systematic review and expert opinion.

Lens C, Demeestere J, Casolla B, Christensen H, Fischer U, Kelly P Eur J Neurol. 2024; 31(12):e16417.

PMID: 39236303 PMC: 11554874. DOI: 10.1111/ene.16417.


Interoperability of heterogeneous health information systems: a systematic literature review.

Torab-Miandoab A, Samad-Soltani T, Jodati A, Rezaei-Hachesu P BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2023; 23(1):18.

PMID: 36694161 PMC: 9875417. DOI: 10.1186/s12911-023-02115-5.


How to Improve the Management of Acute Ischemic Stroke by Modern Technologies, Artificial Intelligence, and New Treatment Methods.

Zelenak K, Krajina A, Meyer L, Fiehler J, Esmint Artificial Intelligence And Robotics Ad Hoc Committee , Behme D Life (Basel). 2021; 11(6).

PMID: 34072071 PMC: 8229281. DOI: 10.3390/life11060488.

References
1.
Fukuoka Y, Kamitani E, Dracup K, Jong S . New insights into compliance with a mobile phone diary and pedometer use in sedentary women. J Phys Act Health. 2011; 8(3):398-403. PMC: 4036092. DOI: 10.1123/jpah.8.3.398. View

2.
Roudbary S, Saadat F, Forghanparast K, Sohrabnejad R . Serum C-reactive protein level as a biomarker for differentiation of ischemic from hemorrhagic stroke. Acta Med Iran. 2011; 49(3):149-52. View

3.
Nistal-Nuno B . Segmented regression analysis of interrupted time series data to assess outcomes of a South American road traffic alcohol policy change. Public Health. 2017; 150:51-59. DOI: 10.1016/j.puhe.2017.04.025. View

4.
Lehmann C . Medical information systems in pediatrics. Pediatrics. 2003; 111(3):679. DOI: 10.1542/peds.111.3.679. View

5.
Rothschild J, Hurley A, Landrigan C, Cronin J, Martell-Waldrop K, Foskett C . Recovery from medical errors: the critical care nursing safety net. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2006; 32(2):63-72. DOI: 10.1016/s1553-7250(06)32009-0. View