» Articles » PMID: 32794031

Prognostic Score-Based Stratification Analysis Reveals Universal Benefits of Radiotherapy on Lowering the Risk of Ipsilateral Breast Event for Ductal Carcinoma In Situ Patients with Different Risk Levels

Overview
Journal Ann Surg Oncol
Publisher Springer
Specialty Oncology
Date 2020 Aug 15
PMID 32794031
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: We aimed to analyze the effects of radiotherapy (RT) on the incidence rate of ipsilateral breast event (IBE) in ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) patients with lumpectomy after being stratified by prognostic score.

Methods: We identified DCIS patients who received lumpectomy, from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database from 1988 to 2015. Cumulative incidence functions for competing risk were used to evaluate the effects of RT on IBE risk over time. Three multivariate regression models (weighted, non-weighted, and Fine-Gray) were applied to compare the IBE risk between the RT and non-RT groups after stratifying patients by prognostic score.

Results: Overall, 72,623 DCIS patients were identified from the SEER database and 49,206 (66.8%) patients received RT. During the follow-up period (ranging from 7 to 347 months), the cumulative probability of invasive and in situ IBE was significantly lower in the RT group than in the non-RT group (p < 0.001). After being stratified by prognostic score, the weighted IBE incidence rate increased as the risk level increased (p < 0.050). In multivariate regression models, RT lowered the IBE incidence rate by at least 30% in low-, moderate-, and high-risk DCIS (p < 0.010). In particular, the in situ and invasive IBE incidence rate decreased by over 50% in low-risk DCIS with RT (p < 0.001).

Conclusions: RT is associated with a lowered IBE incidence rate in DCIS patients, regardless of the assigned risk levels for patients. The significant reduction in the IBE incidence rate in low-risk DCIS patients also indicates the potential benefits for recommending RT to such a patient population in clinical practice.

Citing Articles

Molecular subtyping reveals uniqueness of prognosis in breast ductal carcinoma in situ patients with lumpectomy.

Yang L, Shen M, Qiu Y, Tang T, Bu H Breast. 2022; 64:1-6.

PMID: 35462343 PMC: 9039875. DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2022.03.019.


Incidence, prognosis and nomograms of breast cancer with bone metastases at initial diagnosis: a large population-based study.

Yao Y, Zheng X, Luo X, Wu A Am J Transl Res. 2021; 13(9):10248-10261.

PMID: 34650694 PMC: 8507056.


ASO Author Reflections: Oncologic Outcome of Endoscopic-Assisted Breast Surgery Compared with the Conventional Approach in Breast Cancers.

Lai H Ann Surg Oncol. 2021; 28(12):7381-7382.

PMID: 33907922 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-021-10011-3.

References
1.
Elshof L, Schaapveld M, Rutgers E, Schmidt M, de Munck L, van Leeuwen F . The method of detection of ductal carcinoma in situ has no therapeutic implications: results of a population-based cohort study. Breast Cancer Res. 2017; 19(1):26. PMC: 5343406. DOI: 10.1186/s13058-017-0819-4. View

2.
Olivotto I, Bancej C, Goel V, Snider J, McAuley R, Irvine B . Waiting times from abnormal breast screen to diagnosis in 7 Canadian provinces. CMAJ. 2001; 165(3):277-83. PMC: 81326. View

3.
Oseni T, Zhang B, Coopey S, Gadd M, Hughes K, Chang D . Twenty-Five Year Trends in the Incidence of Ductal Carcinoma in Situ in US Women. J Am Coll Surg. 2019; 228(6):932-939. DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2019.01.018. View

4.
van Seijen M, Lips E, Thompson A, Nik-Zainal S, Futreal A, Hwang E . Ductal carcinoma in situ: to treat or not to treat, that is the question. Br J Cancer. 2019; 121(4):285-292. PMC: 6697179. DOI: 10.1038/s41416-019-0478-6. View

5.
Elshof L, Schmidt M, Rutgers E, van Leeuwen F, Wesseling J, Schaapveld M . Cause-specific Mortality in a Population-based Cohort of 9799 Women Treated for Ductal Carcinoma In Situ. Ann Surg. 2017; 267(5):952-958. PMC: 5916471. DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002239. View