» Articles » PMID: 32802302

Network Meta-Analysis of the Safety of Drug Therapy for Cardiogenic Shock

Overview
Journal J Healthc Eng
Date 2020 Aug 18
PMID 32802302
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: (1) To conduct a network meta-analysis of clinical drugs used for cardiogenic shock and (2) provide evidence for the selection of medication for the treatment of this condition.

Methods: PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane library, China HowNet (CNKI), Wanfang database, and Weipu database were searched using keywords Dopamine, Dobutamine, Epinephrine, Adrenaline, Norepinephrine, Noradrenaline, Milrinone, Natriuretic peptide, Recombinant human brain natriuretic peptide, Levosimendan, Cardiac shock, and Cardiogenic shock. We select literature according to prespecified inclusion and exclusion criteria and record data such as drug type, mortality, and adverse reactions.

Results: Twenty-eight of 1387 articles met inclusion criteria, comprising 1806 patients who suffered from cardiogenic shock. Dopamine, dobutamine, epinephrine, norepinephrine, milrinone, recombinant human brain natriuretic peptide, and levosimendan were all commonly used in the treatment of cardiogenic shock. Milrinone was most effective at reducing mortality and had the lowest incidence of adverse reactions.

Conclusion: This network meta-analysis demonstrated that milrinone was the most effective medication at reducing mortality and adverse events in patients suffering from cardiogenic shock.

Citing Articles

Levosimendan in intensive care and emergency medicine: literature update and expert recommendations for optimal efficacy and safety.

Girardis M, Bettex D, Bojan M, Demponeras C, Fruhwald S, Gal J J Anesth Analg Crit Care. 2023; 2(1):4.

PMID: 37386589 PMC: 8785009. DOI: 10.1186/s44158-021-00030-7.


Inotropic support in cardiogenic shock: who leads the battle, milrinone or dobutamine?.

Lozada Martinez I, Bayona-Gamboa A, Meza-Fandino D, Paz-Echeverry O, Avila-Bonilla A, Paz-Echeverry M Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2022; 82:104763.

PMID: 36268289 PMC: 9577832. DOI: 10.1016/j.amsu.2022.104763.

References
1.
Levy B, Clere-Jehl R, Legras A, Morichau-Beauchant T, Leone M, Frederique G . Epinephrine Versus Norepinephrine for Cardiogenic Shock After Acute Myocardial Infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018; 72(2):173-182. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.04.051. View

2.
Lewis T, Aberle C, Altshuler D, Piper G, Papadopoulos J . Comparative Effectiveness and Safety Between Milrinone or Dobutamine as Initial Inotrope Therapy in Cardiogenic Shock. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol Ther. 2018; 24(2):130-138. DOI: 10.1177/1074248418797357. View

3.
Leopold V, Gayat E, Pirracchio R, Spinar J, Parenica J, Tarvasmaki T . Epinephrine and short-term survival in cardiogenic shock: an individual data meta-analysis of 2583 patients. Intensive Care Med. 2018; 44(6):847-856. DOI: 10.1007/s00134-018-5222-9. View

4.
Werdan K, Russ M, Buerke M, Prondzinsky R, Dietz S . Evidence-based Management of Cardiogenic Shock After Acute Myocardial Infarction. Interv Cardiol. 2018; 8(2):73-80. PMC: 5808586. DOI: 10.15420/icr.2013.8.2.73. View

5.
Champion S, Deye N . [Management of cardiogenic shock: Results from a survey in France and Belgium]. Ann Cardiol Angeiol (Paris). 2016; 66(2):59-65. DOI: 10.1016/j.ancard.2016.10.013. View