Background:
Minimal clinically important difference (MCID), substantial clinical benefit (SCB), and patient acceptable symptomatic state (PASS) are emerging criteria for patient-based treatment assessments. However, few studies have investigated these measures after rotator cuff repair.
Purpose:
(1) To determine MCID, SCB, and PASS values for pain visual analog scale (pVAS), Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, and University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) score after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. (2) To determine factors for achieving the MCID, SCB, and PASS.
Study Design:
Cohort study (diagnosis); Level of evidence, 2.
Methods:
We analyzed prospectively collected data from a rotator cuff surgery registry between March 2018 and February 2019. Eighty-two patients were included, and anchor questions for deriving MCID, SCB, and PASS values were applied at 1-year follow-up after the surgery. The MCID and SCB for the pVAS, ASES, SANE, and UCLA scores were then derived via 2 methods: a sensitivity- and specificity-based approach, which was used alone to derive PASS values, and a between-patients approach. Additionally, univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to determine factors for achieving the MCID, SCB, and PASS.
Results:
All 4 scores showed acceptable areas under the curve. MCID, SCB, and PASS values for the pVAS were 1.5, 2.5, and 1.7; for ASES scores, 21.0, 26.0, and 78.0; for SANE, 13.0, 20.0, and 71.0; and for UCLA scores, 6.0, 8.0, and 23.0, respectively. Poor preoperative scores demonstrated significantly higher odds ratios (ORs) for achieving the MCID and SCB and lower ORs for achieving the PASS. Retear, large to massive tear, and older age showed lower ORs for achieving the MCID or SCB. For PASS items, male sex and biceps tenodesis had higher ORs, and older age had lower ORs. MCID, SCB, and PASS values per the sensitivity- and specificity-based approach were applied in factor analyses.
Conclusion:
Reliable MCID, SCB, and PASS values were obtained from patient evaluations 1 year after arthroscopic rotator cuff surgery. Poor preoperative score (MCID and SCB), male sex, and biceps tenodesis showed higher ORs, whereas poor preoperative score (PASS), retear, large to massive tear, and older age demonstrated lower ORs.
Citing Articles
Minimal clinically important difference (MCID), patient-acceptable symptom state (PASS), and substantial clinical benefit (SCB) following surgical knee ligament reconstruction: a systematic review.
Migliorini F, Maffulli N, Jeyaraman M, Schafer L, Rath B, Huber T
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2025; 51(1):32.
PMID: 39843864
DOI: 10.1007/s00068-024-02708-3.
Exploring the Efficacy of Joint Lavage in Knee Osteoarthritis: A Focus on Cytokines, Degrading Enzymes, and Oxidative Stress.
Dinc M, Soydemir O
Cartilage. 2024; :19476035241304526.
PMID: 39651682
PMC: 11626635.
DOI: 10.1177/19476035241304526.
The association between self-assessed improvement in mental health preceding rotator cuff repair and patient satisfaction: A retrospective cohort study.
Moore B, Allen D, Clark D, Somerson J
Shoulder Elbow. 2024; :17585732241274577.
PMID: 39552654
PMC: 11562387.
DOI: 10.1177/17585732241274577.
Establishing Clinical Significance for Patients Undergoing Arthroscopic Repair of Type II SLAP Lesions.
Parnes N, Magnuson J, Hettrich C, Oh L, Klahs K, Moses A
Orthop J Sports Med. 2024; 12(11):23259671241286520.
PMID: 39534389
PMC: 11555730.
DOI: 10.1177/23259671241286520.
Determining the Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS) for Shoulder Strength After Subscapularis Arthroscopic Repair and Evaluating the Preoperative Predictors for PASS Achievement.
Gonzalez-Morgado D, Ardebol J, Kilic A, Noble M, Galasso L, Menendez M
Orthop J Sports Med. 2024; 12(10):23259671241280736.
PMID: 39391074
PMC: 11465377.
DOI: 10.1177/23259671241280736.
Bioaugmentation demonstrates similar outcomes and failure rates for arthroscopic revision rotator cuff repair compared to revision without bioaugmentation.
Tisherman R, Como M, Okundaye O, Steuer F, Herman Z, Lesniak B
JSES Int. 2024; 8(5):1004-1009.
PMID: 39280135
PMC: 11401557.
DOI: 10.1016/j.jseint.2024.04.009.
Muscle Advancement During Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair as a Treatment Option for Irreparable Rotator Cuff Tears.
Oh S, Kim Y, Lee K, Kim S
Orthop J Sports Med. 2024; 12(9):23259671241266050.
PMID: 39247525
PMC: 11375638.
DOI: 10.1177/23259671241266050.
The Relationship Between All-Suture and Solid Medial-Row Anchors and Patient-Reported Outcomes for Double-Row Suture Bridge Rotator Cuff Repair.
Feldman J, Ostrander B, Ithurburn M, Fleisig G, Tatum R, Ochsner M
Orthop J Sports Med. 2024; 12(8):23259671241262264.
PMID: 39131094
PMC: 11307331.
DOI: 10.1177/23259671241262264.
Self-defined former smokers consume the highest opioid quantities following knee and shoulder arthroscopy.
Khalik H, Shanmugaraj A, Ekhtiari S, Horner N, Gazendam A, Simunovic N
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2024; 33(3):856-864.
PMID: 39105443
PMC: 11848975.
DOI: 10.1002/ksa.12403.
Association Between Preoperative Patient Resilience and Patient-Reported Outcomes After Rotator Cuff Repair.
Paul R, Streicher S, Wallingford M, Campbell M, Hanna A, Bryan S
Orthop J Sports Med. 2024; 12(6):23259671241255400.
PMID: 38881854
PMC: 11179476.
DOI: 10.1177/23259671241255400.
Factors affecting medium-term patient satisfaction after arthroscopic repair of small to medium-sized rotator cuff tears: An observational study.
Hapa O, Aydemir S, Acar E, Canturk A, Yanik B, Tukel G
Medicine (Baltimore). 2024; 103(20):e38211.
PMID: 38758912
PMC: 11098260.
DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000038211.
Reaching Minimal Clinically Important Difference, Substantial Clinical Benefit, and Patient-Acceptable Symptomatic State for Patient-Reported Outcome Measures following Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair Does Not Correlate with Patient Satisfaction.
Khan A, Vaughan A, Aman Z, Lazarus M, Williams G, Namdari S
J Clin Med. 2024; 13(9).
PMID: 38731077
PMC: 11084458.
DOI: 10.3390/jcm13092550.
Determining minimal clinically important difference and patient-acceptable symptom state after arthroscopic isolated subscapularis repair.
Kilic A, Zuk N, Ardebol J, Pak T, Menendez M, Denard P
JSES Int. 2024; 8(3):472-477.
PMID: 38707558
PMC: 11064692.
DOI: 10.1016/j.jseint.2024.01.014.
The Influence of Obesity on Outcomes Following Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of 118,331 Patients Internationally.
Sandler A, Green C, Scanaliato J, Fares A, Dunn J, Parnes N
JB JS Open Access. 2024; 9(2).
PMID: 38638593
PMC: 11023613.
DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.OA.23.00047.
Combined, Single-Anchor Subscapularis Tendon Repair and Proximal Biceps Tenodesis Leads to Improved Function and Decreased Pain at 1 Year.
Bartlett L, Klein B, Brancato C, Akhavan S, Paci J
Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil. 2024; 6(2):100920.
PMID: 38550338
PMC: 10972803.
DOI: 10.1016/j.asmr.2024.100920.
Estimating the minimal clinically important difference of shoulder functional scores after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: a prospective study.
Mukadam A, Nayak S, Willems J, Pandey V
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2024; 144(4):1693-1701.
PMID: 38386062
PMC: 10965714.
DOI: 10.1007/s00402-024-05222-8.
Arthroscopic superior capsule reconstruction augmentation using a semitendinosus autograft in massive reparable rotator cuff tears.
Funakoshi T, Takahashi T, Murayama T, Miyamoto A, Koga R, Kusano H
JSES Int. 2024; 8(1):32-40.
PMID: 38312265
PMC: 10837716.
DOI: 10.1016/j.jseint.2023.08.020.
Minimum Clinically Important Difference (MCID) and Patient Acceptable Symptomatic State (PASS) Applied to the SF-36 in Patients Who Underwent Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair.
Longo U, De Salvatore S, Piergentili I, Lalli A, Bandini B, Denaro V
J Clin Med. 2024; 13(1).
PMID: 38202185
PMC: 10779461.
DOI: 10.3390/jcm13010178.
Clinical outcomes of rotator cuff repair with subacromial bursa reimplantation: a retrospective cohort study.
Gregory J, Ybarra C, Liao Z, Kumaravel M, Patel S, Warth R
JSES Int. 2023; 7(5):763-767.
PMID: 37719828
PMC: 10499868.
DOI: 10.1016/j.jseint.2023.05.010.
Use of the minimal important difference as a criterion for clinical importance-are we off track?.
Moosmayer S
JSES Rev Rep Tech. 2023; 3(1):56-59.
PMID: 37588060
PMC: 10426569.
DOI: 10.1016/j.xrrt.2022.09.007.