» Articles » PMID: 32819338

Isolation of Novel Citrus and Plum Fruit Promoters and Their Functional Characterization for Fruit Biotechnology

Overview
Journal BMC Biotechnol
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Biotechnology
Date 2020 Aug 22
PMID 32819338
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Promoters that confer expression in fruit tissues are important tools for genetic engineering of fruit quality traits, yet few fruit-specific promoters have been identified, particularly for citrus fruit development.

Results: In this study, we report five citrus fruit-specific/preferential promoters for genetic engineering. Additionally, we have characterized a novel fruit-preferential promoter from plum. Genes specifically expressed in fruit tissues were selected and their isolated promoter regions were fused with the GUSPlus reporter gene for evaluation in transgenic plants. Stable transformation in Micro-Tom tomato demonstrated that the candidate promoter regions exhibit differing levels of expression and with varying degrees of fruit specificity.

Conclusions: Among the five candidate citrus promoters characterized in this study, the CitSEP promoter showed a fruit-specific expression pattern, while the CitWAX and CitJuSac promoters exhibited high fruit-preferential expression with strong activity in the fruit, weak activity in floral tissues and low or undetectable activity in other tissues. The CitVO1, CitUNK and PamMybA promoters, while exhibiting strong fruit-preferential expression, also showed consistent weak but detectable activity in leaves and other vegetative tissues. Use of these fruit specific/preferential promoters for genetic engineering can help with precise expression of beneficial genes and help with accurate prediction of the activity of new genes in host fruit plants.

Citing Articles

Tissue-specific expression of in Mexican lime () confers anthocyanin accumulation in fruit.

Thilmony R, Dasgupta K, Shao M, Harris D, Hartman J, Harden L Front Plant Sci. 2022; 13:945738.

PMID: 36003820 PMC: 9393592. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2022.945738.


Identification of essential element determining fruit-specific transcriptional activity in the tomato HISTIDINE DECARBOXYLASE A gene promoter.

Kim H, Park S, Park S, Ma S, Do J, Kim A Plant Cell Rep. 2022; 41(8):1721-1731.

PMID: 35739429 DOI: 10.1007/s00299-022-02886-7.


Citrus Genetic Transformation: An Overview of the Current Strategies and Insights on the New Emerging Technologies.

Conti G, Xoconostle-Cazares B, Marcelino-Perez G, Hopp H, Reyes C Front Plant Sci. 2021; 12:768197.

PMID: 34917104 PMC: 8670418. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2021.768197.

References
1.
Kesanakurti D, Kolattukudy P, Kirti P . Fruit-specific overexpression of wound-induced tap1 under E8 promoter in tomato confers resistance to fungal pathogens at ripening stage. Physiol Plant. 2012; 146(2):136-48. DOI: 10.1111/j.1399-3054.2012.01626.x. View

2.
Agius F, Amaya I, Botella M, Valpuesta V . Functional analysis of homologous and heterologous promoters in strawberry fruits using transient expression. J Exp Bot. 2004; 56(409):37-46. DOI: 10.1093/jxb/eri004. View

3.
Gambino G, Gribaudo I . Genetic transformation of fruit trees: current status and remaining challenges. Transgenic Res. 2012; 21(6):1163-81. DOI: 10.1007/s11248-012-9602-6. View

4.
Zou X, Jiang X, Xu L, Lei T, Peng A, He Y . Transgenic citrus expressing synthesized cecropin B genes in the phloem exhibits decreased susceptibility to Huanglongbing. Plant Mol Biol. 2016; 93(4-5):341-353. DOI: 10.1007/s11103-016-0565-5. View

5.
Ke X, Wang H, Li Y, Zhu B, Zang Y, He Y . Genome-Wide Identification and Analysis of Polygalacturonase Genes in . Int J Mol Sci. 2018; 19(8). PMC: 6121401. DOI: 10.3390/ijms19082290. View