» Articles » PMID: 32793100

Improved Gait of Persons With Multiple Sclerosis After Rehabilitation: Effects on Lower Limb Muscle Synergies, Push-Off, and Toe-Clearance

Overview
Journal Front Neurol
Specialty Neurology
Date 2020 Aug 15
PMID 32793100
Citations 8
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Persons with MS (PwMS) have markedly reduced push-off and toe-clearance during gait compared to healthy subjects (HS). These deficits may result from alterations in neuromotor control at the ankle. To optimize rehabilitation interventions for PwMS, a crucial step is to evaluate if and how altered neuromotor control, as represented by muscle synergies, improves with rehabilitation. In this study we investigated changes in ankle motor control and associated biomechanical parameters during gait in PwMS, occurring with increase in speed after gait rehabilitation. 3D motion and EMG data were collected while 11 PwMS (age 50.3 + 11.1; EDSS 5.2 + 1.2) walked overground at self-selected speed before (T0) and after 20 sessions (T1) of intensive treadmill training. Muscle synergies were extracted using non-negative matrix factorization. Gait parameters were computed according to the LAMB protocol. Pearson's correlation coefficient was used to evaluate the similarity of motor modules between PwMS and HS. To assess differences in distal module activations representing neuromotor control at the ankle [Forward Propulsion (FPM) and Ground Clearance modules (GCM)], each module's activation timing was integrated over 100% of the gait cycle and the activation percentage index (API) was computed in six phases. Ten age matched HS provided two separate speed-matched normative datasets for T0 and T1. For speed independent comparison for the PwMs scores were calculated for all their gait variables. In PwMS velocity increased significantly from T0 to T1 (0.74-0.90 m/s, < 0.05). The activation profiles (API) of FPM and GCM of PwMS improved in pre-swing ( < 0.05): FPM (Mean [95% CI] [%]: T0: 12.5 [5.7-19.3] vs. T1: 9.0 [2.7-15.3]); GCM (T0: 26.7 [18.2-35.3] vs. T1: 24.5 [18.2-30.7]). This was associated with an increase in toe clearance (80.3 to 103.6 mm, < 0.05) and a higher ankle power peak in pre-swing (1.53-1.93 W/kg, < 0.05). Increased gait speed of PwMS after intensive gait training was consistent with improvements in spatio-temporal gait parameters. The most important finding of this study was the re-organization of distal leg modules related to neurophysiological changes induced by rehabilitation. This was associated with an improved ankle performance.

Citing Articles

Motor modules are largely unaffected by pathological walking biomechanics: a simulation study.

Rahimi Goloujeh M, Allen J J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2025; 22(1):16.

PMID: 39885573 PMC: 11780838. DOI: 10.1186/s12984-025-01561-8.


Application of Muscle Synergies for Gait Rehabilitation After Stroke: Implications for Future Research.

Lee J, Kim K, Cho Y, Kim H Neurol Int. 2024; 16(6):1451-1463.

PMID: 39585067 PMC: 11587486. DOI: 10.3390/neurolint16060108.


Muscle Synergy Analysis as a Tool for Assessing the Effectiveness of Gait Rehabilitation Therapies: A Methodological Review and Perspective.

Borzelli D, DE Marchis C, Quercia A, de Pasquale P, Casile A, Quartarone A Bioengineering (Basel). 2024; 11(8).

PMID: 39199751 PMC: 11351442. DOI: 10.3390/bioengineering11080793.


Propulsive Force Modulation Drives Split-Belt Treadmill Adaptation in People with Multiple Sclerosis.

Hagen A, Patrick C, Bast I, Fling B Sensors (Basel). 2024; 24(4).

PMID: 38400224 PMC: 10891828. DOI: 10.3390/s24041067.


Complementary use of statistical parametric mapping and gait profile score to describe walking alterations in multiple sclerosis: a cross-sectional study.

Mestanza Mattos F, Luciano F, Lencioni T, Gervasoni E, Jonsdottir J, Anastasi D Sci Rep. 2023; 13(1):10465.

PMID: 37380732 PMC: 10307864. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-36916-5.


References
1.
Gijbels D, Eijnde B, Feys P . Comparison of the 2- and 6-minute walk test in multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler. 2011; 17(10):1269-72. DOI: 10.1177/1352458511408475. View

2.
Severini G, Manca M, Ferraresi G, Caniatti L, Cosma M, Baldasso F . Evaluation of Clinical Gait Analysis parameters in patients affected by Multiple Sclerosis: Analysis of kinematics. Clin Biomech (Bristol). 2017; 45:1-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2017.04.001. View

3.
Polman C, Reingold S, Edan G, Filippi M, Hartung H, Kappos L . Diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: 2005 revisions to the "McDonald Criteria". Ann Neurol. 2005; 58(6):840-6. DOI: 10.1002/ana.20703. View

4.
Safavynia S, Torres-Oviedo G, Ting L . Muscle Synergies: Implications for Clinical Evaluation and Rehabilitation of Movement. Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil. 2011; 17(1):16-24. PMC: 3143193. DOI: 10.1310/sci1701-16. View

5.
Schlaeger R, Papinutto N, Panara V, Bevan C, Lobach I, Bucci M . Spinal cord gray matter atrophy correlates with multiple sclerosis disability. Ann Neurol. 2014; 76(4):568-80. PMC: 5316412. DOI: 10.1002/ana.24241. View