Serum CA19-9, CA-125 and CEA As Tumor Markers for Mucinous Ovarian Tumors
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Aim: To analyze the use of serum cancer antigen 19-9 (CA19-9), cancer antigen 125 (CA-125) and carcinoembryogenic antigen (CEA) in predicting the malignant potential of mucinous ovarian tumor, and to assess the clinical factors associated with these tumors.
Methods: This retrospective study collected the data from 314 patients who were diagnosed with mucinous ovarian tumor. These patients had preoperative serum CA19-9, CA-125, CEA available and underwent surgery at Ramathibodi Hospital between January 2010 and December 2016. The diagnostic performance of CA19-9, CA-125 and CEA was analyzed using the receiver operator characteristic curve. The associations between clinicopathological factors and serum CA19-9, CA-125 and CEA level were also analyzed.
Results: A total of 314 patients were recruited in this study. They consisted of 221 patients with benign mucinous ovarian tumor (70.38%), 65 patients with borderline mucinous ovarian tumor (20.70%) and 28 patients with mucinous ovarian carcinoma (8.92%). Multivariate analysis revealed that the tumor size, elevated serum CA19-9, CA-125 and CEA influenced the tumor pathology. The mucinous ovarian tumor with large tumor size, elevated serum CA19-9, CA-125 and CEA more than the cut off values showed a positive correlation with the risk ratio of 1.60 (95% CI = 1.13-2.28; P = 0.005), 1.74 (95% CI = 1.22-2.47; P = 0.002), 1.90 (95% CI = 1.34-2.70; P < 0.001), 1.58 (95% CI = 1.10-2.29; P = 0.020), respectively. CA-125 provided the highest diagnostic performance, with an area under receiver operator characteristic curve of 0.745, to differentiate between borderline, malignant or benign mucinous ovarian tumor.
Conclusion: Preoperative elevation of the serum CA19-9, CA-125, CEA and tumor size are useful predictors to differentiate between benign, borderline and malignant mucinous ovarian tumor. The best predictor is CA-125, followed by CA19-9 and CEA.
Ruma S, Vinod R, Jain S, Huhtinen K, Hynninen J, Leivo J Sci Rep. 2025; 15(1):3171.
PMID: 39863644 PMC: 11762729. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-025-86735-z.
Li N, Li M, Zhou F Am J Transl Res. 2024; 16(10):5497-5506.
PMID: 39544801 PMC: 11558377. DOI: 10.62347/QVCI6027.
Olaofe O, Betiku O, Okongwu C, Adefidipe A, Soremekun A BMC Womens Health. 2024; 24(1):566.
PMID: 39434109 PMC: 11492697. DOI: 10.1186/s12905-024-03408-1.
Shahbazlou S, Vandghanooni S, Dabirmanesh B, Eskandani M, Hasannia S Mikrochim Acta. 2024; 191(11):659.
PMID: 39382786 DOI: 10.1007/s00604-024-06740-3.
Diagnostic Challenges and Treatment Options for Mucocle of the Appendix: A Comprehensive Review.
Gopalan V, Ali Khan I, Zade A, Malhotra G, Durge S, Jain Y Cureus. 2024; 16(8):e66142.
PMID: 39233991 PMC: 11374133. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.66142.