» Articles » PMID: 32832729

Contribution of Caval Index and Ejection Fraction Estimated by E-point Septal Separation Measured by Emergency Physicians in the Clinical Diagnosis of Acute Heart Failure

Overview
Specialty Emergency Medicine
Date 2020 Aug 25
PMID 32832729
Citations 1
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: Although the reliability of e-point septal separation (EPSS) and caval index (CI) is proven in the diagnosis of acute heart failure (AHF), how much they contribute to the initial clinical impression is unclear. This study aimed to determine the diagnostic contribution of EPSS and CI to the initial clinical impression of AHF.

Methods: This is a prospective observational study conducted in an academic emergency department (ED). The patients admitted to the ED with acute undifferentiated dyspnea were included. Primary diagnosis was made after an initial clinical evaluation, and a secondary diagnosis was made after EPSS and CI measurements. Independent cardiologists made the final diagnosis. The primary outcome was the diagnostic contribution of EPSS and CI to the primary diagnosis.

Results: A total of 182 patients were included in the study. The primary diagnosis was found with a sensitivity of 0.55 and specificity of 0.84 and the secondary diagnosis was determined with a sensitivity of 0.78 and specificity of 0.83 in predicting the final diagnosis. The agreement coefficient between the primary and final diagnosis was 0.44 and between the secondary diagnosis and the final diagnosis was 0.61. When the primary diagnosis was coherent with secondary diagnosis, sensitivity and specificity were found to be 0.74 and 0.90, respectively.

Conclusion: Although a detailed history and physical examination are the essential factors in shaping clinical perception, CI and EPSS combined significantly contribute to the initial clinical impression.

Citing Articles

The Association Between Hyponatremia and Optic Nerve Sheath Diameter: A Prospective Study.

Duyan M, Vural N Cureus. 2023; 15(1):e34084.

PMID: 36843796 PMC: 9945814. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.34084.

References
1.
Labovitz A, Noble V, Bierig M, Goldstein S, Jones R, Kort S . Focused cardiac ultrasound in the emergent setting: a consensus statement of the American Society of Echocardiography and American College of Emergency Physicians. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2010; 23(12):1225-30. DOI: 10.1016/j.echo.2010.10.005. View

2.
Anderson K, Jenq K, Fields J, Panebianco N, Dean A . Diagnosing heart failure among acutely dyspneic patients with cardiac, inferior vena cava, and lung ultrasonography. Am J Emerg Med. 2013; 31(8):1208-14. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajem.2013.05.007. View

3.
Randazzo M, Snoey E, Levitt M, Binder K . Accuracy of emergency physician assessment of left ventricular ejection fraction and central venous pressure using echocardiography. Acad Emerg Med. 2003; 10(9):973-7. DOI: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2003.tb00654.x. View

4.
Ponikowski P, Voors A, Anker S, Bueno H, Cleland J, Coats A . 2016 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure: The Task Force for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Developed with the special.... Eur J Heart Fail. 2016; 18(8):891-975. DOI: 10.1002/ejhf.592. View

5.
Satilmis Siliv N, Yamanoglu A, Pinar P, Celebi Yamanoglu N, Torlak F, Parlak I . Estimation of Cardiac Systolic Function Based on Mitral Valve Movements: An Accurate Bedside Tool for Emergency Physicians in Dyspneic Patients. J Ultrasound Med. 2018; 38(4):1027-1038. DOI: 10.1002/jum.14791. View