» Articles » PMID: 32830105

Clinician and Patient Beliefs About Diagnostic Imaging for Low Back Pain: a Systematic Qualitative Evidence Synthesis

Overview
Journal BMJ Open
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2020 Aug 25
PMID 32830105
Citations 32
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: Overuse of diagnostic imaging for patients with low back pain remains common. The underlying beliefs about diagnostic imaging that could drive overuse remain unclear. We synthesised qualitative research that has explored clinician, patient or general public beliefs about diagnostic imaging for low back pain.

Design: A qualitative evidence synthesis using a thematic analysis.

Methods: We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, AMED and PsycINFO from inception to 17 June 2019. Qualitative studies that interviewed clinicians, patients and/or general public exploring beliefs about diagnostic imaging for low back pain were included. Four review authors independently extracted data and organised these according to themes and subthemes. We used the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme tool to critically appraise included studies. To assess confidence in review findings, we used the GRADE-Confidence in the Evidence from Reviews of Qualitative Research method.

Results: We included 69 qualitative studies with 1747 participants. Key findings included: Patients and clinicians believe diagnostic imaging is an important test to locate the source of low back pain (33 studies, high confidence); patients with chronic low back pain believe pathological findings on diagnostic imaging provide evidence that pain is real (12 studies, moderate confidence); and clinicians ordered diagnostic imaging to reduce the risk of a missed diagnosis that could lead to litigation, and to manage patients' expectations (12 studies, moderate confidence).

Conclusion: Clinicians and patients can believe that diagnostic imaging is an important tool for locating the source of non-specific low back pain. Patients may underestimate the harms of unnecessary imaging tests. These beliefs could be important targets for intervention.

Prospero Registration Number: CRD42017076047.

Citing Articles

"Gleaning a lot from the history and physical exam," and "reasonably confident without imaging": a qualitative study of primary care clinicians' management of patients with low back pain.

Haslam-Larmer L, Norman K, Patey A, Thomas I, Green M, Grimshaw J BMC Prim Care. 2025; 26(1):26.

PMID: 39910441 PMC: 11800448. DOI: 10.1186/s12875-025-02726-z.


It's Not Written All Over My Face: Constructing Chronic Pain as Invisible in Pain Clinic Consultations and Interviews.

Declercq J Clin J Pain. 2025; 41(3).

PMID: 39782005 PMC: 11801457. DOI: 10.1097/AJP.0000000000001273.


[Unhelpful believes about pain. Brief pain advice in primary care].

Garcia Espinosa M, Garcia Vila S, Fernandez de Paul M, Moreno Carrero P, Prieto Checa I, Izquierdo Enriquez G Aten Primaria. 2024; 56(12):103120.

PMID: 39499987 PMC: 11617624. DOI: 10.1016/j.aprim.2024.103120.


Norwegian general practitioners' and radiologists' perspectives on the referral, justification, and unnecessary imaging-a survey.

Kjelle E, Andersen E, Brandsaeter I, Hofmann B Scand J Prim Health Care. 2024; 42(4):574-581.

PMID: 38916978 PMC: 11552244. DOI: 10.1080/02813432.2024.2366247.


Chiropractors' perceptions on the use of spinal radiographs in clinical practice: a qualitative study.

Searant I, Brown B, Jenkins H Chiropr Man Therap. 2024; 32(1):23.

PMID: 38909258 PMC: 11193277. DOI: 10.1186/s12998-024-00547-y.


References
1.
Singh G, Newton C, OSullivan K, Soundy A, Heneghan N . Exploring the lived experience and chronic low back pain beliefs of English-speaking Punjabi and white British people: a qualitative study within the NHS. BMJ Open. 2018; 8(2):e020108. PMC: 5829944. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020108. View

2.
Espeland A, Baerheim A . General practitioners' views on radiology reports of plain radiography for back pain. Scand J Prim Health Care. 2007; 25(1):15-9. PMC: 3389447. DOI: 10.1080/02813430600973459. View

3.
Buchbinder R, Jolley D, Wyatt M . Population based intervention to change back pain beliefs and disability: three part evaluation. BMJ. 2001; 322(7301):1516-20. PMC: 33390. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.322.7301.1516. View

4.
Sloots M, Scheppers E, Bartels E, Dekker J, Geertzen J, Dekker J . First rehabilitation consultation in patients of non-native origin: factors that lead to tension in the patient-physician interaction. Disabil Rehabil. 2009; 31(22):1853-61. DOI: 10.1080/09638280902847085. View

5.
Lyons K, Salsbury S, Hondras M, Jones M, Andresen A, Goertz C . Perspectives of older adults on co-management of low back pain by doctors of chiropractic and family medicine physicians: a focus group study. BMC Complement Altern Med. 2013; 13:225. PMC: 3847523. DOI: 10.1186/1472-6882-13-225. View