» Articles » PMID: 32804348

Magnetic Compression Anastomosis is Effective in Treating Stenosis After Esophageal Cancer Surgery: a Case Report

Overview
Journal Surg Case Rep
Specialty General Surgery
Date 2020 Aug 18
PMID 32804348
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Esophagostomy is important in the treatment of esophageal cancer. However, esophagectomy has a higher risk of postoperative complications. Treatment for complications is often difficult, and in some cases, oral intake is no longer possible. Recently, magnetic compression anastomosis (MCA) was developed; it is a relatively safe method of anastomosis that does not require surgery in patients with stricture, obstruction, or dehiscence of the anastomosis after surgery.

Case Presentation: The patient was a 76-year-old Japanese man. He underwent esophagectomy with a three-field dissection for esophageal cancer. A cervical esophagostomy and chest drainage were performed for necrosis of the gastric tube. Following infection control, colon interposition was performed. However, after the operation, the colon necrotized and formed an abscess. Drainage controlled the infection, but the colon was completely obstructed. The patient was referred to our hospital to restore oral ingestion. Contrast studies showed that the length of the occlusion was 10 mm. The reconstruction was examined; reanastomosis by surgery was judged to be a high risk, so the strategy of anastomosis by MCA was adopted. In the operation, the anterior chest was opened to expose the colon, and a magnet was inserted directly into the blind end of the colon. The magnet was guided to the blind end of the esophagus using an oral endoscope. Two weeks after MCA, a contrast study confirmed the passage of the contrast agent from the esophagus to the colon. The patient eventually took 18 bougies after the MCA. However, since then, he has not needed a bougie. As of 1 year and 8 months after the MCA, the patient is living at home with oral intake restored.

Conclusions: MCA is an effective and safe treatment for complete stenosis after esophageal cancer surgery.

Citing Articles

Enhanced hemocompatibility and rapid magnetic anastomosis of electrospun small-diameter artificial vascular grafts.

Liu P, Liu X, Yang L, Qian Y, Lu Q, Shi A Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2024; 12:1331078.

PMID: 38328445 PMC: 10847591. DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2024.1331078.


Magnetic Compression Anastomosis-Past Experience and Current Proposals for Further Development in Pediatric Minimally Invasive Surgery.

Kotlovsky A, Muensterer O, Nikolaev V, Razumovskiy A Children (Basel). 2023; 10(8).

PMID: 37628327 PMC: 10453638. DOI: 10.3390/children10081328.


The Evolving Use of Magnets in Surgery: Biomedical Considerations and a Review of Their Current Applications.

Lee W, Evans L, Johnson S, Woo R Bioengineering (Basel). 2023; 10(4).

PMID: 37106629 PMC: 10136001. DOI: 10.3390/bioengineering10040442.

References
1.
Kubo M, Wada H, Eguchi H, Gotoh K, Iwagami Y, Yamada D . Magnetic compression anastomosis for the complete dehiscence of hepaticojejunostomy in a patient after living-donor liver transplantation. Surg Case Rep. 2018; 4(1):95. PMC: 6093822. DOI: 10.1186/s40792-018-0504-6. View

2.
Derogar M, Lagergren P . Health-related quality of life among 5-year survivors of esophageal cancer surgery: a prospective population-based study. J Clin Oncol. 2012; 30(4):413-8. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2011.38.9791. View

3.
Gust L, Ouattara M, Coosemans W, Nafteux P, Thomas P, DJourno X . European perspective in Thoracic surgery-eso-coloplasty: when and how?. J Thorac Dis. 2016; 8(Suppl 4):S387-98. PMC: 4856848. DOI: 10.21037/jtd.2016.04.43. View

4.
Greene C, DeMeester S, Worrell S, Oh D, Hagen J, DeMeester T . Alimentary satisfaction, gastrointestinal symptoms, and quality of life 10 or more years after esophagectomy with gastric pull-up. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2013; 147(3):909-14. DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2013.11.004. View

5.
Reslinger V, Tranchart H, DAnnunzio E, Poghosyan T, Quero L, Munoz-Bongrand N . Esophageal reconstruction by colon interposition after esophagectomy for cancer analysis of current indications, operative outcomes, and long-term survival. J Surg Oncol. 2015; 113(2):159-64. DOI: 10.1002/jso.24118. View