» Articles » PMID: 32797099

Bone Metastasis Classification Using Whole Body Images from Prostate Cancer Patients Based on Convolutional Neural Networks Application

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2020 Aug 16
PMID 32797099
Citations 27
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Bone metastasis is one of the most frequent diseases in prostate cancer; scintigraphy imaging is particularly important for the clinical diagnosis of bone metastasis. Up to date, minimal research has been conducted regarding the application of machine learning with emphasis on modern efficient convolutional neural networks (CNNs) algorithms, for the diagnosis of prostate cancer metastasis from bone scintigraphy images. The advantageous and outstanding capabilities of deep learning, machine learning's groundbreaking technological advancement, have not yet been fully investigated regarding their application in computer-aided diagnosis systems in the field of medical image analysis, such as the problem of bone metastasis classification in whole-body scans. In particular, CNNs are gaining great attention due to their ability to recognize complex visual patterns, in the same way as human perception operates. Considering all these new enhancements in the field of deep learning, a set of simpler, faster and more accurate CNN architectures, designed for classification of metastatic prostate cancer in bones, is explored. This research study has a two-fold goal: to create and also demonstrate a set of simple but robust CNN models for automatic classification of whole-body scans in two categories, malignant (bone metastasis) or healthy, using solely the scans at the input level. Through a meticulous exploration of CNN hyper-parameter selection and fine-tuning, the best architecture is selected with respect to classification accuracy. Thus a CNN model with improved classification capabilities for bone metastasis diagnosis is produced, using bone scans from prostate cancer patients. The achieved classification testing accuracy is 97.38%, whereas the average sensitivity is approximately 95.8%. Finally, the best-performing CNN method is compared to other popular and well-known CNN architectures used for medical imaging, like VGG16, ResNet50, GoogleNet and MobileNet. The classification results show that the proposed CNN-based approach outperforms the popular CNN methods in nuclear medicine for metastatic prostate cancer diagnosis in bones.

Citing Articles

Artificial Intelligence in Detection, Management, and Prognosis of Bone Metastasis: A Systematic Review.

Papalia G, Brigato P, Sisca L, Maltese G, Faiella E, Santucci D Cancers (Basel). 2024; 16(15).

PMID: 39123427 PMC: 11311270. DOI: 10.3390/cancers16152700.


AI-assisted Analysis to Facilitate Detection of Humeral Lesions on Chest Radiographs.

Kim H, Kim K, Oh S, Lee S, Woo J, Kim J Radiol Artif Intell. 2024; 6(3):e230094.

PMID: 38446041 PMC: 11140509. DOI: 10.1148/ryai.230094.


Stability of standardized uptake values for quantitative bone SPECT for jawbone lesions: a single-center cross-sectional study.

Hata H, Shimomura S, Imamachi K, Sato J, Asaka T, Hirata K BMC Oral Health. 2024; 24(1):305.

PMID: 38443942 PMC: 10913536. DOI: 10.1186/s12903-024-04067-2.


Performance of deep learning models for response evaluation on whole-body bone scans in prostate cancer.

Han S, Oh J, Seo S, Lee J Ann Nucl Med. 2023; 37(12):685-694.

PMID: 37819584 DOI: 10.1007/s12149-023-01872-7.


Imaging signs and the qualitative diagnosis of solitary rib lesions using technetium-methylene diphosphonate whole-body bone imaging in patients with a malignant tumor.

Tong L, Jiang S, Sui Y, Yin Y, Fu L, Zhong J Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2023; 13(9):5688-5700.

PMID: 37711772 PMC: 10498199. DOI: 10.21037/qims-22-1159.


References
1.
Yasaka K, Akai H, Abe O, Kiryu S . Deep Learning with Convolutional Neural Network for Differentiation of Liver Masses at Dynamic Contrast-enhanced CT: A Preliminary Study. Radiology. 2017; 286(3):887-896. DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2017170706. View

2.
Brinker T, Hekler A, Enk A, Klode J, Hauschild A, Berking C . Deep learning outperformed 136 of 157 dermatologists in a head-to-head dermoscopic melanoma image classification task. Eur J Cancer. 2019; 113:47-54. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2019.04.001. View

3.
Sadik M, Suurkula M, Hoglund P, Jarund A, Edenbrandt L . Quality of planar whole-body bone scan interpretations--a nationwide survey. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2008; 35(8):1464-72. DOI: 10.1007/s00259-008-0721-5. View

4.
Li Z, Wang Y, Yu J, Guo Y, Cao W . Deep Learning based Radiomics (DLR) and its usage in noninvasive IDH1 prediction for low grade glioma. Sci Rep. 2017; 7(1):5467. PMC: 5511238. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-05848-2. View

5.
Fogelman I, Cook G, Israel O, Van der Wall H . Positron emission tomography and bone metastases. Semin Nucl Med. 2005; 35(2):135-42. DOI: 10.1053/j.semnuclmed.2004.11.005. View