» Articles » PMID: 32797404

Clinical Utility and Cost Savings in Predicting Inadequate Response to Anti-TNF Therapies in Rheumatoid Arthritis

Overview
Journal Rheumatol Ther
Date 2020 Aug 16
PMID 32797404
Citations 11
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: The PrismRA test identifies rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients who are unlikely to respond to anti-tumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) therapies. This study evaluated the clinical and financial outcomes of incorporating PrismRA into routine clinical care of RA patients.

Methods: A decision-analytic model was created to evaluate clinical and economic outcomes in the 12-month period following first biologic treatment. Two treatment strategies were compared: (1) observed clinical decision-making based on a 175-patient cohort receiving an anti-TNF therapy as their first biologic after failure of conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (csDMARDs) and (2) modeled clinical decision-making of the same population using PrismRA results to inform first-line biologic treatment choice. Modeled costs include biologic drug pharmacy, non-biologic pharmacy, and total medical costs. The odds of inadequate response to anti-TNF therapies and various components of patient care were calculated based on PrismRA results.

Results: Identifying predicted inadequate responders to anti-TNF therapies resulted in a modeled 38% increase in ACR50 response to first-line biologic therapies. The fraction of patients who achieved an ACR50 response to any therapy (TNFi and others) within the 12-month period was 33% higher in the PrismRA-stratified population than in the unstratified population (59 vs. 44%, respectively). When therapy prescriptions were modeled according to PrismRA results, cost savings were modeled for all financial variables: overall costs (4% decreased total, 19% decreased on ineffective treatments), total biologic drug pharmacy (4% total, 23% ineffective), non-biologic pharmacy (2% total, 19% ineffective), and medical costs (6% total, 19% ineffective). Female sex was the clinical metric that showed the greatest association with inadequate response to anti-TNF therapies (odds ratio 2.42, 95% confidence interval 1.20, 4.88).

Conclusions: If PrismRA is implemented into routine clinical care as modeled, predicting which RA patients will have an inadequate response to anti-TNF therapies could save > $7 million in overall ineffective healthcare costs per 1000 patients tested and increase targeted DMARD response rates in RA.

Citing Articles

Real-World Use and Effectiveness Outcomes in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis Treated with Upadacitinib: An Analysis from the CorEvitas Registry.

Baker J, Zueger P, Ali M, Bennett D, Yu M, Munoz Maldonado Y Rheumatol Ther. 2024; 11(2):363-380.

PMID: 38345715 PMC: 10920593. DOI: 10.1007/s40744-024-00639-4.


Real-World Treatment and Care Patterns in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis Initiating First-Line Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitor Therapy in the United States.

Edgerton C, Frick A, Helfgott S, Huston K, Singh J, Zueger P ACR Open Rheumatol. 2024; 6(4):179-188.

PMID: 38221639 PMC: 11016569. DOI: 10.1002/acr2.11646.


One-Year Medication Adherence and Persistence in Rheumatoid Arthritis in Clinical Practice: A Retrospective Analysis of Upadacitinib, Adalimumab, Baricitinib, and Tofacitinib.

Bergman M, Chen N, Thielen R, Zueger P Adv Ther. 2023; 40(10):4493-4503.

PMID: 37542646 PMC: 10499920. DOI: 10.1007/s12325-023-02619-6.


Real-World Sarilumab Use and Rule Testing to Predict Treatment Response in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis: Findings from the RISE Registry.

Curtis J, Yun H, Chen L, Ford S, van Hoogstraten H, Fiore S Rheumatol Ther. 2023; 10(4):1055-1072.

PMID: 37349636 PMC: 10326227. DOI: 10.1007/s40744-023-00568-8.


Tailored therapeutic decision of rheumatoid arthritis using proteomic strategies: how to start and when to stop?.

Chen S, Yeh F, Chen C, Chang H Clin Proteomics. 2023; 20(1):22.

PMID: 37301840 PMC: 10257292. DOI: 10.1186/s12014-023-09411-2.


References
1.
Keystone E, Taylor P, Drescher E, Schlichting D, Beattie S, Berclaz P . Safety and efficacy of baricitinib at 24 weeks in patients with rheumatoid arthritis who have had an inadequate response to methotrexate. Ann Rheum Dis. 2014; 74(2):333-40. PMC: 4316868. DOI: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2014-206478. View

2.
Burmester G, Blanco R, Charles-Schoeman C, Wollenhaupt J, Zerbini C, Benda B . Tofacitinib (CP-690,550) in combination with methotrexate in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis with an inadequate response to tumour necrosis factor inhibitors: a randomised phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2013; 381(9865):451-60. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61424-X. View

3.
Edwards J, Szczepanski L, Szechinski J, Filipowicz-Sosnowska A, Emery P, Close D . Efficacy of B-cell-targeted therapy with rituximab in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. N Engl J Med. 2004; 350(25):2572-81. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa032534. View

4.
Rein P, Mueller R . Treatment with Biologicals in Rheumatoid Arthritis: An Overview. Rheumatol Ther. 2017; 4(2):247-261. PMC: 5696285. DOI: 10.1007/s40744-017-0073-3. View

5.
Johnson K, Sanchez H, Schoenbrunner N . Defining response to TNF-inhibitors in rheumatoid arthritis: the negative impact of anti-TNF cycling and the need for a personalized medicine approach to identify primary non-responders. Clin Rheumatol. 2019; 38(11):2967-2976. DOI: 10.1007/s10067-019-04684-1. View