» Articles » PMID: 32825399

Host Ant Change of a Socially Parasitic Butterfly () Through Host Nest Take-Over

Overview
Journal Insects
Specialty Biology
Date 2020 Aug 23
PMID 32825399
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The socially parasitic Alcon blue butterfly () starts its larval stage by feeding on the seeds of gentians, after which it completes development in the nests of suitable ant species. The host plant and host ant species can differ at the population level within a region, and local adaptation is common, but some host switches are observed. It has been suggested that one mechanism of change is through the re-adoption of caterpillars by different ant species, either through occupation of abandoned nests or take-over of established nests by competitively superior colonies. To test this question in the lab we introduced relatively strong colonies (50 workers) of alien species to the arenas of weaker colonies (two caterpillars with six workers), and to orphaned caterpillars (two caterpillars without ants). We used caterpillars from a xerophylic population of , and both local hosts, and , testing the possibility of host switch between these two host ant species during larval development. Most of the caterpillars were successfully readopted by alien ants, and survived well. Our results suggest higher ecological plasticity in host ant usage of this butterfly than generally thought.

Citing Articles

Ectoparasitic fungi of Myrmica ants alter the success of parasitic butterflies.

Tartally A, Szabo N, Somogyi A, Bathori F, Haelewaters D, Mucsi A Sci Rep. 2021; 11(1):24031.

PMID: 34911991 PMC: 8674344. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-02800-3.


A Unique Population in a Unique Area: The Alcon Blue Butterfly and Its Specific Parasitoid in the Białowieża Forest.

Dziekanska I, Nowicki P, Piroznikow E, Sielezniew M Insects. 2020; 11(10).

PMID: 33053630 PMC: 7601206. DOI: 10.3390/insects11100687.

References
1.
Martin S, Vitikainen E, Drijfhout F, Jackson D . Conspecific ant aggression is correlated with chemical distance, but not with genetic or spatial distance. Behav Genet. 2011; 42(2):323-31. DOI: 10.1007/s10519-011-9503-0. View

2.
Jansen G, Savolainen R, Vepsalainen K . Phylogeny, divergence-time estimation, biogeography and social parasite-host relationships of the Holarctic ant genus Myrmica (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2010; 56(1):294-304. DOI: 10.1016/j.ympev.2010.01.029. View

3.
Ness J, Morris W, Bronstein J . For ant-protected plants, the best defense is a hungry offense. Ecology. 2009; 90(10):2823-31. DOI: 10.1890/08-1580.1. View

4.
Schonrogge K, Wardlaw J, Peters A, Everett S, Thomas J, Elmes G . Changes in chemical signature and host specificity from larval retrieval to full social integration in the myrmecophilous butterfly Maculinea rebeli. J Chem Ecol. 2004; 30(1):91-107. DOI: 10.1023/b:joec.0000013184.18176.a9. View

5.
Thomas J, Wardlaw J . The capacity of a Myrmica ant nest to support a predacious species of Maculinea butterfly. Oecologia. 2017; 91(1):101-109. DOI: 10.1007/BF00317247. View