» Articles » PMID: 32830494

Bats and Wind Farms: The Role and Importance of the Baltic Sea Countries in the European Context of Power Transition and Biodiversity Conservation

Overview
Date 2020 Aug 25
PMID 32830494
Citations 1
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Although labeled as environmentally friendly, wind power can have negative impacts on the environment, such as habitat destruction or wildlife fatalities. Considering the distribution and migratory characteristics of European bats, the negative effects of wind power should be addressed on an appropriate scale. This review summarizes the current state of knowledge on interactions between wind farms and bats in Europe, and compares it with the situation in the countries of the European boreal biogeographic region. We analyzed data from papers published in international and national scientific journals, focusing on studies conducted in Europe. The issue of the impacts wind power has on bats is clearly overlooked in most of the countries of the European boreal region, with low volumes of research available on the topic. This is probably due to fewer wind farms in the area, making this recent issue a less-prioritized topic. However, the Baltic Sea, and the countries surrounding it, are of extreme importance with regards to bat migration, especially for the . Therefore, more research on wind power and bats is needed in this region, as well as more cooperation between all the stakeholders.

Citing Articles

Contrasting Seasonal Distribution Patterns of Two Boreal Aerial Hawking Bat Species in Finland.

Lundberg P, Kotila M, Meramo K, Suominen K, Suutari M, Pietikainen T Ecol Evol. 2025; 15(1):e70599.

PMID: 39830710 PMC: 11738648. DOI: 10.1002/ece3.70599.


The devil is in the detail: Environmental variables frequently used for habitat suitability modeling lack information for forest-dwelling bats in Germany.

Bald L, Gottwald J, Hillen J, Adorf F, Zeuss D Ecol Evol. 2024; 14(6):e11571.

PMID: 38932971 PMC: 11199919. DOI: 10.1002/ece3.11571.


A Palearctic view of a bat fungal disease.

Whiting-Fawcett F, Blomberg A, Troitsky T, Meierhofer M, Field K, Puechmaille S Conserv Biol. 2024; 39(1):e14265.

PMID: 38616727 PMC: 11780211. DOI: 10.1111/cobi.14265.

References
1.
Lueken C, Cohen G, Apt J . Costs of solar and wind power variability for reducing CO2 emissions. Environ Sci Technol. 2012; 46(17):9761-7. DOI: 10.1021/es204392a. View

2.
Roeleke M, Blohm T, Kramer-Schadt S, Yovel Y, Voigt C . Habitat use of bats in relation to wind turbines revealed by GPS tracking. Sci Rep. 2016; 6:28961. PMC: 4931514. DOI: 10.1038/srep28961. View

3.
Voigt C, Roeleke M, Marggraf L, Petersons G, Voigt-Heucke S . Migratory bats respond to artificial green light with positive phototaxis. PLoS One. 2017; 12(5):e0177748. PMC: 5451015. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0177748. View

4.
Vesterinen E, Lilley T, Laine V, Wahlberg N . Next generation sequencing of fecal DNA reveals the dietary diversity of the widespread insectivorous predator Daubenton's Bat (Myotis daubentonii) in Southwestern Finland. PLoS One. 2013; 8(11):e82168. PMC: 3842304. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0082168. View

5.
Schuster E, Bulling L, Koppel J . Consolidating the State of Knowledge: A Synoptical Review of Wind Energy's Wildlife Effects. Environ Manage. 2015; 56(2):300-31. PMC: 4493795. DOI: 10.1007/s00267-015-0501-5. View