» Articles » PMID: 32820716

Do Changes in STEC Diagnostics Mislead Interpretation of Disease Surveillance Data in Switzerland? Time Trends in Positivity, 2007 to 2016

Overview
Journal Euro Surveill
Date 2020 Aug 22
PMID 32820716
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

BackgroundLaboratory-confirmed cases of Shiga toxin-producing (STEC) have been notifiable to the National Notification System for Infectious Diseases in Switzerland since 1999. Since 2015, a large increase in case numbers has been observed. Around the same time, syndromic multiplex PCR started to replace other diagnostic methods in standard laboratory practice for gastrointestinal pathogen testing, suggesting that the increase in notified cases is due to a change in test practices and numbers.AimThis study examined the impact of changes in diagnostic methods, in particular the introduction of multiplex PCR panels, on routine STEC surveillance data in Switzerland.MethodsWe analysed routine laboratory data from 11 laboratories, which reported 61.9% of all STEC cases from 2007 to 2016 to calculate the positivity, i.e. the rate of the number of positive STEC tests divided by the total number of tests performed.ResultsThe introduction of multiplex PCR had a strong impact on STEC test frequency and identified cases, with the number of tests performed increasing sevenfold from 2007 to 2016. Still, age- and sex-standardised positivity increased from 0.8% in 2007 to 1.7% in 2016.ConclusionIncreasing positivity suggests that the increase in case notifications cannot be attributed to an increase in test numbers alone. Therefore, we cannot exclude a real epidemiological trend for the observed increase. Modernising the notification system to address current gaps in information availability, e.g. diagnostic methods, and improved triangulation of clinical presentation, diagnostic and serotype information are needed to deal with emerging disease and technological advances.

Citing Articles

Determinants of Sporadic Shiga Toxin-Producing (STEC) Infection in Denmark, 2018-2020: A Matched Case-Control Study.

Kjelso C, de Sousa L, Scheutz F, Schjorring S, Ethelberg S, Kuhn K Microorganisms. 2024; 12(6).

PMID: 38930491 PMC: 11205556. DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms12061109.


Legionnaires' Disease on the Rise in Switzerland: A Denominator-Based Analysis of National Diagnostic Data, 2007-2016.

Fischer F, Schmutz C, Gaia V, Mausezahl D Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020; 17(19).

PMID: 33050023 PMC: 7579383. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17197343.

References
1.
Cronquist A, Mody R, Atkinson R, Besser J, DAngelo M, Hurd S . Impacts of culture-independent diagnostic practices on public health surveillance for bacterial enteric pathogens. Clin Infect Dis. 2012; 54 Suppl 5:S432-9. DOI: 10.1093/cid/cis267. View

2.
Antikainen J, Kantele A, Pakkanen S, Laaveri T, Riutta J, Vaara M . A quantitative polymerase chain reaction assay for rapid detection of 9 pathogens directly from stools of travelers with diarrhea. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2013; 11(10):1300-1307.e3. DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2013.03.037. View

3.
Kuehne A, Bouwknegt M, Havelaar A, Gilsdorf A, Hoyer P, Stark K . Estimating true incidence of O157 and non-O157 Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli illness in Germany based on notification data of haemolytic uraemic syndrome. Epidemiol Infect. 2016; 144(15):3305-3315. PMC: 9150202. DOI: 10.1017/S0950268816001436. View

4.
Stockmann C, Rogatcheva M, Harrel B, Vaughn M, Crisp R, Poritz M . How well does physician selection of microbiologic tests identify Clostridium difficile and other pathogens in paediatric diarrhoea? Insights using multiplex PCR-based detection. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2015; 21(2):179.e9-15. PMC: 4330102. DOI: 10.1016/j.cmi.2014.07.011. View

5.
Chart H . Are all infections with Escherichia coli O157 associated with cattle?. Lancet. 1998; 352(9133):1005. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)60072-4. View