Passenger-surface Microbiome Interactions in the Subway of Mexico City

Overview

Journal PLoS One

Specialties General Medicine
Science

Date 2020 Aug 20

PMID 32813719

Citations 9

Authors

Daniela Vargas-Robles

Carolina Gonzalez-Cedillo

Apolinar M Hernandez

Luis D Alcaraz

Mariana Peimbert

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Interaction between hands and the environment permits the interchange of microorganisms. The Mexico City subway is used daily by millions of passengers that get in contact with its surfaces. In this study, we used 16S rRNA gene sequencing to characterize the microbiomes of frequently touched surfaces and compare regular and women-only wagons. We also explored the effect of surface cleaning on microbial resettling. Finally, we studied passenger behavior and characterized microbial changes after traveling. Most passengers (99%), showed some type of surface interaction during a wagon trip, mostly with the hands (92%). We found microbiome differences associated with surfaces, probably reflecting diverse surface materials and usage frequency. The platform floor was the most bacterial diverse surface, while the stair handrail and pole were the least diverse ones. After pole cleaning, the resettling of microbial diversity was fast (5-30 minutes); however, it did not resemble the initial composition. After traveling, passengers significantly increased their hand microbial diversity and converged to a similar microbial composition among passengers. Additionally, passenger hand microbiomes resembled subway surfaces in diversity. However, microbial fingerprints were preserved within passengers after traveling.

Citing Articles

The Hygienic Significance of Microbiota and Probiotics for Human Wellbeing.

Todorov S, Tagg J, Algburi A, Tiwari S, Popov I, Weeks R Probiotics Antimicrob Proteins. 2024; .

PMID: 39688648 DOI: 10.1007/s12602-024-10419-9.

CAMDA 2023: Finding patterns in urban microbiomes.

Contreras-Peruyero H, Nunez I, Vazquez-Rosas-Landa M, Santana-Quinteros D, Pashkov A, Carranza-Barragan M Front Genet. 2024; 15:1449461.

PMID: 39655221 PMC: 11625776. DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2024.1449461.

An overview of the bacterial microbiome of public transportation systems-risks, detection, and countermeasures.

Ly Y, Leuko S, Moeller R Front Public Health. 2024; 12:1367324.

PMID: 38528857 PMC: 10961368. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1367324.

Shaping the subway microbiome through probiotic-based sanitation during the COVID-19 emergency: a pre-post case-control study.

DAccolti M, Soffritti I, Bini F, Mazziga E, Cason C, Comar M Microbiome. 2023; 11(1):64.

PMID: 36991513 PMC: 10060134. DOI: 10.1186/s40168-023-01512-2.

The Microbiome of the Built Environment: The Nexus for Urban Regeneration for the Cities of Tomorrow.

Bruno A, Fumagalli S, Ghisleni G, Labra M Microorganisms. 2022; 10(12).

PMID: 36557564 PMC: 9783557. DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms10122311.

References

Callahan B, McMurdie P, Rosen M, Han A, Johnson A, Holmes S . DADA2: High-resolution sample inference from Illumina amplicon data. Nat Methods. 2016; 13(7):581-3. PMC: 4927377. DOI: 10.1038/nmeth.3869. View

Hsu T, Joice R, Vallarino J, Abu-Ali G, Hartmann E, Shafquat A . Urban Transit System Microbial Communities Differ by Surface Type and Interaction with Humans and the Environment. mSystems. 2016; 1(3). PMC: 5069760. DOI: 10.1128/mSystems.00018-16. View

Wang Q, Garrity G, Tiedje J, Cole J . Naive Bayesian classifier for rapid assignment of rRNA sequences into the new bacterial taxonomy. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2007; 73(16):5261-7. PMC: 1950982. DOI: 10.1128/AEM.00062-07. View

Quast C, Pruesse E, Yilmaz P, Gerken J, Schweer T, Yarza P . The SILVA ribosomal RNA gene database project: improved data processing and web-based tools. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012; 41(Database issue):D590-6. PMC: 3531112. DOI: 10.1093/nar/gks1219. View

Song S, Lauber C, Costello E, Lozupone C, Humphrey G, Berg-Lyons D . Cohabiting family members share microbiota with one another and with their dogs. Elife. 2013; 2:e00458. PMC: 3628085. DOI: 10.7554/eLife.00458. View

Gao Z, Tseng C, Pei Z, Blaser M . Molecular analysis of human forearm superficial skin bacterial biota. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007; 104(8):2927-32. PMC: 1815283. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0607077104. View

Segata N, Izard J, Waldron L, Gevers D, Miropolsky L, Garrett W . Metagenomic biomarker discovery and explanation. Genome Biol. 2011; 12(6):R60. PMC: 3218848. DOI: 10.1186/gb-2011-12-6-r60. View

Hernandez A, Vargas-Robles D, Alcaraz L, Peimbert M . Station and train surface microbiomes of Mexico City's metro (subway/underground). Sci Rep. 2020; 10(1):8798. PMC: 7260218. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-65643-4. View

Gibbons S, Schwartz T, Fouquier J, Mitchell M, Sangwan N, Gilbert J . Ecological succession and viability of human-associated microbiota on restroom surfaces. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2014; 81(2):765-73. PMC: 4277569. DOI: 10.1128/AEM.03117-14. View

10.

. The Metagenomics and Metadesign of the Subways and Urban Biomes (MetaSUB) International Consortium inaugural meeting report. Microbiome. 2016; 4(1):24. PMC: 4894504. DOI: 10.1186/s40168-016-0168-z. View

11.

Li W, Godzik A . Cd-hit: a fast program for clustering and comparing large sets of protein or nucleotide sequences. Bioinformatics. 2006; 22(13):1658-9. DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btl158. View

12.

Ross A, Doxey A, Neufeld J . The Skin Microbiome of Cohabiting Couples. mSystems. 2017; 2(4). PMC: 5527301. DOI: 10.1128/mSystems.00043-17. View

13.

Fierer N, Nemergut D, Knight R, Craine J . Changes through time: integrating microorganisms into the study of succession. Res Microbiol. 2010; 161(8):635-42. DOI: 10.1016/j.resmic.2010.06.002. View

14.

Lax S, Smith D, Hampton-Marcell J, Owens S, Handley K, Scott N . Longitudinal analysis of microbial interaction between humans and the indoor environment. Science. 2014; 345(6200):1048-52. PMC: 4337996. DOI: 10.1126/science.1254529. View

15.

Kang K, Ni Y, Li J, Imamovic L, Sarkar C, Kobler M . The Environmental Exposures and Inner- and Intercity Traffic Flows of the Metro System May Contribute to the Skin Microbiome and Resistome. Cell Rep. 2018; 24(5):1190-1202.e5. DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2018.06.109. View

16.

Afshinnekoo E, Meydan C, Chowdhury S, Jaroudi D, Boyer C, Bernstein N . Geospatial Resolution of Human and Bacterial Diversity with City-Scale Metagenomics. Cell Syst. 2015; 1(1):72-87. PMC: 4651444. DOI: 10.1016/j.cels.2015.01.001. View

17.

Liu Y, Yang S, Li Y, Xu H, Qin L, Tay J . The influence of cell and substratum surface hydrophobicities on microbial attachment. J Biotechnol. 2004; 110(3):251-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2004.02.012. View

18.

Gohli J, Boifot K, Moen L, Pastuszek P, Skogan G, Udekwu K . The subway microbiome: seasonal dynamics and direct comparison of air and surface bacterial communities. Microbiome. 2019; 7(1):160. PMC: 6924074. DOI: 10.1186/s40168-019-0772-9. View

19.

DeSantis T, Hugenholtz P, Larsen N, Rojas M, Brodie E, Keller K . Greengenes, a chimera-checked 16S rRNA gene database and workbench compatible with ARB. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2006; 72(7):5069-72. PMC: 1489311. DOI: 10.1128/AEM.03006-05. View

20.

Luongo J, Barberan A, Hacker-Cary R, Morgan E, Miller S, Fierer N . Microbial analyses of airborne dust collected from dormitory rooms predict the sex of occupants. Indoor Air. 2016; 27(2):338-344. DOI: 10.1111/ina.12302. View