» Articles » PMID: 32817410

In Vitro Fertilisation with Preimplantation Genetic Testing: the Need for Expanded Insurance Coverage

Overview
Journal J Med Ethics
Specialty Medical Ethics
Date 2020 Aug 21
PMID 32817410
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Technological advances in genetic testing have enabled prospective parents to learn about their risk of passing a genetic condition to their future children. One option for those who want to ensure that their biological children do not inherit a genetic condition is to create embryos through in vitro fertilisation (IVF) and use a technique called preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) to screen embryos for genetic abnormalities before implantation. Unfortunately, due to its high cost, IVF-with-PGT is out of reach for the vast majority of Americans. This article addresses an issue that has been underexplored in the medical ethics literature: the lack of insurance coverage for IVF-with-PGT.Within the US system, a key concept in insurance is that of medically necessary care, which broadly consists of diagnostic services and treatment services. In this article, I argue that IVF-with-PGT could be classified as either a diagnostic service or as a treatment service. To make this case, I show that IVF-with-PGT is similar to other types of services that are often covered by US insurance providers. In light of these similarities, I argue that the current system is inconsistent with respect to what is-and is not-covered by insurance. To promote consistency and fairness in coverage, like cases should be treated alike-starting with greater coverage for IVF-with-PGT.

Citing Articles

Preimplantation Genetic Testing for Adult-Onset Neurodegenerative Disease: Considerations for Access, Utilization, and Counseling.

Paul R, Baldwin A, Johnson K, Manning Peskin S, Tropea T, Azage M Neurology. 2023; 101(19):836-841.

PMID: 37596038 PMC: 10663009. DOI: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000207736.


Expecting more: the case for incorporating fertility services into comprehensive sickle cell disease care.

Pecker L, Oteng-Ntim E, Nero A, Lanzkron S, Christianson M, Woolford T Lancet Haematol. 2023; 10(3):e225-e234.

PMID: 36708736 PMC: 10318482. DOI: 10.1016/S2352-3026(22)00353-2.


Acceptable, hopeful, and useful: development and mixed-method evaluation of an educational tool about reproductive options for people with sickle cell disease or trait.

Early M, Strodel R, Lake I, Ruddy J, Saba J, Singh S J Assist Reprod Genet. 2021; 39(1):183-193.

PMID: 34806131 PMC: 8866599. DOI: 10.1007/s10815-021-02358-z.

References
1.
Tur-Kaspa I, Jeelani R, Doraiswamy P . Preimplantation genetic diagnosis for inherited neurological disorders. Nat Rev Neurol. 2014; 10(7):417-24. DOI: 10.1038/nrneurol.2014.84. View

2.
Kingma E . What is it to be healthy?. Analysis. 2008; 67(294):128-133. PMC: 2239248. DOI: 10.1093/analys/67.2.128. View

3.
Santosa K, Qi J, Kim H, Hamill J, Wilkins E, Pusic A . Long-term Patient-Reported Outcomes in Postmastectomy Breast Reconstruction. JAMA Surg. 2018; 153(10):891-899. PMC: 6233781. DOI: 10.1001/jamasurg.2018.1677. View

4.
Hallowell N, Badger S, Richardson S, Caldas C, Hardwick R, Fitzgerald R . High-risk individuals' perceptions of reproductive genetic testing for CDH1 mutations. Fam Cancer. 2017; 16(4):531-535. PMC: 6061929. DOI: 10.1007/s10689-017-9976-y. View

5.
Johnston J, Gusmano M . Why we should all pay for fertility treatment: an argument from ethics and policy. Hastings Cent Rep. 2013; 43(2):18-21. DOI: 10.1002/hast.155. View